Andrić Grad: the broken bridge of the Balkans
Why Bosnia is spending 12 million euros building a town dreamed up by a novelist.
By Heather McRobie Published 08 March 2012 9:20
It seems almost too neat a symbol of the region's identity crises: one of the Balkans' most famous contemporary cultural figures building a town named after the most famous Balkan writer. But it's not only a symbol, laden as it is with implications. The plans for Andrić Grad are real, located by Visegrad at the mouth of the Drina River, the setting of Ivo Andrić's novel, The Bridge on the Drina. The main financial contributor to the project is film director Emir Kusturica, and it is expected that the project will take four years to complete, costing around 10-12 million Euros. The construction has already been met with resistance from victims of the wartime atrocities in Visegrad, and reignited Bosnia's divisions.
The legacy of Ivo Andrić fragmented in the fifty years since he won the Nobel Prize during what was then Yugoslavia. Andrić lived, at different times, in Belgrade, Sarajevo, and Zagreb, and is often taken to embody the Rubik's cube of Yugoslavian identity: a Croat Catholic by birth, he favoured the (Serbian) Cyrillic script in his writing. While his historical novels are generally seen as embodying a Yugoslavian mosaic, after the breakup of Yugoslavia the successor states "inherited" his legacy in different ways, with Serbia most enthusiastically embracing Andrić as "theirs".
Some have since argued that his novels' portrayal of Bosnian Muslims contributed to the development of Serbian ultra-nationalism, while his juxtaposition of the Habsburg Empire as a more "civilised" occupier than the Ottomans denigrated the Balkans' Muslim heritage.
Then there is the symbol of the bridge, which, between Mostar and The Bridge on the Drina, has become the dominating regional metaphor. Marina Antić has written on how the elevation of Andrić as the most celebrated Balkan writer is part of a quasi-colonial western European viewing of the region: that the book itself acts, for west Europeans, as a "bridge" linking "us" and "them"; the Balkans lazily positioned as "bridge" between east and west. All of this echoes through in the construction of Andrić Grad.
Perhaps the most curious part of the project is who's behind it: Kusturica, the film director who's been hailed everything from hero to traitor and Milošević sympathiser. The trajectory of Kusturica's identity is well-documented, and a mirror to Andrić's - after his childhood with secular Muslim parents in Bosnia, with the breakup of Yugoslavia Kusturica claimed a kind of "Yugoslav without Yugoslavia" identity that, by the end of the conflict, some read as an apology for Serbian nationalism. Underscoring what many saw as his gradual retreat from reality, after the war Kusturica moved into his specially-constructed "ethno-village" Drvengrad, built as a set for his film Life Is A Miracle, with streets named after his icons: Maradona, Che Guevara, Ivo Andrić.
Kusturica is funding the construction of Andrić Grad in collaboration with Milorad Dodik, the President of Republika Sprska, and this alliance is perhaps most disconcerting - the alignment of Kusturica's vision with Dodik, the man who denies Srebrenica was a genocide, amongst his other nationalist statements. This fuels fears by Bosniaks in Visegrad that Andrić Grad is part of a Serbian nationalist plan to "finish off what they didn't complete during the war". What at first sounded like a quaint architectural reconstruction of a novel potentially becomes stitched to the concept of cultural cleansing.
Andrić's tangled history, Kusturica's fraught political position, and the violent history of Visegrad layer over one another in the construction of Andric Grad. But the flipside of ethno-politics is always economics, and the question remains: in what world would someone spend 12 million euros building a town dreamt up by a novelist?
Follow Heather McRobie on Twitter @heathermcrobie
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















9 comments
Agreed and well said
Those who are interested can take a look at what was happening on that bridge during the 1992-1995 war in Bosnia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vi%C5%A1egrad_massacres#Bridge_murders
The contrast between the bridge at Višegrad and the town could not be more stark: the bridge is one of the most magnificent sights in Bosnia and the town has no soul. If you speak to people who lived there, still regard it as their home town and yet cannot face visiting it, you will know why the town has such a feeling of nothingness. Andrić Grad is not going to fill the vacuum. If the intention is to bring visitors to the town, one wonders what a piece of artificial nonsense can do that the bridge cannot. It says a great deal about the Yugoslav Andrić that everyone feels he is theirs. Novels exist in the mind. The only tangible thing about 'Bridge on the Drina' is the bridge. It says a great deal about film makers that their thoughts and visions are the only reality.
@Mattias- you should ask the same question yourself before you make false claims- there was never 50% Bos Serb mix in Sarajevo, in fact the population largely reflected the general demographics throughout BiH although a slightly higher mix of Bos Moslems ( 1991 census: 49.2% Bosniaks, 29.8% Bos Serbs, 6.7% Bos Croats and a mix of others for the rest ( including 10.2% Yugoslavs which is a mix of all of the above)after the war 2002 the figures show an imbalance in the figures with 79.6% Bosniaks, 11.2% Bos Serbs, the reasons for this are complex involving the Bos Serb exodus during the 44 month Serb siege, then the post Dayton exodus when municipal boundaries were redrawn and in protest the then leadership of the RS [Republika Srpska] called on the local Serb population to leave Sarajevo and even take the graves of their loved ones with them. In fact, such a large majority followed the instructions that parts of the city of Sarajevo remained deserted for months.
Given the rhetoric coming from RS over the last 20 years and their track record of destruction in the city during the siege it is not surprising that they feel apprehensive of their place in the city. But no one has denied them their right as a citizen of BiH to return or relocate except for their own prejudice and ambiguous loyalty to a united BiH. The same cannot be said for the Bosniak returnees to RS where the record is one of initially violence then intimidation now isolation. ( question the mix of communities of any town/city along the Drina there your figures in reverse are more accurate)
Finally the Research and Documentation Centre's Report shows the single largest killer of Serb civilians during the war was the Serb siege of Sarajevo.
@Mattias: No, Bosnjaks wouldn't tell you the truth, because they would do anything and everything to portray themselves as the only victims of the war. The fact is that Sarajevo was the second largest city within former Yugoslavia where the Serbs lived in the largest number. Over 8,000 thousands of Serbs who were loyal to Bosnian Government and stayed in Sarajevo were killed by Bosnjaks and their paramilitary forces. Many of them (the exact number has never been disclosed)disappeared without a trace, and this is a well-protected secret in Sarajevo. "Injustice never rules forever!" If you may want to see what was happening during the war in Sarajevo, you may refer to the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mg4T6asFXfU&feature=watch_response_rev
@Drakula There is no film being made here, its not Kusturicas core business for a while already
If you travel to Sarajevo ask where the people who lived there went? Or if you travel to Mostar please ask the same question. 50% of Sarajevo's population was Serb and 20% of Mostar's population was Serb. Today there are no Serbs living in these cities.
Why?
Ask the muslim side.
Visegrad like many such places along the Drina is a monument to suffering and horror. If you visit there ask where are the people who used to live there; the missing neighbours, the Bosniaks. Place a flower on the bridge. Throw another into the Drina. Place a flower at the doorway to the Vilina Vlas resort. Go prepared, take enough provisions so that you don't have to spend your money there.
The bridge is positioned in such a way that nearly all the inhabitants can see it from their windows, such was its importance to the town. The bridge over the Drina was transformed into an execution site- in full view by all. But even if one couldn’t see it they knew what happened- not once have they condemned the events not one memorial for the lives lost, not once an apology. They are now attempting to promote tourism there. Shame is all that hangs upon their projects.
Respect the dead, condemn such projects as they're motivated by the attempt to resurrect some moral credibility to those who committed the crimes or in their silence were complicit in the execution of the crimes. Egoist's as Kusterica and his band of revisionists are like the dam operator downstream who complained about the bodies clogging up the vents, God forbid that their industry suffered.
If this film is financed by Serbian nationalists(and it looks like it is) then I hope the international film community (Cannes, Bollywood BAFTA? Oscar's etc.) boycott the film.