Cultural Capital

Reflections on books and the arts from the New Statesman culture desk

Syndicate contentRSS

Why Dredd 3D gets women in comics right

For a popcorn blockbuster, the gender politics of Dredd 3D are extraordinary, writes Laura Sneddon.

Judge Dredd (Karl Urban) kicks down a door while Judge Anderson (Olivia Thirlby)
Judge Dredd (Karl Urban) kicks down a door while Judge Anderson (Olivia Thirlby) covers him. Photograph: Lionsgate Pictures

Minor spoilers for Dredd 3d follow.

The last few years have seen comic books become the go-to source material for cinema, from Blade and X-Men right through to The Dark Knight Rises and Avengers. Most have featured women characters although those that focus solely on our favourite heroines are better forgotten in comparison to the glut of popular movies based on leading men. Team titles too have been hit and miss with women generally being judged for their looks before their character, although Helen Mirren and Angelina Jolie have both stolen the show in Red and Wanted respectively. Still, it was annoying for many fans to see Black Widow waving her ass in posters and always with that zipper down, despite her greater than expected screen time. Now one film has single-handedly bucked that trend, passing the Bechdel test, and with the best portrayal of women in an action film I have seen in years: Dredd.

Put simply, and this is extraordinary, there is no difference between the portrayal of male and female characters in this film. The women are not sexualised, weaker, shown less, or more emotional, and their wardrobes are genderless, but neither are they simply rendered as personality devoid hard-asses... The women characters are excellent characters who happen to be women.

Judge Dredd. Britain's favourite hero, dispensing the law in a future police state, satirising the very real and ever increasing threat of authoritarianism to our lives. Brutalised in a previous Sylvester Stallone movie that turned him from seriously stern Judge to camp crusader, Dredd is back with a grim and gritty film that harks back to his earliest strips.

Judge Anderson. A long-time friend of Dredd's, a tense friendship at times, Anderson is a female Judge with psychic powers. In the film we see Anderson as a rookie, sent out with Dredd on an evaluation run. Her outfit, her armour, is near identical to Dredd's - the singular difference being her lack of helmet, to better allow her psychic abilities. Anderson is portrayed as being more sympathetic than Dredd, but then again, so is just about every other Judge. In the comics, Anderson has been around since the early days and proved so popular that she headlines her own spin-off series, Anderson: Psi-Division.

Ma-Ma. The villain of the piece and a complete psychopath. This woman runs her criminal gang with an iron fist, torturing and killing anyone who disappoints her or stands in her way. Her domain is the Peach Trees 200 story tower block, housing those who are sworn to her, and others who live in fear. Ma-Ma does not slink her way around or use her womanly wiles; she is fucked up, brutal and efficient.

We open on Mega-City One, a massive city-state holding hundreds of millions of citizens in squalor on the east coast of North America, the result of an explosive population problem and a nuclear war that has devastated the surrounding environment. The low budget ensures that this is a near future, banged up cars and fashion not hugely different from our own; at one point a sole iPhone captures an event amongst the poverty of those around. Dredd (Karl Urban) is commanded by the Chief Judge (Rakie Ayola) to take a failed rookie out on assessment. Due to her exceptionally high psychic abilities, it is hoped that Anderson (Olivia Thirlby) will pass, despite Dredd's disapproval of this second chance.

We're told how few crimes the Judges can actually respond to, despite their numbers, and Anderson picks a triple homicide at Peach Trees: a warning shot from Ma-Ma (Lena Headey) who first skinned her victims, then fed them Slo-Mo - a drug that slows the perception of time to 1% - before tossing them from the 200th floor. The two Judges arrive, apprehending Kay (Wood Harris), one of Ma-Ma's leading gang members as Anderson detects his guilt in the skinning, before the block shuts down, giant blast shields trapping all within. It's unfortunate for the remaining film that The Raid came first as comparisons with Evans' film are inevitable, but the 3D lends Dredd an extra edge: the Slo-Mo drug provides a narrative reason for the 3D to take place, transporting you into the head of the user, frequently before violence occurs in beautifully ugly detail. Bullets shred people into meaty chunks, distort faces before bursting out through teeth and skin, while others fall to their deaths across the viewers vision, exploding upwards and outwards in shining arcs of flesh and blood.

As the Judges drag their prisoner behind them, Kay threatens Anderson with what is likely to happen to her, a pretty woman, when caught. Realising she is psychic he thinks of her in violent sexual situations with him, in a horrific moment almost targeted at those audience members wishing for more sex with their violence, shown their desires in its non-glamorised fucked up reality. Later Anderson interrogates him by stepping into her mind and Kay delights in tormenting her, only to find that she is the one with all the power. He imagines oral pleasure and instead finds his penis ripped from his pathetic body; coming to, he pisses himself. This particular trope happens a few times, with someone assuming they have power over Anderson only to find themselves very wrong, or very dead.

Ma-Ma is a different story. While Anderson is shown to be no more weak than her fellow male Judge, Ma-Ma is shown as being far more intelligent and sadistic than any of the men in her gang. She is utterly terrifying and cold, and it is perfectly easy to believe that the entire block is far more frightened of her than they are of the remote and isolated law. This is no prancing villainess in a bikini or split open dress; Ma-Ma is a blood soaked killer who always has a long term plan. There is even a scene with her in the bath which is completely non-sexualised, a level of welcome restraint that seems incredible. When Anderson is brought before her there is no flicker of emotion either way, she orders no torture not out of female solitude but because she can still see a way of coming out of this intact.

Original Dredd creator John Wagner was on hand as consultant throughout filming for writer and producer by Alex Garland, and nixed a scene where Anderson and Dredd kiss - Judge Dredd doesn't do romance, and neither does Anderson. Anderson does however show more empathy than her colleague at certain times due to her ability to see inside the minds of the perpetrators. She sees one of the gang members as having been tortured and kept there against his will and bases her judgement of him with that in mind. Earlier however, when hesitating over killing a man who begs for his life, she shoots. Sitting behind me at the cinema was long-time Judge Dredd artist Cam Kennedy, who nodded, "that's my girl!"

The satirical nature of Dredd as a character, that extrapolation of a future grounded in the frightening conservative politics of today, has meant that while Dredd has lived a long and prosperous life in the UK, he has never been welcomed in the US. The film needs to make budget to be granted a sequel, and it will be a crying shame if Anderson doesn't get a second outing alongside Joe Dredd.

Dredd is low budget but very ambitious and ultra-violent fare, an action thriller and, most unusually for a comic film, an 18/R certificate. There will be those who say this isn't the Dredd film we've been waiting for, that Urban isn't growly enough, or that his helmet isn't exactly as it should be. To me though, this is exactly the film that early Dredd strips deserve: the leaner, younger Dredd with the heavy violence and pressure cooker environment that the police state dictates, and the complete lack of sexism and misogyny that makes Dredd always such a great read. The cast, in their entirety, have nailed the restraint of characters living in this world.

And on top of all that, it's an action film where women are equal.

This piece was originally posted at Comic Book Grrrl.

35 comments

Sam in LV's picture

When a female character in a movie gets kicked in the crotch and everybody laughs, that's gender equality in on the big screen.

Jason3503's picture

Absolutely appalling article. Saying there is no misogyny. What a joke. So misandry and castrating and cruelty towards male characters and violence against men and boys is good? This is a disgraceful article about a disgraceful game. It's time we as a society wake up to the misandry so prevalent in our society and our computer games.

And a sexualised female character is called misogyny? So any male following his natural instincts and biological reality to find females sexy is a misogynist? This is feminism gone mad.

Sam in LV's picture

So true!

New statesman #7381's picture

I hate to break this to you, Laura Sneddon, but you are not a man and you never will be.

Manji's picture

This is a great article. I walked out of Dredd expressing a lot of the same sentiments (as did the other members of the group, who were either females or feminism-aware males) and we were actually a little bit surprised to realise just how much of a gender-equal film we'd just seen, due to that kind of film being so rare. Anderson is a strong and capable heroine who never backs down from a challenge and never falls into the 'damsel in distress' trope- even when the film looks like it might be going down that route it gets neatly turned around so that Dredd isn't the only badass cop in the film. This article gets it spot on.

Pavlova's picture

"The women characters are excellent characters who happen to be women."

Not really.

"Ma-Ma. The villain of the piece and a complete psychopath. This woman runs her criminal gang with an iron fist, torturing and killing anyone who disappoints her or stands in her way. "

A.K.A. The Witch

"Judge Anderson. A long-time friend of Dredd's, a tense friendship at times, Anderson is a female Judge with psychic powers. In the film we see Anderson as a rookie, sent out with Dredd on an evaluation run. Her outfit, her armour, is near identical to Dredd's - the singular difference being her lack of helmet, to better allow her psychic abilities."

A.K.A. The princess

"Judge Dredd. Britain's favourite hero, dispensing the law in a future police state, satirising the very real and ever increasing threat of authoritarianism to our lives. "

A.K.A. The knight.

Stan J's picture

Now I'm wondering what the Dreddverse sentence is for internet trolling.

Partly because I'm a potential suspect myself!

Stan J's picture

Judging by reaction to the leaked script I was actually under the impression there was a full blown sex scene involved. Though thinking about it, just the inclusion of a Dredd/Anderson kiss seems to conflict with Garland's image of a 2000AD fanboy. He shouldn't have needed John Wagner to tell him that was a mistake. I mean I'm pretty sure I've heard Garland criticise the Dredd/Hershey thing from the Stallone film so I'm a bit confused about that whole thing.

Joe Soap's picture

“Original Dredd creator John Wagner was on hand as consultant throughout filming for writer and producer by Alex Garland, and nixed a scene where Anderson and Dredd kiss – Judge Dredd doesn’t do romance, and neither does Anderson.”

Not totally true, you must take the context of the ‘kiss’ into account. It wasn’t a romantic kiss, even in the original script, it was the kiss-of-life. In one of the last scenes Anderson was unconscious so there was still no romatic connotation to the act, it was purely functional.
It was still cleverly written and a play on the platonic relationship between the two characters but the wound dressing in the lift worked better.

Stan J's picture

Thanks. I had a feeling there might be more to it but couldn't help myself. Needless conjecture is three fifths of the fanboy law.

Sir Marky's picture

Don't you think you're over analysing what is just a bit of comic book entertainment for adults?

The characters are well known for decades now.

Joe Soap's picture

but nothing in the article is incorrect. Male and female charcters in Judge Dredd (2000AD) were always depicted in this way, unlike DC or Marvel.

PreacherCain's picture

"And to better allow her audience to see her pretty face and swishy hair while she uses her magical emotional intelligence."

Yet its accurate to the comics. PSI Judges don't tend to wear helmets, whether they're male or female, in the comics. Anderson herself rarely (if ever) wears a helmet in either Judge Dredd or her own strip. However, street Judges like Beeny, DeMarco and Hershey were about 50/50. Dredd is actually the only judge whose face you never see in the comics.

"A pretty, psychic rookie threatened with rape and a (beautiful?) evil villainess more deadly than the male, no no stereotypical sexist tropes to see here."

I think the film knows exactly what its doing in the first example and quite deflty turns that trope on its head. I guess you could accuse the film of having it both ways but I think overall the film portrays a female character who is as capable - professionally, physically and mentally - as her male counterparts and so that accusation carries little weight.

James W's picture

"Yet its accurate to the comics."
That's not a rebuttal.

PreacherCain's picture

I read the post correctly. The initial post was claiming that the film chose to have Anderson without a helmet so it could have a sexy female lead to show off; my rebuttal is that it was a decision that was more based on sticking close to the comic and had al ogic within the actual narrative too. The initial poster was attempting to force their interpretation on the film in spite of a large volume of evidence that suggests different.

Stan J's picture

I understand it can be taxing but perhaps you should read the entire paragraph next time. B)

PreacherCain's picture

And perhaps you could look to improve on your reading comprehension, eh?

Stan J's picture

Haha. I was talking to the other guy!

Pavlova's picture

"the singular difference being her lack of helmet, to better allow her psychic abilities"

And to better allow her audience to see her pretty face and swishy hair while she uses her magical emotional intelligence.

Lucky Wood's picture

What would it have taken, exactly, for you to like this film?

James W's picture

I agree with Pavlova, and I liked the film. Multivalence!

Pavlova's picture

A pretty, psychic rookie threatened with rape and a (beautiful?) evil villainess more deadly than the male, no no stereotypical sexist tropes to see here.

James W's picture

And who's that threatening the rape? The worstest, most rapingest baddie of all: A Black Man! Sci fi/fantasy loves this trope.

And Anderson's defeat of Kay - where he THINKS he's raping her, but instead has his penis bitten off by a MONSTER WOMAN - hardly feels like a triumph of feminism.

A well-written piece, but I'm afraid I think Pavlova has the right of it. On the helmet, too.

RorshachLives!'s picture

As a total right-winger (and thus agree with very little on this site), I nonetheless enjoyed this little article on 'Dredd', it is pretty accurate in it's assessment of so-called 'gender equality' (a PC term I would seldom use) in the film; Anderson is no wilting violet and can more than hold her own whilst maintaining sympathy and empathy with those she encounters, whilst Ma-Ma is basically a mirror reflection of Dredd only the latter commits violence in the name of law and order whilst the former does it for her own selfish ends... and it is Anderson who provides the middle ground to this intriguing dichotomy.

It's not just 'Dredd' that has led the way in gender equality in genre pieces, 'The X Files' did a pretty decent job of that over the years, James Cameron has been doing it for most of his films (the somewhat sleazy 'True Lies' being a notable exception), and good ol' Robert A. Heinlein - no doubt a favorite read with the good folk at The New Statesmen - was doing it in the likes of 'Starship Troopers' back in the 1950's... take that libs and fems everywhere!

Oh, one last thing, I wouldn't say 'Dredd' was "low budget" per se, it cost $45m to produce, that's still a decent chunk of change... especially for an independent British film made completely outside any U.S. studio or production house!

McMac's picture

Should we take this same genderless approach in say;

Health care
Family law
Social housing
Business grants
Criminal law
Prisoner funding
Social care
Workplace law

Should we, say, reduce funding for female only cancer research, and channel it to try and reduce the disproportionate male deaths from cancer. You know, now that the important comic book imbalance has been sorted.

I'm sure the ignored homless and suicidal men in the UK will be taking comfort from the reporting of this important issue.

Pavlova's picture

"disproportionate male deaths from cancer"
Evidence please.

McMac's picture

It’s not a contentious point. The simplest of searches will show imbalance in spending and resources towards female biased research and care, and higher cancer rates, and death rate in men. In fact there was an article about it in the NS not so long ago, but we’re not allowed to post links.

McMac's picture

..but of course this being the New Statesmen the story about the higher rate and death rate from cancer in men went through some logical summersaults and was presented as a piece about woman getting the raw and of the deal, because the gap in death rates had closed slightly…i.e. the writer wanted the disparity to be maintained.

Pavlova's picture

Evidence please, of *disproportionate* male deaths from cancer.

McMac's picture

What do you want me to do, point at some grave stones?

The death rate from cancer for men is bout 30% greater, nearly all cancers have a higher incedence in men. I can't put it any simpler.

If you want evidence spend 20 seconds on google.

Pavlova's picture

"What do you want me to do, point at some grave stones?"

No, some statistics will do.

"The death rate from cancer for men is bout 30% greater, nearly all cancers have a higher incedence in men. I can't put it any simpler."

That's not evidence of disproportion, that's evidence of a higher proportion.

If cancer in men occurs at a higher rate then you would expect a higher death rate. That doesn't establish that a greater proportion of men with cancer die than women with cancer, it definitely doesn't establish a correlation with research funding.

McMac's picture

No certainly doesn't. Despite the higher incidence and eath rate in men, more money is directed towards women.

How do you feel about that? I'm interested, you seem to be...how can I put it...very relaxed about the situation.

Hugh Jarse's picture

The difference in spending on research into breast cancer and prostate cancer, for example.

Pavlova's picture

Research spending does not correlate to death rates. They are different cancers with different rates of prevalence in the population, different available treatments and different survival rates.

McMac's picture

True. Spending per case on prostate cancer is around a tenth of that spent on breast cancer, though the number of deaths are similar. Lung cancer, more deadly than either prostate or breast cancer receives even less funding.

Latest tweets