Opinionomics | 25 April 2012

Must-read comment and analysis. Featuring austerity, double-dips, and space.

1. How Planetary Resources Can Make a Profit (Forbes)

Tim Worstall tackles the problem Planetary Resources has - once they bring down all that platinum, platinum stops being as valuable.

2. To bin or not to bin the FTT (Financial Times | alphaville)

Masa Serdarevic argues out that the UK not joining the FTT if the rest of Europe starts one would be terrible for the City.

3. Why Are Donations to Government So Small? (Library of Economics and Liberty)

Bryan Caplan argues that most people think "that there are better and more efficient ways of using their money to help other people than giving it to government."

4. The Chancellor must ignore this double-dip recession (Telegraph)

Jeremy Warner calls for Osborne to tie himself to the mast of the good ship Austerity.

5. People Are Finally Figuring Out: Austerity is Stupid (The Bonddad Blog)

And Hale Stewart points out that that would be a terrible idea.

Planetary Resources president and chief engineer, Chris Lewicki, talks about the Arkyd Seris I satellite, seen as a full-scale mockup. Photograph: Getty Images

Alex Hern is a technology reporter for the Guardian. He was formerly staff writer at the New Statesman. You should follow Alex on Twitter.

Getty
Show Hide image

Children from "just managing" families most excluded from grammar schools

Shadow education secretary Angela Rayner said grammar schools "offer nothing to most kids".

Children from "just about managing" families are unlikely to benefit from an expansion of grammar schools because they don't get accepted in the first place, research from the Sutton Trust has found.

The educational charity also found that disadvantaged white British pupils were the least likely among a range of ethnic groups to get access to elite state school education. 

Shadow education secretary Angela Rayner said: “The Tories are failing our children. They should be delivering a country that works for everyone but all they have to offer is a plan to build an education system that only helps a handful of already privileged children.

"The evidence is clear - grammar schools reinforce advantage and offer nothing to most kids."

Theresa May launched her premiership with both a pledge to make Britain work for the "just managing" families (consequently termed Jams), and a promise to consider expanding grammar schools. 

The Sutton Trust researchers used the Income Deprivation Affecting Children index to compare access rates to those defined "just about managing" by the Resolution Foundation. 

They found that even non-disadvantaged pupils living in deprived neighbourhoods are barely more likely to attend grammar schools than those in the poorest. The report stated: "This is a strong indication that the ‘just managing’ families are not being catered for by the current grammar school system."

The Sutton Trust also found different ethnic groups benefited differently from grammar schools.

Disadvantaged Black pupils made up just 0.8 per cent of pupils in 2016, while disadvantaged white British pupils made up roughly 0.7 per cent, although disadvantaged white non-British children fared slightly better. Among disadvantaged groups, Asian pupils made up a substantial proportion of grammar school pupils. 

Sutton Trust chairman Sir Peter Lampl said: “Today’s research raises concerns about the government’s plans to use new grammars as a vehicle for social mobility. We need to get existing grammars moving in the right direction before we consider expanding their number.”

Julia Rampen is the editor of The Staggers, The New Statesman's online rolling politics blog. She was previously deputy editor at Mirror Money Online and has worked as a financial journalist for several trade magazines.