Return to: Home | Blogs | Conference blog

Time to rein in the wreckless

Former Labour minister turned thinktank chief Chris Leslie gives his reaction to Alistair Darling's conference speech in Manchester

Alistair's speech to conference today may not be the talk of the bar at the Midland Hotel - most delegates wanted far more radicalism - but there's no doubt that it was the most significant contribution to the actual debates so far.

He didn't detail a raft of policy specifics, nor did he commit to new spending plans. But the Chancellor did signal that the normal market orthodoxies which have let rip in the city are at last facing the prospect of restraint and accountability.

This is seismic stuff and Labour's leadership would do well to capture the imagination of the vast majority of the British public by acting decisively to curb excessive speculation and the perverse bonus culture that has fuelled the recent financial turmoil.

It's not only morally right that Labour reins in those wrecklessly gambling with the livelihoods of others, it is essential if we are to rebuild an efficient and successful economy.

Short-selling stocks and talking down the prospects of companies can become a cancer that deters long term investment and destabilises rationale investment choices.

We are witnessing the dawning realisation that markets have their limits, that at the edges of economics there are vital political interests, and that those advocating sturdy regulation and transparency have been right all along.

Britain now has an opportunity to lead the world in the design of a fairer and more open system of international checks and balances. And Labour should highlight the reliance of the Tories on the old laissez faire paradigms now wholly defunct.

Gordon will need to maintain early momentum and strike while the iron is hot. In the new circumstances we find ourselves in there is a real chance to put Cameron on the back foot, especially if hypothecating some tax revenues from the very richest and giving a tax break to the vast majority.

The Tories like to talk about "sharing the proceeds of growth". Those whose wealth has ballooned unfairly during the boom times should be asked to share some of the proceeds of their privileged growth with ordinary working people.

The Tories cannot afford to oppose any reasonable moves to tax and regulate the super-rich. There is a new licence to act boldly in the air and Labour must capitalise on that new mood.

Hinting at changes and chiming with some of the instincts of Labour's delegates is sufficient for this week, but the real test will be on policy activism in Alistair's pre budget report.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

gnuneo
25 September 2008 at 16:06

tinkering with the system, the limit of new-Labour's 'progressiveness', is entirely too limited to deal with the scale of the problems the UK is now facing. Taxing the super-rich is all very well, but without strong proposals to create, boost and enlarge local companies locally owned, the underlying trends will remain in the direction of wealth drifting upwards and out of the UK economy.

the Tories are entirely incapable of delivering such a move (it flies in the face of their class beliefs, that a minority are 'born to rule'), and frankly it seems quite unlikely that new-Labour could move there also, i guess it will depend upon how much they wish to actually stay in power.

physiocrat
27 September 2008 at 00:05

The problems you are talking about are symptoms of a deeper problem. They are a consequence of the tax system. Labour needs to have a look at one of its old policies - Land Value Taxation. In 1938, the LCC under Herbert Morrison introduced a Bill which with little change would be an ideal model for what is needed. It is, incidentally, which would be of as much benefit to business as to workers.

Go to the following site

http://www.landvaluetax.org/document-archive/view-category.h...

and download the London Rating (Site Values) Bill 1939. This was drafted by Parliamentary Solicitors Dyson Bell and with little change is probably still fully functional and could operate nationally. Chris, please go and look at it and then have a look at the material on the rest of the site to understand the rationale behind the proposal. If implemented as quickly as practicable, eg through parliament as an urgent matter within the timetable and commencing the valuation as soon as the Royal Assent was granted, without delay, Britain will suffer only a short recession and bounce back out of it with renewed vigour. If rates of LVT are ramped up quicky as a replacement for existing taxes, Britain will also immunise itself against the Great Crash of 2028 or thereabouts, as these things occur at 18 year intervals and the present one still has about 18 months before it bottoms-out.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

Blears joins the Tories

01 October 2008 16:51

Sombre Tories

01 October 2008 09:10

Tackling homelessness

29 September 2008 18:34

Yet to seal the deal

27 September 2008 09:27

Brown's comeback

23 September 2008 18:21

The need for 'narrative'

23 September 2008 15:43

A bold vision?

22 September 2008 13:17

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Blogroll

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker