Registered user login:

Conference blog Homepage

Miliband: We can win the election

  • Posted by David Miliband
  • 22 September 2008

Foreign Secretary David Miliband urges Labour to defend its record, be candid about its strengths and weaknesses and show why David Cameron's plans are the new con. Plus the RSA's Matthew Taylor on trouble in Manchester

Miliband is being touted by some as a possible Labour leader

At the next election, foreign policy can be a winner for Labour. But only if we demonstrate why it is integral to Britain’s security and opportunity, set out a clear vision of British foreign policy that draws on our values, and show why progressive ends cannot be delivered by conservative means.

Foreign policy used to be considered enemy territory for the left. It was the realm where national interest had to take precedence over progressive values.

I think that version of foreign policy is out-dated. The promotion of our values are not a distraction from national interests, but the best way of securing them.

By progressive values, I really mean the two traditions that gave birth to this party: the radical liberal tradition that emphasises individual freedom and democratic rights; and the social democratic emphasis on a more just and equal distribution of resources. Both are critical to furthering our national interests.

Promoting democracy and human rights is the best way of protecting Britain. The main threats to security emanate from countries in weak states, with little rule of law, and no democratic accountability; or authoritarian states where power is unchecked.

Reducing inequalities in income, wealth and power are not only desirable things in their own right, they contribute to a safer world.

The Tories now claim to agree with our goals. But David Cameron says that “progressive ends will best be met through conservative means.” And that is the new con, in Cameron’s conservatives. You cannot deliver progressive ends by Tory isolationism from Europe and Tory anti-statism.

Think of the things we want to achieve in the world, and imagine how you do them without a strong European Union. Democracy has taken root in eastern Europe, in large part, because of the attraction of joining the largest single market in the world. When the EU sets new low-carbon vehicle emission standards, it transforms the global car market. Inequality will only be addressed by the EU playing its part in securing a conclusion to the Doha trade round.

The Tories excessive faith in the power of the nation is ill-suited to an interdependent world. But so too is the Tories excessive scepticism in the power of the state. Climate change will not be addressed without incentives to move from high carbon to low carbon technology. Financial markets need more effective regulation. Poverty will not be tackled without large transfers of income. On their own markets, do not produce the global public goods we need; markets have to be shaped by states.

If the Tories were in power. I fear the Tories would oscillate between hubris and fatalism: between thinking they can achieve more than they can with the means at their disposal; and then retreating to a more conventional foreign policy, preserving narrowly defined national interests, forgetting that poverty and authoritarianism will store up problems that will spill over into our borders.

So my message is simple. We can win the next election because it is our party that has the right values to deliver security and opportunity. We must defend our record, by being candid about its strengths and weaknesses. We must set out a bold vision. And we must show why conservatives means cannot deliver our progressive ends.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

11 comments from readers

Carl Jones
22 September 2008 at 11:52

Censorship is alive and well.LOL

Nilsey105
22 September 2008 at 13:31

Finally someone sets out their interpretation of "progressive". I recall Thatcher being proclaimed "radical". A word at the time associated only with the left.

David you state, "foreign policy can be a winner for Labour". Sorry you need to change your policy. The sabre rattling you exhibited over the Georgia fiasco may have endeard you to the Bush administration but not to the British public.

You want to show a, "clear vision of British foreign policy that draws on our values". Wars in Iraq.Afganistan,Sabre rattling towards Iran, Russia etc are not what we need as examples of British Values in the 21st century .Days of the Empire have gone.

The use of Diego Garcia by the Americans has been abused. The agreement for use needs to be terminated forthwith. We need to show the world we are not war mongers now Blair has gone.

You want to promote democracy and human rights throughout the world and democratic accountability.

Well all those MPs rushing off buying their second home furniture etc certainly werent subject to any accountability were they.

You seek a reduction in the wealth gap. Why has it been allowed over the past 10 years to widen.

Why has there been no effectual regulation of the financial sector.

You see a strong EU as beneficial to the UK. Whilst at the same time your party to not giving the people a democratic say in any legislation that has a direct bearing upon the daily lives.

The ordinary working class and middle classes in the east european countries are sufferring huge price hikes in everything that they need to survive. They do not see any benefits economically from EU membership.

Tories are creations of the devil. I want no truck with them or their policys.

But ffs you will get them back in power unless you implement a radical left of center policy instead of the mealy mouthed new labour claptrap we are all sick to the back teeth of.

cat osb
22 September 2008 at 16:13

Foreign policy can be a winner for labour at the next election? Interesting. So, David (if I may), if the US wanted to launch a pre-emptive strike against the Iranians because of growing concerns about that country's ability to build a nuclear bomb, what would your position be? Would you condemn such an attack or support it? And if the latter, what form would that support take?

sara
22 September 2008 at 16:42

there is something abnormal about US policy, presidential candidates, why they should pay their homage to their new God "jewish lobby", how did they got their power? there is something abnormal, why no one dare to talk about Holocaust, of course he'll be anti-Semist, , human history is full of tragedies, why only jewish, eventually we're all in the very boat.

the weird thing about policy, to be a real politician you've to have some characters:

1- cynic, be a snappish dog.

2- be a big liar, deceive others.

3- don't respect people easy to deceive "deception

system".

4- ur personal interest first.

its very advanced civilization, democrasy

mnkors
23 September 2008 at 01:38

Mr. Miliband may be clever but he lacks intellectual gravitas and does not posses inborn decency that helps people to escape being ridiculous.

He reflects the decline of his party.

bent
23 September 2008 at 02:14

And Pigs can fly!

Jonny Mac
23 September 2008 at 09:06

Ah, the modern British left.

A schoolboy tentatively continues his bid to oust his leader; and commenters on his article wallow in anti-Semitism.

Class, pure class.

Jonny Mac
23 September 2008 at 12:44

Carl - your posts are predicated on the basis that Jewish people

(a) are very powerful

(b) operate that power behind the scenes in a shadowy way, and

(c) operate that power in a way that serves the interests of Jews and/or Israel, rather than of eg their country.

That is almost a textbook definition of classic anti-Semitism, and could be taken from the infamous forgery The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. A similar representation appears in Mein Kampf. It means you present Jews as having more power than other people, being unaccountable in the way that power is used, and using that power to promote the interests of their 'race' and against the interests of their class/country.

This presentation is not true. It is likely to create or increase hatred of Jewish people as Jewish people amongst those who read it and believe it. It is therefore racist.

I would like to believe you are not a racist, in that you don't treat Jewish people differently in your everyday life. But you should be aware that for the reasons set out above, much of what you write is racist. It's your right to believe it and write it. But be in no doubt - it is racist, and you risk being considered a racist as a result. Claiming you don't know what anti-Semitism is, chucking in lots of 'lol's and banging on about the NWO doesn't get you off that hook.

Carl Jones
24 September 2008 at 10:23

Jonny, I did reply, but Ben decided to censor me....however, if you wish to take legal action against me, I`m sure you can get the court to hand over my censored comments.LOL

Jonny Mac
24 September 2008 at 10:34

Carl - thanks, I saw your reply before it was zapped.

Please rest assured that I have no intention to take legal action against you! On the contrary, I'm all for freedom of expression and am firmly in the 'don't like what you say, defend your right to say it' camp.

JM

gnuneo
25 September 2008 at 20:08

censorship is indeed alive and well - i note my own comment disappeared! How exactly could it have been "anti-semitic", when in it i pointed out approvingly many Jewish groups are also opposed to Zionism?

...or was that the part that needed censoring?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

David Miliband

David Miliband is MP for South Shields and foreign secretary

Recent Posts

Blears joins the Tories

  • By Hazel Blears
  • 01 October 2008

Sombre Tories

  • By Grant Shapps
  • 01 October 2008

Tackling homelessness

  • By Grant Shapps
  • 29 September 2008

Yet to seal the deal

  • By Eric Pickles
  • 27 September 2008

Brown's comeback

  • By Jessica Asato
  • 23 September 2008

The need for 'narrative'

  • By Jessica Asato
  • 23 September 2008

Time to rein in the wreckless

  • By Chris Leslie
  • 22 September 2008