Boris fires a warning shot at Cameron over police cuts

Cameron looked uneasy as Boris vowed not to let police numbers fall below a "safe" level.

Boris Johnson's speech to the Conservative conference wasn't one of his most memorable. The hall was half empty (security arrangements delayed many) and there were fewer jokes than usual. But the London Mayor fired a notable warning shot at David Cameron over police cuts. He vowed that he would "not allow police numbers to fall below a number that I believe is safe and reasonable". As Boris made his pledge, the camera cut to Cameron, who looked distinctly uneasy, unable to join in with the applause from the floor.

But with this exception, the Mayor kept his powder dry. He did not repeat his attack on the 50p tax rate (one of his favourite dividing lines with Cameron), merely stressing the need for the "right tax and regulatory framework." He knowingly added, "I will say no more than that". Elsewhere, he praised the "much-maligned banks" for helping to support apprenticeship schemes in London but went no further in his defence of the "leper colony".

Yet even with fewer rhetorical pyrotechnics, Boris still charmed the hall. He repeated his amusing quip about calling a "snap Olympics" to "catch the world napping". He vowed to "recapture" the 18 Boris bikes that had gone missing. And, borrowing a Gandhian trope, he repeatedly promised to "put the village back in the city", a sentiment that seemed to resonate with the delegates. By the end, Cameron could not help looking slightly envious.

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.

YouTube screengrab
Show Hide image

Listen: Schools Minister Nick Gibb gets SATs question for 11-year-olds wrong

Exams put too much pressure on children. And on the politicians who insist they don't put too much pressure on children.

As we know from today's news of a primary school exams boycott, or "kids' strike", it's tough being a schoolchild in Britain today. But apparently it's also tough being a Schools Minister.

Nick Gibb, Minister of State at the Department for Education, failed a SATs grammar question for 11-year-olds on the BBC's World at One today. Having spent all morning defending the primary school exams system - criticised by tens of thousands of parents for putting too much pressure on young children - he fell victim to the very test that has come under fire.

Listen here:

Martha Kearney: Let me give you this sentence, “I went to the cinema after I’d eaten my dinner”. Is the word "after" there being used as a subordinating conjunction or as a preposition?

Nick Gibb: Well, it’s a proposition. “After” - it's...

MK: [Laughing]: I don’t think it is...

NG: “After” is a preposition, it can be used in some contexts as a, as a, word that coordinates a subclause, but this isn’t about me, Martha...

MK: No, I think, in this sentence it’s being used a subordinating conjunction!

NG: Fine. This isn’t about me. This is about ensuring that future generations of children, unlike me, incidentally, who was not taught grammar at primary school...

MK: Perhaps not!

NG: ...we need to make sure that future generations are taught grammar properly.

I'm a mole, innit.