Return to: Home | Blogs | Conference blog

We were right to strike

  • Posted by
  • 10 September 2007 11:00

As the TUC gets underway, RMT boss Bob Crow uses a newstatesman.com article to attack critics in the capitalist media who condemned Tube strike action

The capitalist media went apoplectic when 2,300 RMT members at failed privateer Metronet went on strike last week to protect their jobs and pensions.

I am proud of every one of those trade unionists, who held the line with a rock-solid and 100 per cent effective strike, which gave their negotiating team the strength it needed.

I have always believed that you can judge how good a job a union is doing by how nasty the attacks upon it get, so judging by the vitriol spewing from the right-wing media, I reckon we can't have done too badly.

The bankrupt company and its administrator - and, it must be said, Transport for London - seemed to sleepwalk into the dispute, and the blame for the massive disruption to the public belongs fairly and squarely with them.

Maybe they believed their own spin, for despite five weeks' notice of our intention to strike, and the fact that only 20 of our members voted against it, a sense of urgency only appeared on the day the strike started.

Our members demonstrated that their jobs and pensions will not become the price to be paid for the failure of a PFI project that has already seen millions robbed from the Tube network.

We have also delivered the clear message that any other employer who comes after our members' jobs, pensions or conditions can expect more of the same.

This week we will be asking our brothers and sisters at the TUC to throw the weight of the entire trade union movement behind the demand that Tube maintenance is brought back into the public sector.

That is what our members want, for ultimately that is the only way in which their jobs and pensions, but that is also what the vast majority of Londoners want because they know that is the way to protect the public service our members deliver.

We will also be asking delegates this week to campaign for a referendum on the re-hashed European Union Constitution, and to campaign for a 'no' vote, in line with Congress policy adopted two years ago.

Whatever you call the EU Reform Treaty, it contains the same anti-democratic mix that was in the Constitution supposedly killed off by French and Dutch votes in 2005.

It is the back-door Constitution which would still transform the EU into a state, and transfer power to an unelected EU government.

For working people it would be a disaster, further institutionalising the mis-named economic 'liberalisation', forcing more privatisation of public services and abolishing vetoes over transport and a host of other areas.

It would be a breath of fresh air if the government stopped hiding behind EU regulations that, for example, forced the tendering of Caledonian MacBrayne's lifeline ferry services, and started challenging them instead.

The CalMac tendering process cost taxpayers a staggering £17 million - money that should have been spent on improving those services.

Just a fraction of it would settle the Orkney Ferries dispute, where our members are still being paid upwards of £2,000 less than colleagues on other ferry companies.

During our Metronet strike last week there were the usual right-wing voices calling for strikes to be banned in public services - as if the anti-union laws still on the statute book weren't already restrictive enough.

We already have to jump through hoops to take strike action at all, and isn't it outrageous that our brothers and sisters in the Prison Officers' Association should face the prospect of court action for striking at all?

The POA has done the entire movement a favour by thumbing its nose at laws that belong in the history books

And that is why we will also this week be asking Congress to step up campaigning for trade-union rights and for an end to Britain's shameful position outside international Labour Organisation conventions on labour rights.

With the Trade Union Freedom Bill heading for its second reading on October 19, we need to mobilise for the biggest possible turn-out at the parliamentary rally in the House of Commons on October 18.

Trade-union freedom isn't an abstract idea, or a luxury that would be nice to have - it is a basic necessity without which working people will always be fighting with both arms tied behind their backs

Bob Crow is general secretary of the RMT

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

12 comments from readers

IrritatedofTonbridge
10 September 2007 at 15:39

Bob you're tin-pot tyrant who bullies and blackmails to get your members ever more ludicrous deals. Oh and just remind us why you still admire Stalin and Mao?

taghioff.info
10 September 2007 at 15:55

Bob. Well done for standing up for union rights, and good luck at stopping the waves of privatisation that are going on.

Whilst you are right about the European constitution containing privatization clauses (the left are very against it in Sweden because of this) you have to bear in mind that in England, the only bill of rights we currently have has come via Europe.

Remember also that trade unions are much stronger on the continent than they are in the UK, hence the far higher quality of life in real terms. So don't set yourself too strongly against the European project, the alternative is Americanization! (Even the spell checker on this site likes zeds rather than s'es in ise.)

England is too small to stand alone these days.

Pencils
10 September 2007 at 18:42

Well done Bob. Pity the rest of the 'awkward squad' haven't turned out to be very awkward and the TUC keeps acting like a branch of MI5. Keep the gloves off - they should have been off since1985.

taghioff.info - I'm afraid I can't see the EU as an opposite to Americanization. The union rights in European countries are the results of national struggles and policies which the EU is doing all it can to subvert. I see the EU now as a tool of American domination; lobbyists from the US government and the giant corporations seem to have easy and infinite access to the ears of the unelected EU commission which initiates all policy; the Parliament is always under pressure to go along with whatever the commission comes up with; with the entry of the Eastern nations there is now a bloc whose politicians are solidly owned by the 'US' ; is the European Defence Initiative likely to be any real alternative to NATO or is it just a subterfuge to gain control of France's nuclear deterrent.... The questions could go on and on, and that's the point! How many people could you find that could tell you 3 facts about the EU. True, we need to assert our independence from the USA, especially militarily, but we also need to get out of the EU - in fact the EU needs to end and be replaced with a different sort of co-operation between national governments - something more transparent and more accesible to 'democratic' control. When were the EU accounts last approved - last I heard it was 10 years ago!

Anyway, our 'rulers' always seem to be able to opt out of labour and human rights legislation, but always seem bound by anything that hurts workers.

Carl Jones
11 September 2007 at 11:30

Hi Bob, well done, a technical knockout on Red Ken..words are cheap.

I was reading the Newstatesman union pullout, it read more like a corporate business plan and I was shocked by the unions attitude to golbalisation. Brown wants pay demands inside inflation...but what is the true inflation rate?

About a year ago on BBC 5 Lives "Wake upto Money", everyone on the show agreed that inflation was at, or very near to 6%. Today I`d say its near to 13%. This tend isn`t new, we`ve had years and years where real inflation has been above the official government number. Most ordinary jobs pay the same wages as they did 15-20 years ago. The same can be said for unemployment, officially at 5/6%, but really around 11%.

The relationship between the government and unions seems almost complict. One wonders just how many MI5 agents work for British unions?

I`ve had quite a bit of contact with American business men...most are Republicans. When they visit the UK and Europe, they are shocked by the cohesive structures which form European society...this derived from higher taxes and social policies, such as employment law and benefit systems. In comparison, the United States re still in the dark age.

During the years preceeding Angela Merkel. Germany was being strangled by elite finance, in an effort to force the German government to reform and downgrade the quality of German society. This was being done so that new European states would not aspire to live like the Germans. It now looks as if this flwed policy has stopped. Today, new Europeans are learning their employment values in London and the Southeast of England (generalisation)....low wages...long hours...little health and safety and general employer abuse. This is what will back into Eastern Europe.

As Europe becomes more cohesive, the corporations will down grade European society. This is the only reason why Britain plays the halfway house. If Britain were out of the EU, would London be as important as it is today? And where would all those Polish migrants go? I believe the all the major European powers are working towards a distant focal point which is receeding. Brown could wipe the floor with the Tories if he suggested joining the Euro, but of course, its one big toe in the bath making bubbles...Britain long-game is a Anglo Saxon Europe. The power of public opinion has never been so weak and what there is has been directed at the global warming sham and the illegal invasion of Iraq. Our capitalist society gives us no room for personal desires unless it involves an expensive mortgage, or sucking upto the boss.

I would like to forward my own concept; we need to understand the "nation state" has finished in large parts of the world. Having said that, this reality only applies to corporations and the employed cream...the rest of us are restricted. Even in Europe, the British and French governments are flying in the face of what Europe was supposed to be.

Do I hold any hope? Not really.

topcat
11 September 2007 at 11:55

Perhaps we should ALL join the RMT. It seems to be the only Union that has the bottle to take on management and fight for its members!!

Tommy Judd
11 September 2007 at 13:15

"Tube maintenance [should be] brought back into the public sector. "That is what our members want, for ultimately that is the only way in which their jobs and pensions [will be secure]."

That only works if the taxpayer - in London and elsewhere - is more generous than the private sector. Why should we be? I can think of more deserving charity cases than the Tube's maintenance workers.

KevinBoatang
11 September 2007 at 13:15

Bob, reality check please, Londoners expect a service and many of your members get a hell of a lot of money to provide it. The action you take will never achieve anything other than chaos and it wouldn't surprise me if LU sack the lot and automate the system.

Asmodeus
11 September 2007 at 15:46

Before commenting on the behaviour of Rmt members it would be helpful to have some idea of their annual earnings and pension scheme. Is this possible?

Tommy Judd
11 September 2007 at 16:56

Around £35,000 plus membership of a final-salary pension scheme, free travel (plus for partner) on the entire transport network, and 30 days' annual leave plus 8 public holidays). Y'know - just the usual.

Neil
11 September 2007 at 18:10

Bob Crow - you are an antiquated dinosaur, unfortunately not yet yet immotalised in stone! How dare you claim to know what m'most Londoners' want. You are so far out of touch you haven't got a clue. The rhetoric you use shows your true colours, all fluff and no substance. Everyone else is to blame but you and your cronies. Can you tell us what conditions were met after you called off the strike that had not been met before the start of the strike? For 'Red' Ken to be calling your actions unjustified they really must be. As for the comments of Carl Jones - Carl, I think you have wrapped the foil a little too tightly around your pin head and it is now cutting off the flow of blood. This is the best bit of comedy writing I have read in ages. I thank you for making me laugh.

Carl Jones
11 September 2007 at 23:53

Any time Neil. Next time I`ll keep the foil a little less tight just so you can keep up.

I`d rather see my money line the pockets of RMT workers, than some pencil neck in the city who makes their money by shafting workers here and in the Far East.

BTW; Neil, please could you point out where you lost the plot? The worries of the RMT are felt by many workers in many countries...very willing to help you out.

paul b
12 September 2007 at 04:14

I find it fascinating what easy targets people are who work in essential industries that so many others rely on. The tactic seems to be for management that they can mistreat these workers at will. When the workers have had enough and unite to take strike action, (usually reluctantly, given the nature of their work) the people affected always blame the striking workers, never the management. The media which takes a lot of capital to set up and run, can always be trusted to take the side of capital against labour. After all its in the media's interests to defend capital against militant labour.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

Blears joins the Tories

01 October 2008 16:51

Sombre Tories

01 October 2008 09:10

Tackling homelessness

29 September 2008 18:34

Yet to seal the deal

27 September 2008 09:27

Brown's comeback

23 September 2008 18:21

The need for 'narrative'

23 September 2008 15:43

Time to rein in the wreckless

22 September 2008 20:04

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Blogroll

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker