Observer lives to fight another day
Paper will continue to be published but at what cost?
By George Eaton Published 17 September 2009 18:45As I anticipated on Wednesday, Guardian News & Media confirmed a few minutes ago that it would continue to publish the Observer -- ending weeks of speculation over the title's future. But the paper's staff will immediately ask: "At what cost?"
The Guardian announcement promises "further editorial integration" between the two titles, something that could spell the end of the Observer's popular monthly supplements and its stand-alone business section. The title's journalists are unlikely to be content with a vastly slimmed-down version of the paper that leaves it unable to compete with its Sunday rivals.
Guardian Media Group (GMG) had considered closing the Observer in an attempt to stem losses that stood at nearly £90m this year.
For now the title's future is safe, but unless the Guardian finds a way to monetise its vast online presence the proposal is likely to be revisited.
The Scott Trust, which owns GMG, is mandated to "to secure the financial and editorial independence of the Guardian in perpetuity" but that duty does not extend to the Observer.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















3 comments
If J.K.Rowling posted an unabridged version of all Harry Potter books online, who would buy a book? It is the same principle with newspapers, as long as editors, incredibibly, continue to post that day's paper, from 1:00a.m of that day, they, editors are killing off their newspaper/s & ( quality) journalism as we know it.
Two suggestions: charge the reader for everything, leaving brief headlines free & crucially, charge services providers for freeloading the newspapers' material & use of copy.
The Observer needs fresh ownership or a decent burial.
Ironically, the reasons I don't buy the Observer are that:
it has become merely the Guardian on Sunday - one needs a change of paper on a Sunday
and that the bloated size of Saturday's Guardian precludes getting a further mass of newsprint on Sunday.
I used to love the Observer but over the years it has become more and more of a celebrity and fashion newspaper and less of a source of interesting, intelligent articles. There's pretty much no newspaper worth reading on a Sunday anymore. Bring back the quality and I'll happily reinstate the Sunday morning newspaper ritual.