Why banks must be independent of ignorant politicians
Four top Republicans write an open letter to the Federal Reserve.
By David Blanchflower Published 21 September 2011 16:36
I have just read the dumbest letter ever. I have copied it below. It's a letter from the four top Republicans in Congress to Chairman Bernanke. It urges the Fed to do nothing because: "It could exacerbate current problems or further harm the US economy."
I have never heard such unsubstantiated tosh. It is unclear how lengthening the duration of assets held on its balance sheet could cause harm. This is a bit rich after the ridiculous shenanigans by the Republicans over the debt ceiling, which led to a downgrade. The risk of inflation is diminishing by the hour. These guys really have no idea. This really does illustrate well why central banks need to be independent of ignorant political interference.
Fortunately, the Fed will ignore them and instigate, perhaps, the $500bn Operation Twist today. It probably raised the prospects of the Fed acting as it's likely to have annoyed FOMC members who value their independence.
Dear Chairman Bernanke,
It is our understanding that the Board Members of the Federal Reserve will meet later this week to consider additional monetary stimulus proposals. We write to express our reservations about any such measures.
Respectfully, we submit that the board should resist further extraordinary intervention in the U.S. economy, particularly without a clear articulation of the goals of such a policy, direction for success, ample data proving a case for economic action and quantifiable benefits to the American people.
It is not clear that the recent round of quantitative easing undertaken by the Federal Reserve has facilitated economic growth, or reduced the unemployment rate . . . we have serious concerns that further intervention by the Federal Reserve could exacerbate current problems or further harm the U.S. economy.
Sincerely, Sen. Mitch McConnell, Rep. John Boehner, Sen. Jon Kyl, Rep. Eric Cantor.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















16 comments
Central banks. are the single biggest cause of debt in the world. The Americans had the sense to avoid such an institution for many years... As Jefferson said " "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
And lo it has come to pass......
It seems to be the case that though there exist a great many monetary and fiscal tools, many Republicans believe that all the ones that aren't spending cuts are either directly opposed to the Lord's will or the brainchildren of Lenin (or both, I suppose).
The Federal Reserve has been around for a while. Why is it suddenly such a political issue?
It always makes me worry when Bankers think they knwo what is better for the Nation rather than the politicians. Bankers are a special interest group and I wonder how wide their experience is of the world. I also get jittery about the intervention of American Republicans in politics because of their very close ties with Bankers and Big Business.
Bankers are just as bad as the politicians. They are all part of the same class and share the same world-view.
Bankers are as 'independent' as the politicians. Both of them are part of problem.
Guillotine the lot of 'em!
@danny
QE is a waist of time except for the acceletation in reduction or relative wages. Its proven there is no lasting impact on growth. QE cant be targeted directly at UK industry (or may be it can without passing through the hands of consumers?)
The letter is spot on, especially the "benefits to the American people". Bring it on.
Simplist fiscal stimulus by a UK government would have to be called 'Operation Bent'.
@matt
Foxy, before conrete evidence broke about phone hacking and the bandwagon started to role, Labour said nothing at all about it. However, I remember phone hacking was well known back in 2002.
With the sexing up of the treasury forecasts is it a case of "Here we go again" - Milliband waiting for a new bandwagon before doing anything? He could be supporting the OBR (BTW which was set up because it was widely known the Treasury had been manipulated by Gordon and Balls). I know you dont like the OBR - we could go be back to the good old days where corruption did not exist because the government turned a blind eye to it when it was not perpetrating it.
@danny
Do you know whether Ed Balls sexed up the treasury forecasts to produce fabricated data to support Labour borrowing before 2008?
The history books are being written as we speak and have your name in them. You need to start defending yourself now and distancing yourself from the corruption.
On the contrary - lets remember not long ago the governor of our Bank of England was telling everyone concerned that banks should become more boring. I take this to mean in terms of basic simple accountability first ie where something can actually be counted in a way that everyone can understand.
This letter strikes me as a reasonable statement of the usual concerns. We've heard them all before anyway. Personally I tend to see the difficulties expressed here in terms of a paradigm clash - how can we reconcile or even endow the traditional conservative ways and means with the necessary evangelical type intervention? When this on the face of it ( ie common, reasonable accountability ) might seem to come from out of nowhere.
The letter begs the question... how do the GOP intend to stimulate and nurture an economic recovery?
Probably by praying really hard.
We're all f***ed.
You're right Indu Pendent. The whole Treasury was suborned by Balls into producing false data and not one civil servant could reveal the truth such was his reign of terror.
Thank God you've exposed this cesspit of corruption.
Indu Pendent is talking about a book, which alleges Ed Balls lent on Treasury officials to produce favourable economic forecasts. Unfortunately, there is no smoking gun, all we get is unnamed sources, officials with no names.
I take it there is an email trail, or a sworn statement implicating Ed Balls?
Strange how it has taken years for these allegations to surface. How could such serious misconduct, have been buried for so many years?
indu don't interact with fox he'll only start confusing the budget deficit with the national debt, then just make up rambling facts unsupported by any evidence. Actually he's a fictious cartoon character I've created from an orwellian future who views are best summed up as "Labour Good, Tory Bad".
Actually one guy recently piped up about how he was being lent on to use not credible forecasts. That's sort of a smoking gun isn't it, him being the Chancellor at the time.
@ Benedict- u don't need to lean on the whole treasury, just a couple of people would do...
Given US long run interest rates are at post war lows the problem with the economy does not seem to be the cost of finance.
Businesses are holding back investing due to expectations of low returns on future investment. This is due to low expected growth and fiscal uncertainty, with a 10% deficit, its likely US taxes will rise at some point without any blueprint for how the government will balance the economy businesses clearly face the risk of higher taxes on future profits.
The aim of operation twist is to lower long term interest rates. But interest rates aren't the problem the problem is a lack of short term demand combined with medium & long term fiscal uncertainty.
Operation twist will be as effective as curing a diabetic with chemotherapy. LOL.
Danny, the letter is only dumb from an economic point of view. These guys are not economists they are politicians. It is in their interest for the Fed to do nothing and let the economy continue its downturn as we move to the 2012 elections.
The passive language they use - 'could' as opposed to 'will' or 'would' - is proof that even they don't really believe that the Fed doesn't have a significant role to play in stimulating the economy.
The letter is pure 'populist' nonsense and the best response is to disregard completely or make the analytical case for Fed intervention.
Calling them stupid is just what they wanted and gives credence to the growing belief that the economists of today are just politicians by another name.