Return to: Home | Blogs | Cultural Capital

LFF #9 -- A Serious Man

From the London Film Festival: the Coen brothers are back

A Serious Man
dirs: Joel and Ethan Coen

"Just accept the mystery," is the advice of one character in the Coens' new film, and viewers should probably take heed. Lawrence Gopnik is a buttoned-up Jewish university lecturer in 1960s America and the Coens make lots of horrible things happen to him. He doesn't understand why, we don't understand why, and the various rabbis he visits can't explain why. Perhaps in response to the perceived glibness of their last film, Burn After Reading (I quite liked it, but plenty of others didn't), the Coens have gone for a portentous mix of religion, death and sexual frustration.

In their less flippant moments, the Coens show an interest in the way language can be twisted and used to dominate others: it's not a million miles away, in fact, from Harold Pinter. There's a scene here, in which Gopnik is verbally trampled on by a love rival, that really reminds me of The Birthday Party. The Coens may drape their ideas in pop-cultural references and knowing stereotypes (neurotic American Jews, in this case), but often something sinister and suffocating lies beneath.

When they're good, you sense an underlying thesis, however abstract it might be. (The Big Lebowski, for example, contained a loose allegory of the first Gulf war.) When they're not so good, the films carry the air of a set piece, a somewhat detached exercise in style. (Burn After Reading was a case in point, indicated by the neat but throwaway visual sequences that topped and tailed the film.)

A Serious Man sits somewhere between those two points. It does, however, contain at least one great joke. At the front of a crowded synagogue, one of the attendants lets slip an expletive as he lifts an unexpectedly heavy set of Torah scrolls: "Jesus Christ!"

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

Michael Saint
28 October 2009 at 16:33

A review so fatuous that it is worthy of the New Statesman.

For a real review I suggest readers try:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000%5C...

Daniel Trilling
28 October 2009 at 16:57

Glad you like it, Michael. Trolling a website you don't rate is of course a completely non-fatuous use of your time.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

A rouger shade of Palin

20 November 2009 11:35

The responsibilities of the intellectual

18 November 2009 15:39

Native spirit

18 November 2009 11:30

The man who knew too much

17 November 2009 16:51

Jailhouse rock

17 November 2009 15:56

Would Socrates have got research funding?

16 November 2009 11:46

The impact of "impact"

16 November 2009 09:44

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker