Return to: Home | Blogs | Conference blog

Blears joins the Tories

Surprise in Birmingham as government minister Hazel Blears turns up at the Tory conference only to sense a whiff of hubris. Well more than a whiff...

I turned a few heads this week by appearing at a fringe meeting at the Conservative Party conference in Birmingham. Several Tory ‘representatives’ did double takes. Some were mildly rude; some were perfectly friendly. There were also plenty of Labour people who stopped to say hello, including, improbably, Sunder Katwala from the Fabian Society who looked like a fish out of water.

I had two distinct impressions of seeing the Tories up close. The first was that they were bursting with excitement at the prospect of getting back into Government. They’ve been told to hold the champagne, and tone down the triumphalism. But they can’t quite help themselves. Hubris hung in the air like incense. And as a Labour candidate in 1992 who lost by 500 votes, I know all about hubris. They seem convinced that they are on the way to Downing Street, but I am not so sure their confidence is shared by the electorate, especially in the current economic turbulence.

The second impression was that the Conservatives remain unreconstructed. Once you get past Cameron, Osborne, Gove, Lansley and few others, you can see the Hiltonisation of the party is skin-deep. The same nasty party lurks underneath, with its 80s attitudes, instincts and fashion sense. This is the Tories’ fatal misreading of New Labour. It was never a make-over job. It was a pretty tough and fundamental repositioning of policy, based on a rediscovery of our core values, and a reconnection to the ambitions of the majority of voters. If it was just about slick campaigning, Labour would have won in 1987, never mind 1992. Yet the Tories think it’s about backdrops, logos and taking your tie off. They think they can win with superficial spin, rather than substantive change.

In the fringe meeting, on ‘mending broken Britain’ the biggest support was for tearing up the Human Rights Act and for harsher prison regimes. If a vote was taken, I would have guessed that a sizeable chunk would have been in favour of hanging, or at the very least flogging. The guts of my remarks to the meeting was that we need fast, effective justice, with penalties that serve as both punishment and deterrent. We need better support for victims and witnesses. But we also need to tackle the social conditions and factors which create anti-social behaviour and crime. You can’t absolve people from the responsibility for their actions; everyone has a choice. But you can’t pretend that people’s circumstances don’t play a role.

The Tory grassroots instinctively want tougher penalties (although their MPs don’t vote for tough measures in the Commons). But they have nothing to say about early intervention into problem families, tackling gang culture, building more youth centres, doing more to support boxing, cadets and other distractions for urban young people, or creating more opportunities for volunteering. Indeed, if Osborne ever gets the chance for a first budget, the Tory cuts would fall hardest on the very programmes and schemes which help young people realise a better future for themselves. You don’t need a masters in sociology to understand that Tory cuts would lead to social chaos, just like last time.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

7 comments from readers

Nilsey105
01 October 2008 at 21:11

Hello Rufus

The tories will always be nasty,brutish and short, Its in their DNA.

What matters is not the overt statements of policy but rather the hidden agenda they always have.

Thatchers determination to crush the trades union movement was always a covert operation untill it all exploded by taking on the miners.

What they do have as policy is a constructive argument for REAL apprenticeships.

This is what the young are desperate for not some meaningless SCHEME. The YOPS programme of the 80s offered very little as the present schemes do.

Tories even go so far as to offer a university place once time served.

I havnt seen what they are planning but a return to "sandwich courses" wouldnt be a bad idea.

If London is short of a 1000 plumbers and electricians then what better way to get the kids off the streets and into a real meaningful job .

antileft
02 October 2008 at 04:51

"They seem convinced that they are on the way to Downing Street, but I am not so sure their confidence is shared by the electorate, especially in the current economic turbulence."

Ahem. Have you not seen the polls? You might want to take a look- if the electorate are as confident as the polls suggest, you might need a new job. You should start looking now- after 3 terms of labour there arent many jobs left...

Jonny Mac
02 October 2008 at 09:23

The lovely, diminuitive Hazel is following an obvious, if grotesquely cynical strategy: (a) her government so mismanages the economy and so overspends that, as Osbourne says, 'the cupboard is bare' (b) she then starts attacking the Tories for the 'cuts' that will have to be made because of this Labour incompetence - before they're even in power! Scorched earth politics with a nasty Nu-Lab spintwist.

HB knows the next election is lost. She's positioning herself to lead Labour in opposition by promoting herself as a chirpy, centrist attack chipmunk.

http://www.jonnymacsplace.blogspot.com/

antileft
02 October 2008 at 09:49

"She's positioning herself to lead Labour in opposition by promoting herself as a chirpy, centrist attack chipmunk."

Heh heh if labour ends up with someone as populist, idiotic and useless as HB in charge then theyre doomed. HB for labour leader!

Jonny Mac
02 October 2008 at 10:06

Nilsey - "Thatchers determination to crush the trades union movement was always a covert operation untill it all exploded by taking on the miners."

What are you on about? "Covert operation?" Her desire to weaken the unions was set out in the 1979 manifesto, and then in legislation! It was hardly a 'hidden agenda', it was a key part of her appeal to the electorate!

Nilsey105
02 October 2008 at 14:04

Jonny Mac

02 October 2008 at 10:06

"What are you on about? "Covert operation?" Her desire to weaken the unions was set out in the 1979 manifesto, and then in legislation! It was hardly a 'hidden agenda', it was a key part of her appeal to the electorate!"

I stand corrected. HOWEVER.

I see no mention of her use of state violence to make her case.

As i have said elsewhere 1929 gunboats up the Mersey.

State control by force equates to facism.

gnuneo
11 October 2008 at 14:59

can be summarised as "yes we're bad, but they're worse."

unfortunately its true.

the British Public deserve better choices.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

Sombre Tories

01 October 2008 09:10

Tackling homelessness

29 September 2008 18:34

Yet to seal the deal

27 September 2008 09:27

Brown's comeback

23 September 2008 18:21

The need for 'narrative'

23 September 2008 15:43

Time to rein in the wreckless

22 September 2008 20:04

A bold vision?

22 September 2008 13:17

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Blogroll

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker