Return to: Home | Blogs | Cultural Capital

Street of shame

BBC drama not all that it's cracked up to be

Looking for something to watch this evening? Log on to BBC iplayer and catch up with the latest series of Jimmy McGovern's The Street. Fantastic writing and acting - even from the usually irritating Anna Friel. Unfortunately, the current issue of Private Eye explains why you'll be lucky to see the likes of it again any time soon:

Although transmitted by the BBC, which has a pretty secure income, The Street was produced, under a pretty standard post-deregulation arrangement, by ITV. It's true that 20 years ago The Street would simply have been on ITV, but you can't have everything and this seemed the best of both worlds, combining the production skills of ITV with the scheduling possibilities of BBC1. Until - to save money - ITV pretty much closed down its drama unit, except for Coronation Street. ITV insists McGovern could have continued with a lower-budget version . . . but . . . he decided not to collaborate in vandalism.

The decimation of quality ITV drama - popular but not populist, made with a respect for people from different regions and social classes - is not one one of the most headline-grabbing effects of Thatcherism, but it is one of the most pernicious. And one, typically, that has accelerated under 12 years of a New Labour government.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

1 comment from readers

jason from weymouth
26 July 2009 at 13:37

The Street is a saving grace in our television scheduling and the BBC must be congratulated on being prepared to offer the viewer something that is both socially realistic and cerebral. All this and a 21.00 slot on '1'. Too many programmes are dumming down audience expectations and the adoption of a tabloid mentality is unacceptable, verging upon the tragic. ITV once had John Pilger, occasionally at 22.30, which at least reflected symbolically upon their programming, now I cannot remember the last time I even looked. We should have the quality of 'Year Zero'... every week across our prime time programming by production teams that are challenged to take risks with their ideas, locations, interview styles... . A democratic state demands it at the very least.

The notion of choice, especially in the programming on offer, is depending upon your philosophical standpoint, either neo-marxist hegemony or post - modern illusion. Choice must mean variety, enabling all ideas a platform to be presented and analysed. From Pyongyang to 310 First Street, Washington DC and from Combat 18 to the Socialist Workers Party everything must be out there and not hidden away to be digested clandestinely.

The BBC is the only broadcater that is not held to ransom by advertisers and this must be protected. Panorama at 21.30, once a week, might be tokenism but at least it exists. It should be a platform for bigger and better types of programme though, of which The Street is one. Too much is hidden away on BBC 4 where only certain audiences venture. BBC 3 has avoided the threat of being shut down, which is to be applauded,but at what cost. However, ITV 2 to 4 rarely has anything that even awakens the imagination let alone stretches it. What it must do is offer something different to Sky or it will be at risk of becoming irrelevant. Sky is a corporation that is run by 'sharks'. Profit and monopoly are their main considerations. The BBC and ITV need a new agenda. Their survival depends upon it.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

Books of the year

26 November 2009 10:19

Breaking news!

25 November 2009 17:43

A (gay) kiss is just a kiss

25 November 2009 16:59

Everyone's gone green

24 November 2009 11:34

Frank Auerbach and the tormented surfaces of post-war London

24 November 2009 00:00

Artist anonymous

23 November 2009 15:49

A rouger shade of Palin

20 November 2009 11:35

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will the next election produce a hung parliament?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker