Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

Cultural Capital

Reflections on books and the arts from the New Statesman culture desk

Syndicate contentRSS

Gilbey on Film: Is Joaquin Phoenix having a laugh?

Whether or not his new film is a spoof, the actor is still a welcome antidote to Hollywood.

No one in this super-sophisticated age wants to be the worrywart who goes diving under the bed when Orson Welles's War of the Worlds broadcast comes on the radio. We don't want to be caught out like the celebrities and politicians hoodwinked by Chris Morris's Brass Eye stunts, or the gullible fall guys set up by Sacha Baron Cohen in Borat and Brüno. We like to think we're ahead of every game. We know Elvis is alive. He's gone punting on the Cam with Michael Jackson. There's no pulling the wool over our eyes.

This collective determination to keep the egg as far from our faces as possible stems from the same recognisable social horror, the same morbid fear of the faux pas, that you'd find in something by Mike Leigh or Alan Bennett. And it is present in the response to the upcoming documentary I'm Still Here: the Lost Year of Joaquin Phoenix, which details the public and private meltdown of this brooding actor, who announced last year that he was cutting short his acting career to become a rapper. (To clarify: Phoenix is 35 years old. More to the point, he can't rap.)

A now-infamous appearance on Late Night With David Letterman, in which a taciturn Phoenix sat barricaded behind shades and crazy beard, felt like a bristly protest against the chat-show format, with its insatiable appetite for compliance, charisma and painstakingly rehearsed "off-the-cuff" anecdotes. That the whole affair might have been a prank (Phoenix was enjoying himself too much to suppress the odd indulgent smile or smirk) did not lessen the pleasure, or the spectacle. What was curious was the rush among the media, and online readers, to be the first to spot the joins, to cry foul.

Then the news broke that another actor, Casey Affleck, was following Phoenix everywhere with a camera, documenting this new career. Which brings us up to date. The LA Times reported on a recent screening of I'm Still Here for potential distributors: "It's far from the Joaquin Phoenix you're used to seeing onscreen: snorting cocaine, ordering call girls, having oral sex with a publicist, treating his assistants abusively and rapping badly. And not, apparently, playing a role -- or was he?"

Affleck has denied that the film is a mockumentary. Either way, I hope it isn't overshadowed by all this squabbling about definitions. It's largely irrelevant whether it is a hoax or not. Isn't it illuminating enough that Phoenix should choose to derail his prestigious career, even temporarily, with such tomfoolery? A genuine breakdown could hardly be any more revealing (and, we can but hope, would not have become a YouTube sensation).

Subject and director make an intriguing partnership. Affleck is married to Phoenix's sister. The actors appeared together as a pair of aimless delinquents in Gus van Sant's 1995 black comedy To Die For. Both men began their careers in the shadow of famous elder brothers -- River Phoenix (who died in 1993) and Ben Affleck -- whose work they have now arguably eclipsed. Aspersions have been cast on Casey Affleck's role as the director of I'm Still Here, but he has technical know-how, having helped to edit van Sant's Finding Forrester. "It's one of the best jobs on a movie," he said in 2003. "You get to assemble the thing. That's film -- juxtaposing images. When do you cut? What does it say if you cut there, or here?"

In his most complex on-screen work -- in The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, Gone Baby Gone and The Killer Inside Me (out in the UK next month) -- Affleck is a picture of wiry control. Phoenix, on the other hand, is a splurger, an actor so open, his work can be uncomfortable viewing.

James Gray, who directed him in three films (The Yards, We Own the Night and Two Lovers) wrote: "Looking back on our first collaboration, I'm not sure we actually collaborated all that much. I seem to remember a whole lot of torment and angst and yelling and screaming. But I also remember consistently being amazed by the emotional depth of the then 24- year-old, and I loved his feral unpredictability. He seemed ready to explode at any minute."

Even as a child performer (when he went by the name of Leaf Phoenix), he always seemed uniquely troubled. In the sickly 1989 comedy Parenthood, Phoenix's turn as a hostile, scrunch-faced kid racked with self-loathing supplied a sour antidote to all the hugs and life lessons. He still serves the same function in US cinema. He's still an antidote.

Ryan Gilbey is the New Statesman's film critic. He blogs on film for Cultural Capital every Tuesday

Special offer: get 12 issues of the New Statesman for just £5.99 plus a free copy of "Liberty in the Age of Terror" by A C Grayling.

Tags: Gilbey on Film  Joaquin Phoenix  hollywood  film

2 comments

Chris's picture

Maybe he can't rap (which isn't a problem, because rap is crap!) but he was pretty good as Johnny Cash, in my opinion.

BLEPENSUPPY's picture

Web Hosting Murah Indonesia
Ada banyak hal yang perlu diperhatikan dalam memulai bisnis online. Sebelum Anda dapat mengharapkan pengembalian investasi yang sah, pertama Anda harus memiliki sebuah penelitian yang banyak mengenai bagaimana Anda dapat menempatkan bisnis online Anda ke atas. Selalu memastikan bahwa situs web Anda menyediakan antarmuka user friendly.

Ini berarti link yang terlihat dan mudah untuk mencari. Konten pada situs web Anda harus diberi label dengan benar, foto-foto yang menarik dan tentu saja, juga penting untuk mengatakan sesuatu di halaman rumah Anda dan bahwa, pengenalan artikel harus tata bahasa yang benar dan akan menangkap seorang pembaca.

Memiliki web hosting murah cepat juga penting untuk memiliki pencari optimasi. Sebuah web hosting murah cepat adalah penting untuk website yang baru saja dibuka, terutama jika Anda melakukan SEO. Hal ini akan meminta Anda untuk menggunakan berbagai strategi. optimisasi mesin pencari kebutuhan server yang cepat dan handal.

Anda dapat memilih untuk membeli hosting murah, hosting murah pada dasarnya web tidak berarti pelayanan lebih lambat, dan itu tergantung pada bagaimana Anda mengoptimalkan penggunaan. Tidak peduli seberapa indah terlihat website Anda dan Anda telah melakukan banyak SEO sehari-hari, jika anda tidak terjawab dalam memilih hak hosting, tidak akan ada bedanya.

Anda hosting hanya mungkin mencegah Anda dari pandangan Anda upload. Ada dua hal di mana Anda dapat memperoleh sebuah host, salah satunya adalah meminta mereka bebas dan berikutnya adalah untuk membayarnya. Mendapatkan mereka untuk pengoptimalan gratis tidak akan memuaskan pencarian karena akses terbatas. Layanan hosting berbayar akan melakukan banyak hal di bisnis web Anda, tetapi ada cara untuk menempatkan dua bersama-sama dengan memilih untuk web hosting murah cepat.

Tentu saja akan selalu bermanfaat untuk mendapatkan host gratis, tapi Anda harus mengerti bahwa Anda berurusan dengan mesin pencari optimasi. Sebuah web hosting murah cepat rencana sebagus gratis, jika Anda berpikir dari sekian banyak manfaat yang dapat Anda kumpulkan.

Jelas, Anda tidak akan mempromosikan akses bandwidth yang terbatas; itu adalah alasan mengapa Anda harus mendapatkan layanan hosting berbayar di situs web Anda, ada banyak hosting murah, namun menyediakan layanan yang cepat. Sebuah web hosting murah cepat karena dapat membuat sebuah website yang tepat untuk apa yang Anda memperkirakan itu. Gratis dan web hosting murah cepat tidak menyediakan trouble shooting. Saya sarankan Anda memilih untuk dibayar bahkan mereka web hosting murah hosting, karena mereka juga dapat menyediakan perangkat lunak menembak masalah.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets