Boom in the gloom for capital goods

Amidst stagnation, there's one ray of hope

Up on the month and still down on the year. Today’s UK production figures (from the ONS) can be taken either way. Stagnation after a brief and half-hearted recovery really does seem to be the conclusion as manufacturing output has seen three month on month rises in the last six months, and three falls. Total production output has been weaker than manufacturing (two-thirds of the total) for months due to the dismal performance from the North Sea but the annual decline in May is, at least, the least negative since September last year.

UK Index of Production from Timetric

The striking trend in the last couple of years has been the rise in the output of capital goods. The reason for this strength is not entirely clear other than to make the relative comparison, namely to point to the well-known weaknesses in consumer demand and mining (mainly North Sea oil) output. Until one of those two sectors picks up, there is little chance of a real recovery.

UK Index of Production from Timetric

Manufatcuring output is divided into a number of components. The chart below shows the strongest and weakest of the 13 sub-sectors in the recovery phase, post-2008. Output of transport, electrical and other equipment has grown strongly while wood, computing and basic pharmaceuticals have experienced no recovery at all.

Originally posted at

An oil rig. Energy is one of the flagging sectors. Photograph: Getty Images

Simon is the vice president (product) at Timetric

Show Hide image

No, David Cameron’s speech was not “left wing”

Come on, guys.

There is a strange journalistic phenomenon that occurs when a party leader makes a speech. It is a blend of groupthink, relief, utter certainty, and online backslapping. It happened particularly quickly after David Cameron’s speech to Tory party conference today. A few pundits decided that – because he mentioned, like, diversity and social mobility – this was a centre-left speech. A leftwing speech, even. Or at least a clear grab for the liberal centre ground. And so that’s what everyone now believes. The analysis is decided. The commentary is written. Thank God for that.

Really? It’s quite easy, even as one of those nasty, wicked Tories, to mention that you actually don’t much like racism, and point out that you’d quite like poor children to get jobs, without moving onto Labour's "territory". Which normal person is in favour of discriminating against someone on the basis of race, or blocking opportunity on the basis of class? Of course he’s against that. He’s a politician operating in a liberal democracy. And this isn’t Ukip conference.

Looking at the whole package, it was actually quite a rightwing speech. It was a paean to defence – championing drones, protecting Britain from the evils of the world, and getting all excited about “launching the biggest aircraft carriers in our history”.

It was a festival of flagwaving guff about the British “character”, a celebration of shoehorning our history chronologically onto the curriculum, looking towards a “Greater Britain”, asking for more “national pride”. There was even a Bake Off pun.

He also deployed the illiberal device of inculcating a divide-and-rule fear of the “shadow of extremism – hanging over every single one of us”, informing us that children in UK madrassas are having their “heads filled with poison and their hearts filled with hate”, and saying Britain shouldn’t be “overwhelmed” with refugees, before quickly changing the subject to ousting Assad. How unashamedly centrist, of you, Mr Prime Minister.

Benefit cuts and a reduction of tax credits will mean the Prime Minister’s enthusiasm for “equality of opportunity, as opposed to equality of outcome” will be just that – with the outcome pretty bleak for those who end up losing any opportunity that comes with state support. And his excitement about diversity in his cabinet rings a little hollow the day following a tubthumping anti-immigration speech from his Home Secretary.

If this year's Tory conference wins the party votes, it’ll be because of its conservative commitment – not lefty love bombing.

Anoosh Chakelian is deputy web editor at the New Statesman.