Return to: Home | Blogs | Fourth Estate

Death of a marine

Associated Press and the ethics of war photography

The Associated Press has triggered a furious debate in the US by publishing a photo of a marine moments before his death. The furore over the photo of the 21-year-old marine, Joshua Bernard, who died after being hit by a rocket-propelled grenade, reminds us that depicting military deaths remains taboo in many parts of the US.

It was only this year that the Pentagon finally allowed the US media to photograph military caskets, reversing a ban introduced by President Bush at the time of the Gulf War.

The US defence secretary, Robert Gates, is said to have "begged" the news agency to withhold the image and has accused AP of showing a "lack of compassion" to Bernard's family.

In a fiercely worded letter to the AP president, Tom Curley, he said:

Why your organisation would purposefully defy the family's wishes, knowing full well that it will lead to yet more anguish, is beyond me. Your lack of compassion and common sense in choosing to put this image of their maimed and stricken child on the front page of multiple American newspapers is appalling.

AP has countered Gates's charges here, with Santiago Lyon, its director of photography, arguing: "AP journalists document world events every day. Afghanistan is no exception. We feel it is our journalistic duty to show the reality of the war there, however unpleasant and brutal that sometimes is."

In this instance, my sympathies lie with AP and the photographer, Julie Jacobson. There is no evidence that the agency is exploiting the image in the manner of a grubby tabloid and the US political and military Establishment has long taken a self-interested approach to the use of graphic battlefield images.

Gates would do well to remember the grief and anguish that photographers can experience in such situations.

I couldn't help but be reminded of the case of Kevin Carter, the South African photographer whose most famous image showed an emaciated Sudanese child stalked by a vulture. Carter won a Pulitzer Prize for the photo but was haunted by claims that he should have intervened to help the girl earlier than he did (one journalist remarked that Carter "might just as well be a predator, another vulture on the scene"). His grief led him to take his own life by carbon monoxide poisoning a few months later.

Carter, who was also a member of the famed Bang-Bang Club and the first person to photograph a public execution by "necklacing'" in South Africa, once described the dilemma faced by photojournalists:

I am zooming in on a tight shot of the dead guy and a splash of red. Going into his khaki uniform in a pool of blood in the sand. The dead man's face is slightly grey. You are making a visual here. But inside something is screaming, "My God." But it is time to work. Deal with the rest later. If you can't do it, get out of the game.

It is a dilemma that Gates and other critics should reflect on.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

6 comments from readers

Leon Gork
07 September 2009 at 19:57

War isn't fought by journalists. It's fought by nations to get victory. The nation has the duty to censor any piece of journalism or anything that runs contrary to the objectives of victory. The nation is unjust in leaving the responisibility for victory in the hands of Journalists. The nation must take responsibility. It's downright disgusting that the journalist is left to make the decision to publish or not. In that way he's doing the job of the state. His interest might conflict with the interests of the state.

M.
07 September 2009 at 20:37

Leon Gork:

Are you being ironic? Please, tell me you are. Otherwise, I fear you're entirely insane.


07 September 2009 at 22:48

I wish I understood enough to in a position to judge whether it was ironic, serious, genius, the voice of insanity or just a bad translation, Just what do you mean Leon?

Little john
08 September 2009 at 00:50

These pictures are not of a dead soldier, he was seriously wounded and sadly, died of his wounds later. War is hell, and the world should see this. I come from a long line of soldiers, going back to the Revolutionary War,I am a Disabled Vet of the US Army, my three sons were US Army, two of them in Desert Storm. Taking pictures of the wounded being tended to is not the same as standing over a dead soldiers body and zooming in on the open wounds and lifeless eyes. To much is being made of this, yes it hurts for the family to see it, but they should see the other side of it, and think of their sons brothers in arms that fought to save his life and protect him till he could be evacted out and support fire for the chopper till it was out of range of the enemy. God Rest his soul, a Brave Hero has Fallen.

paul (scotland)
08 September 2009 at 21:42

maybe thats what it takes for the government to realise that our troops are under valued and need more resources. little john makes a good point.

EK
14 September 2009 at 16:29

You can say what you want, pretending to hide behind your lofty journalistic ideals. But AP's decision to publish this photo is wrong for one screaming reason. The family of the marine asked that it not be published. That is reason enough.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

Cameron's hypocrisy on the tabloids

27 November 2009 11:50

Is Mandelson heading for TV?

26 November 2009 15:29

Berlusconi crowned "rock star of the year"

26 November 2009 10:53

Holocaust gaffe publisher up for award

25 November 2009 17:18

Is Wikipedia dying?

25 November 2009 15:46

Ed Miliband and Jenni Russell

25 November 2009 11:09

PMQs should be held twice a week

24 November 2009 13:45

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will the next election produce a hung parliament?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker