The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Clegg takes on the establishment

The Lib Dem leader's "in power but anti-establishment" messsage is a promising one.

When the introduction to a politician's speech starts with a black and white photo of them looking serious, you know there's a sombre message coming.

So it was with Nick Clegg's speech ending the Liberal Democrat autumn conference, as he talked of the state of the UK and world economies, about how the party was "not doing the easy thing, but doing the right thing. Not easy, but right". He was frank about the challenges of being in government: "Liberal Democrats, we have now been in Government for 500 days. Not easy, is it? None of us thought it would be a walk in the park, but I suspect none of us predicted just how tough it would turn out to be. We've lost support, we've lost councillors, and we lost a referendum. I know how painful it has been to face anger and frustration on the doorstep."

But much of the speech was about a positive message for what the Liberal Democrats are achieving in office, taking on vested interests: "We speak up, first and loudest, when the establishment lets the people down. In the last three years, we've seen establishment institutions exposed one by one. The City of London, shattered by the greed of bankers. The media, corrupted by phone hacking. Parliament, shamed by expenses."

It was a good message, well received in the conference hall with close interest in the sombre patches and heavy applause at other times.

The anti-establishment lines got the heaviest applause. But the themes of Clegg's speech were not ones consistently portrayed throughout the rest of party conference. Indeed, the conference slogan itself ("In government, on your side") was far more notable by its absence from most of the other
conference key note speeches and in itself is not really an anti-establishment.

So if the "in power but anti-establishment" message is to get over to the wider public, who pay only passing attention to political news most weeks, a lot more work remains to be done.

Mark Pack is co-editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and in his third decade of conference-attending.

10 comments

Mike S's picture

He's doing the 'right' thing, for sure.

He makes Margaret Thatcher look like a .........err, Liberal

swatantra's picture

He is the Establishment, public school and silver spoon in mouth and job and seat through old boys network, and everything. And thatoes for majority of Lib Dem MPs. Do an analysis and see for yourself.

David Wearing1's picture

A millionaire forcing the poorest to pay the most and the richest to pay almost nothing for a crisis created by the financial industry......is anti-establishment?!

"Taking on vested interests"? No-one has better served the biggest vested interests of the lot - the banks - than this coalition. P1ss-weak reforms that won't come in til 12 years after Northern Rock went bust, and the rest of us lose earnings, jobs, pensions, businesses, standards of living, essential services to pay for their crisis.

We could all have a good laugh at the Liberals' capacity for self-serving delusion, if it wasn't sustaining their vicious assault on ordinary people up and down this country.

Freeman2's picture

The man is a creep. Crawling your way into government isn't 'anti-establishment'. The government is always part of the establishment. The idiots in the Lib Dems can delude themselves but they're finished in the 'we're different from the others' game.

matthew fox's picture

I thought Olly was out of touch, but Mark trumps her.

How can you be " Anti-Establishment ", when your dad was head of a bank and you get a former foreign secretary use his influence to bag a EU job?

David Lindsay's picture

"In no one's pocket"? Pull the other one, Nick.

All parties have "paymasters". The difference is that before and after New Labour, everyone knew who Labour's were and everyone knows who Labour's are. Mass membership organisations of ordinary people who all contribute small sums voluntarily, to be precise. And yes, of course all parties' financial backers give money in return for policies of which they approve. Why else would they give it? And what's wrong with that?

Oh, and another thing. If "these are British rights drafted by British lawyers", then why do we need a European Court to enforce them? All such rulings should be made subject to ratification by a resolution of the House of Commons, the High Court of Parliament, itself elected by a means more reflective of public opinion and with the public given the determinative say in selecting party candidates as well as in choosing between them and others.

Hugh Markey's picture

The media were hoping for a lynch mob and instead they got a Barnum and Baily seance.
In psychology the Barnum effect is well known. Barnum's opinion now somewhat of an axiom is that 'there's one born every minute!"
And they all turn up at the LibDem Conference.
Amazing coincidence!

Crystal Balls Gazers

Mizar's picture

There has to be a political price paid for the dishonesty of Clegg. That will inevitably happen. But because he IS so part of the establishment, his loss of power, a seat, or whatever, will make little difference. He will pick up directorships, or some quango, or retire on his personal wealth, and write a tedious book.

Ray North's picture

This was a terrible speech - it was confused on economics, vacuous on principle and petty in the way in which he blamed Labour. It shows just what a terrible place the Lib-Dem are in at the moment. And I speak as someone who worked and stood for the party.
Follow the link for a more detailed analysis of the speech:
http://www.allthatsleft.co.uk/2011/09/nick-clegg-speech-confusing-depres...

tamster's picture

Clegg's speech promising ?

Only if you're a member of the Cult of Lib Dems.

Thank god only 9% seem to be part of that wierd cult according to the YouGov daily poll today.

No conference poll bounce...surprise, surprise

Latest tweets