Don't be fooled by the employment increase

Total unemployment is the highest since 1994 -- under-25s and northerners are bearing the brunt.

No amount of spin can get around the fact that there was bad news yesterday from the Office for National Statistics on the labour market. This was not much of a surprise given that the data from several qualitative surveys has been less than stellar over the past few weeks. The KPMG/Rec Report on Jobs also showed that permanent placements fell for a third month running in December, while temporary billings were also down for the first time in 29 months. The British Chamber of Commerce's Quarterly Survey for Q4 2011 suggested that firms were once again shaking out workers.

Firms reported in the survey over the least few months had employment falling at a faster pace than previously in both manufacturing and services. Expectations for employment over the next few months fell in both sectors, and precipitously so in manufacturing.

The big news was the largely unexpected increase in the unemployment rate; up 0.3 per cent on the quarter and up 0.1 per cent on the month to 8.4 per cent -- the highest it has been since the end of 1996. The total number of unemployed now stands at 2,658,000; the highest it has been since the autumn of 1994. The number of unemployed looks set to hit the three million mark this year, as the economy heads back into recession.

In other news, employment on the quarter was up 18,000 but -- as can be seen from the table -- this was driven entirely by older folks aged 65 and over. The burden of rising unemployment and declinign employment is falling disproportionately on people under age 50.

 

The numbers of youngsters under age 25 who are unemployed now stands at 1,043,000 -- giving an appalling unemployment rate of 22.3 per cent. Forty four per cent of the increase in unemployment on the quarter was accounted for by youngsters.

Some coalition supporters tried to wriggle their way out of this bad news. On his blog, David Smith continued his theme that there isn't really a youth unemployment problem, arguing that:

The rise in youth unemployment looks to be mainly a full-time student phenomenon.

Excluding them, there was an increase of just 8,000 over the latsst (sic) three months. Including them, there was a rise of 52,000.

The numbers on the quarter are below. As in every country in the EU, the youth employment count includes full-time students in part-time jobs, while the youth unemployment count includes full-time students and unemployed searching for part-time jobs.

 

Smith conveniently failed to point out that the increase in employment among those in full-time education entirely explains the overall increase in employment but doesn't exclude them from the overall count. The decline in youth jobs is driven entirely by those who are not full-time students.

Excluding full-time students, there was an decline of just 48,000 over the latest three months. Including them, there was a decline of 28,000.

Sorry, good try David, but you can't have it both ways. Fiddling the figures doesn't work.

Other bad news on the labour market was that:

  1. The number of full-time jobs was down 57,000 on the quarter
  2. There are 590,000 people who have temporary jobs because they can't find permanent jobs
  3. There are a further 1.3 million who have a part-time job because they can't get a full time job
  4. Earnings rose by 2.1 per cent on the quarter and the month, so despite the drop in the CPI this month, workers are still receiving real wage cuts.
  5. Unemployment rates are now in double digits in the North East (12.0 per cent) and Yorkshire and the Humber (10.0 per cent).

In response to all this, Employment Minister Chris Grayling said yesterday:

The overall level of unemployment is, and will remain, a major concern for the government. The latest figures reflect the current challenging economic climate . . . Despite the exceptionally difficult economic circumstances, finding work for the unemployed will remain top of the government's agenda.

Top of the agenda? Doesn't exactly look that way does it, as unemployment heads inexorably upwards? I dread to think what is happening to policies further down the government's agenda!

It remains clear that the government is not finding work for the unemployed. Maybe it's time for a trip to the North East, Chris, to see how well your strategy isn't working?

62 comments

matthew fox's picture

Inastew, I wish you remembered the dross you have written.

You keep changing your mind why car production ceased at Dagenham, now your trying to blame this on Labour strangely upsetting Ford.

How very sad Inastew.

matthew fox's picture

A few days ago, the Federation of Small Businesses issued a survey showing that some of their members were going to shed jobs over the next few months.

Yet another piece of information the Right love to ignore and keep quiet about.

I hope people haven't forget, that Cameron promised the creation of 2,000,000 private jobs over the lifetime of this parliament.

David Blanchflower1's picture

Matthew
Note that in the pre-budget forecast of June 2010 - that is the economy this government inherited - the OBR forecast in Table 3.1 that unemployment in 2012 would be 7.4%.

http://budgetresponsibility.independent.gov.uk/wordpress/docs/pre_budget...

Their forecasts for employment were 29.0 million in 2011; 29.3 in 2012; 29.6 in 2013 and 29.9 in 2014.

By the November 200 Budget the numbers had fallen to
29.2 in 2011; 29.1 in 2012; 29.2 in 2013 and only 29.4 in 2014, down half a million from 18 months earlier.

(http://cdn.budgetresponsibility.independent.gov.uk/Autumn2011EFO_web_ver...)

Employment in sept-Nov 2011 according to yesterday's ONS release was 29.119 million and falling. They are forecasting a unemployment rate in 2012 of 8.7%.

Looks like they are going to have to revise down their employment estimates once again.
Danny Blanchflower

Awake!'s picture

@ Sir michael
I see the lawyer you recommended to Obi wan for won personal injury lawyer ward for 2011.
They woudn't push a case for money then haha...

Awake!'s picture

poor foxy
he's been going on about lagarde attacking osborne for 6 months... onto some other nonsense foxy.
Mr Blanchflower, last year you were paid by NS to write a piece which you titled 'lagardes damniung attack on Osbornoimics'or something like that- I arguesd it was politically motivated garbage and it was clear to see from her speech u were talking rubbish. Now I'm right.
Where are you on this?? is this like your economic arguments?? turns out u were wrong all along??
'Former French finance minister Christine Lagarde (right) recently recommended that some governments had scope to slow down austerity measures in the face of strong economic headwinds.

But yesterday she stated that the UK is not one of them. “Those countries that have fiscal space and that can slow down their fiscal consolidation efforts are very few, and I’m afraid Britain is not in that particular group,” '
Why do we keep having to hear your views that goy us into this mess-AWAKE!!!!!
Where is the English lion's heart? we keep getting served drivel as research/ideas, we're rightly not interested since we are LIONS after all... and then the clowns blow the econmy up...
They must pay their price... all those who supported their nonsense also

matthew fox's picture

More magic from Cameron, another flagship policy on unemployment.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/jan/21/david-cameron-work-progra...

quattro man's picture

Maggie (the greatest leader ever) managed to win several elections with very high unemployment.

It is just useless layabout socialist losers who can't get a job.

There are loads of jobs out there, you loony lefities just need to understand about working for a living for the fisrt time in your pathetic lives.

The public sector gravy train has been decommissioned, time to get a life.

Pobinr's picture

1trillion = aprox £33,000 owed per tax payer yet no need to be concerned !
Ridiculous. No wonder we are so far in debt we're almost losing our credit rating if that's the attitude.

Pobinr's picture

One other thing.
What did Gordon Brown squander most of it on ?
Quangos & other junk that's never going to create wealth but instead be a burden & black hole for taxes along with the interest payments just to even service the loan let alone pay it off.

Luddite's picture

"Total unemployment is the highest since 1994 -- under-25s and northerners are bearing the brunt". And having 371,000 immigrants on benefits. Doesn’t help our -- under 25s and northerners. You’re quite right Mr Blanchflower few are fooled by these employment figures. And David how many of these unemployed are folks who have being moved from long-term sickness benefit back onto the unemployment register?

matthew fox's picture

Another nail in Osborne Economic Strategy.

Begbies Traynor has warned that the UK economy has hit rock bottom with company distress biting across almost every sector and region.

The company's Red Flat Alert - a quarterly benchmark of company distress - shows a 24% year-on-year increase of companies facing 'critical' levels of financial distress in the fourth quarter.

Many key sectors face significant rises in critical financial distress, including:

* Automotive - 14% increase

* Construction - 13%

* General retailing - 26%

* Professional services - 61%

* Property services - 30%

* Travel and tourism - 56%

And it says the South East's resilience to the recession is punctured with a 33% year-on-year increase in 'critical' distress and 19% rise in London.

Scotland also shows increased critical financial distress, as the public sector cuts now start to bite.

matthew fox's picture

Look here Cloddite, still swinging with your chin?

I have heard you box in two categories, deadweight and lightweight.

The reason we have 300,000 unemployed Cloddite, is that they don't have jobs, pretty simple concept to understand lol.

What is your next stupid comment going to be.

I wonder if Privet has got around to finding you how the economy is going grow by 3% in 2013.

Indu Pendent's picture

@matt

did you not do Netwons 3rd law at school (may be you too went to a 'satifactory' comprehensive and so are self taught)

Its all about action and reaction.

Labour caused it -- after all it was you who highlighted the biggoted prejudice towards people who had right wing views which were put ahead of the national interest.

matthew fox's picture

Meter, please stop trying to discredit the facts.

Exports are down, it is simple as that, and we are importing more as well.

What happened to the much vaunted export led recovery?

The right are trying to blame the eurozone, yet trade outside europe has headed south.

Come on Meter, ignorance of the facts isn't a defence.

I see NHS waiting lists have rocketed under Cameron, up by 42.8%.

Ye how the right are so wrong.

matthew fox's picture

Cloddite, still nothing worthwhile to contribute, is your " mate " still hard Ed Balls?

matthew fox's picture

super sorry, it should read " Yes how the right are so wrong "

Privet's picture

Christine Lagarde gave an interview tonight that the UK coalition was pursuing the correct economic policy of Austerity, at the right speed. In her view and shared with consensus in IMF it was not an option to spend our way out of this problem.

And growth forecast for 2012 & more in 2013 that would ease unemployment.

Although unemployment would have been helped if Labour had saved some during the boom years to spend on infrastructure spending during the downturn. Wishfull thinking

Poor Christine & the IMF obviously hadnt read Dannys cobbled together article

matthew fox's picture

I re-read your awful comments again Privet, and it is still a total waste webspace.

Can your explain to me how the country will grow by 3%?

The BCC have forecasted growth at 1.8%, the IMF have forecasted growth of 2.0%

I take it you have evidence to back up your theory.

Are you just stupid for the sake of it Privet?

Luddite's picture

HELLO!! Who ever said Labour's debt reduction would be easy? Labour spent 13 year's decimating the private sector with its endless tax rises and regulations in order to squander on the public sector. Welcome back to the real world. Welcome to Labour’s legacy. Are you finding it awfully tough lost your final salary pension, no pay rise, having to compete in a shrinking Labour market with thousands of immigrants workers willing to work for f**k-all. That's what millions of working-class English people deal with on daily basis has-done-for-years. It's your own political elite that find itself with its political knickers in a twist. Who ever said Labour’s [DEBT] reduction would be short lived and painless, after the billions squandered by Labour on state education, why do we find many employers looking to employ overseas graduates? The social and economic damage inflicted on this country by the now totally discredited Labour party will take over a decade to repair. I desperately hope Mr. Balls ever holds that little red box, because if he ever did this country would sink into the abyss. Labour now clearly understands its mistakes. But what is your alterative more Socialism? Businesses need a strong stable government. At this moment Labour offers no credible alternative to responsible government.

quattro man's picture

Yawn, I see David "I dont do solutions" Blanchflower is back with his usual tripe.

Fortunately the British public see the truth:

YouGov poll on 19th Jan 2012 has topline figures of CON 41%, LAB 38%, LDEM 8%. It’s the biggest Conservative lead YouGov have shown since December 2010

trevor marwood's picture

Jen
You drive people off the register and fiddle the figures.Its an old Tory trick that keeps trolls like you happy!!

Awake!'s picture

Happy new year Mr Blanchflower, and thanks for delivering the papers!!

I particularly enjoyed the analysis of how we got here and your solutions on going forward,but missed your thoughts on the labour shadow chancellor of the United Kingdom's (a small island next to Europe) recent comments.

Indu Pendent's picture

@matt

"you haven't been prepared to blame Jack Nasser until now"

What are you on about now? Are you looking for an opportunitistic bandwagon to jump on or something?

You lost that argument a long time ago. As you correctly highlighted and worked out for yourself, arrogant Labour biggots hacked off Jack (you said because of his right wing point of view -- but business is business and Labour should not have let its ideology get in the way of British jobs) and would not extend the support to Ford to retool Dagenham because of it. It would have been less money than Labour pissed away each week before 2008. Thats historical fact Matt. Only the elite that your supported can blame itself for putting their own greedy interests first rather than the nation's interest.

Why didnt Labour spend more of the £350Bn it borrowed before 2008 on affordable housing? Was it something to do with using the money in other ways to win votes?

Privet's picture

Matt Fox- the 3% forecast is from a well known organisation, i dont know if you will have heard of them, they are called the Bank of England?

I see you have posted more diarrhea further back..'Businesses are laying off British Workers Cloddite, business confidence is in the toilet Cloddite, Exports to Non EU countries are failing Cloddite, welcome to Osborne's discredited world Cloddite, the world of mass unemployment on an industrial scale.'

You see Matt if Labour hadnt allowed so many foreign workers to arrive on our shores, we would be able to offer our own youth employment.

Also Matt if labour had saved a little during the boom years we could be spending on infrastructure now & easing unemployemnt, cant you see how simple it is Matt?

No cohesive arguements from you at all during these posts Matt only name calling, very immature & sad you cannot put together a reasonable debate? are you still at school? if so what year and what are you studying?

Richard's picture

Quattro Man,

You left out the approval rating for this Government from the YouGov survey, which is -21%. This shows 53% of those surveyed disaproving of the Government's record to date, 32% approving and 15% who didn't know.

So it would be more accurate to say (if this is a representative sample) that more than half of the people in the country dissaprove of this Government while less than one in three people approve of it.

Richard's picture

Of course it would also be more accurate if I spelt disapproving and disapprove correctly.

Apologies - typed in haste.

Indu Pendent's picture

@matt

General construction is cyclical. It will catch up in a couple of year time for any reduction now. When it does it stimulates the economy and the challenge will be for the government to hold it down. Labour to totally incapable of doing this which is why they messed up the UK economy (fixing the roof whilst the Sun shines).

You are right about Manufacturing. It is declining but at a slower rate than under the last government inspite of the recession. How do you explain that Matt?

The OBR is building up its experience and information base so its forecasting is getting better e.g. they should have given more weight to the predicting the Euro crisis and its impact. It might take the OBR 5 years to get fully up to speed. But the OBR is a growing asset to the UK.

At least now the forecasts used by the government are done independently and are not biased by Ed Balls or anyone else to support the governments objectives. The nation is so much better off for the OBR.

Miliband supports the OBR. He does not want Labour to go back to the Ed Balls days.

Jen's picture

Oh how the 2,658,000 unemployed sticks in the craw of the 'left' who were promising us it would be at least three and a half million by now with the Tories in.

Labour bequeathed the coalition the first 2,500,000, so it's only a small fraction of the dole queues that can be put down to the Liberals and the Tories.

Obi Wan Kenobi's picture

Quote:

Iain Duncan Smith's popular promise to reform the system to "make work pay"

Response:

Well Ian Duncan Smith - how can you seriously make work pay if all your doing is putting the unemployed on the useless 'Work Programme', then the private providers put you on a placement at a firm or charity for 30 hours a week and don't pay you, they expect you to do this for your dole money, but say's nothing about the profits you'll earn for that firm while your working there for free, THAT'S SLAVE LABOUR - PURE AND SIMPLE - AND IT IS ILLEGAL. I hope the unions and high courts are reading this and put a stop to the 'Work Programme' immediately.

The law states the national minimum wage is £6 odd an hour.

Obi Wan Kenobi's picture

I'm on the Work Programme and if they make me do unpaid work on a placement I will stand outside that firm with a placard stating that: THIS FIRM (INCLUDE NAME OF FIRM)GETS THE UNEMPLOYED (ME) TO WORK FOR THEM FOR FREE AND PAYS THEM (ME) NO WAGES, WITH FULL GOVERNMENT APPROVAL!

I encourage anyone sent to work at a firm or charity for free to do this.

matthew fox's picture

5 years to get up to speed, howls of laughter you silly sausage.

The sun always shines on the righteous Inastew, is that why you are always in the dark?

Will Construction catch up in the same way, that we will catch up with US economic growth, Inastew, remember that howler.

When you say Manufacturing is declining slower, do you domestically or exporting sector?

Don't forget the euro Inastew, a weak euro will only hurt more British Jobs and increase our woeful trade deficit.

You have stopped talking about trade deficits for a while Inastew, why is that ?

matthew fox's picture

Privet, come on your daft sausage.

When did the BofE forecast 3% growth.

It can't have been Nov 11, they predicted 2.5%.

So just to get your story straight Privet, when did the BofE forecast 3% growth?

Obi Wan Kenobi's picture

I really wish channel 4's programme 'Dispatches' would investigate the governments new Work Programme fully.

From the Jobcentre referral to the private provider, to being passed on to one of their partners, to being put on a placement at a firm and not paid for the time they are working there.

I wonder how many firms and private providers are profiterring from this.

Madison's picture

From the Jobcentre referral to the private provider, to being passed on to one of their partners, to being put on a placement at a firm and not paid for the time they are working there. I wonder how many firms and private providers are profiterring from this. http://www.zebrarestaurant.com

Indu Pendent's picture

@privet
Danny is under pressure to lets his political allegance influence his independent professional judgement. He should make it clearer which is wins through.

matthew fox's picture

Do you mean Sir Isaac Newton Inastew?

@Privet, what growth in 2012, didn't the IMF slash the growth forecast to 0.6%, so how will that ease unemployment?

Unemployment is forecasted to rise in 2012, and peak in 2013.

Back to the drawing board Privet, better look next time.

Robert Taggart's picture

Not fooled - just do not care...
just wish the political class would leave us happy peaceful scroungers alone !

matthew fox's picture

Cameron and Osborne said it would be easy Cloddite, no Vat rises, no lay off, just cutting the fat.

Businesses are laying off British Workers Cloddite, business confidence is in the toilet Cloddite, Exports to Non EU countries are failing Cloddite, welcome to Osborne's discredited world Cloddite, the world of mass unemployment on an industrial scale.

Indu Pendent's picture

@matt

The trade deficit is awful. The measures to fix it are
- higher VAT (think Denmark) as in import tarriff and to progressively tax domestic consumption
- lower CT to attract profits to the UK
- AAA and QE to help devalue the currency
- cut government borrowing to reduce imports sucked in
- etc

In other words, dont vote Labour.

Go back and look at history for 500 years to understand construction. Buildings get built, its just a question of when.

Government sponsored building is different. Take Labour and affordable houses for example.

Why will not say whether you agree with Bob Crow? Is it because you disagree with him but cant diss a friend?

Pitty Labour shut Dagenham Fiesta. It was you who pointed out the biggorty of the Labour elite. They hacked off the US management team.

Sir Michael's picture

@Obi Wan - If you are really on the work program you need to contact Public Interest Lawyers immediately. They have a contact us address on their website.

http://www.publicinterestlawyers.co.uk/

The more people contact them about this the greater the odds of their success. They are indeed challenging this legislation under antislavery laws.

Indu Pendent's picture

@matt
Er what? Now you are making it up telling it through your teeth. How very Labour spin.

Go read all the other posts and your concurrence to the reasons behind the massive damaged done by Labour to UK manufacturing. What they did to a "grubby" manufactures like the jewell of Dagenham Fiesta was just a start. Not enough champaign and canopes City brunches at important meetings at Dagenham unfortunately for all those good people.

Indu 1 Fox 0 (remember)

Joker's picture

So this is where all the Tory trolls live then! Bless. Not a grain of good sense between them.

Tony montana's picture

Unemployment and statistics mean fa the fact its coming down is based on slave labour workfare schemes created by jobcentre tesco, asda, pound strecher, a4e, placements no real jobs or living wage to get you off the dole just gimmicks.

matthew fox's picture

Super sorry it should read " Exports to Non EU countries are falling "

Marco's picture

Prof Blanchflower are you ever going to pen an article on the historic low interest rates and deficit coming in under target?

Anyone would think you were just a member of the labour party just following a script, than someone I could respect even if I disagreed with their premise.

Pick and choose Prof, that's what you do.

quattro man's picture

You have no idea of how bad it is going to get for you loony lefties.

This great revolutionary coalition government is going to make you lazy layabouts pay....and will win the next election at walking pace...it is so funny. Justice at at last.

Indu Pendent's picture

@matt

Its basic maths Matt (since you dont know Newtons laws doubt you are strong at adding up either) but 2.5% is rounded to 3%. Are you sure you did not go to a Labour comprehensive as bad as mine - I watched the Labour philosophy in action destroying hundreds of kids opportunities?

1) Matt, suppose we have 300,000 public sector workers recruited by Labour with the £350Bn the borrowed but who we can no longer afford to pay. They cost an average of £30k per year for the state to keep.

If we cut the roles through natural attrition and unemployment benefit costs the state £7k per year, what is the deficit reduction effect?

2) If we have 300,000 imported workers who cant find a job but live on UK benefits which are better than at home, what is the cost to the UK tax payer?

3) What is the interest on the £350Bn borrowed by Labour before 2008 and how many jobs has it cost the economy?

trevor marwood's picture

@ Pobinr
"G.B. squandering money"
Some of us have memories longer than that of a gnat !
After Tory mark 1 18 years of asset stripping and sell offs of the family silver the country was in a large hole.
Hospitals run down for Mark1 privatisation,School bomb sites with leaking roofs,40 to a class and 4 books between them !!
Thats the thing about you blinkered neocon enablers you know the cost of everything and the value of nothing.
I only have to read the above vitriol to confirm what a sad little country of Im alright jack curtain twitchers we are !!

Privet's picture

Matt you silly chipolata

British Chambers of Commerce (BCC).

The report predicts the UK economy will remain stunted until mid 2012 at which point growth will accelerate.

Accelerate Matt to create jobs, its a shame we didnt have reserves in between 2009- 2013 to help our unemployed Matt thats the real hardship, why did Labour cause such a deficit Matt? please explain if you have any comments other than offensive name calling
you never seem to answer anything, why is that?

Indu Pendent's picture

@Danny

"Looks like they are going to have to revise down their employment estimates once again"

Thats what happends by making the forecasting function independent. It gets steadily more realistic.

Its fair to say that 100ks of retail jobs are being shed because of the switch to online, rising import prices and people learning to live within their means. These jobs lost are largely low skilled low paid typically done by young people. The UK's biggest employer, the state, is also slowing the rate of recruitment.

Lets reflect a moment
AAA
£1=$1.54
growth = +/- 1%
Deficit falling
CT falling
End of advisory Rem report vote
Diversifation of education
FCUK veto to the French
3%-4%pa real labor cost realignment/competitiveness improvement
etc

So what exactly are the coalition doing wrong? And what would EB and EM do differently?

Unemployment is painful medicine but realigns expectations to those of our competitors. It is an asset in the long term.

Latest tweets