Registered user login:

Conference blog Homepage

Go on Ming pick a fight!

  • Posted by Lembit Opik
  • 16 September 2007

The Lib Dem frontbencher dismisses talk of a coup against Sir Menzies Campbell insisting there are no serious contenders but suggests he picks fight with somebody to garner a reputation as a 'hard man'

It’s THAT time of year again. I attend Lib Dem conference with dread and anticipation. Dread because it’s a physical and mental marathon to just stick with the conference programme. Anticipation, because it’s my first time at conference as Business and Enterprise Shadow Minister. They’ll want to know what I think about business.

Well, they WILL get to know what I think about business, in very specific terms. For example, a Zero Carbon Britain when it comes to energy generation makes a lot of sense and does get people talking. I think it IS possible - but more about all that at the fringes I’m doing. To his great credit, Ming’s been running with this idea as well now, as has Chris Huhne, so we’ve opened up a rather useful front which has surely got to mean we’re doing more than just talking about it. But the main thing is it’s a real policy, and people can either agree or disagree but they can’t pretend it doesn’t exist as a proposition. By contrast, I sometimes feel we squander conference by being terribly cautious about everything, as if direct and even contentious comments are dangerous. Actually, if we can’t even be honest and challenging with each other, then what exactly are we doing here? So, I’m personally hoping delegates will genuinely have a bit of fire in their belly. We’re meant to be the radical alternative for goodness sake!

I think the other thing about conference this year is all the General Election jitters which affects delegates like loud bangs affect flocks of birds. So we’re all looking at the scarecrow in the middle of the field and waiting to see if he’s going to dissolve Parliament and go to the country. Personally, I think October’s a non-runner for the election date. But some would say if this is my prediction, it’ll definitely happen in October. Anyway, I expect symptoms of early Election Fever will be evident, not least amongst the press who will doubtless prefer to publish long, vapid predictions of possible election outcomes in preference to writing about what’s actually going on at conference. The attitude towards conference blogs like this one is a case in point. The chances of anything positive being reported from it are vanishingly small, but if I launch a personal attack on someone that would make the front page. But that’s not going to happen. Because we’re Liberal Democrats and we like each other. A lot. Funnily enough, this is actually true, I’d say.

There’s also the usual stuff about the Leadership – essential pub chat without which it just wouldn’t be the same. But it’s not a terribly interesting story because there’s no serious challenge to Ming’s leadership. Besides, it’s the Leader’s duty to put up with a certain amount of whinging. It’s partly what he’s for. So the delegates can go home at the end feeling satisfied that “we told him etc.” Free speech is a wonderful thing when you’re not its primary target. I think now John Prescott’s exiting stage left, Ming should consider picking a fight with a particularly annoying delegate and get a reputation as the New Hard Man of British Politics. It would certainly get the headlines.

So, who knows what delights await in the halls and convention centres of Brighton. And, OK, despite the pathos I am looking forward to it. It’s, well, fun. Is that still allowed? Or is “fun” not a political enough description? Don’t care. The day conference stops being fun is the day we’ve either solved all the problems of the country, or we’ve given up. Lib Dems NEVER seem to give up. So here’s to the problems which give us something to talk about, and for having the idealism to try and fix them, here’s three cheers for us!

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

David Lindsay
17 September 2007 at 15:23

What to make of the Lib Dems? Theirs is a wholly inadequate vehicle for any of the vitally important traditions from which they derive: of Gladstone, carefully re-appropriated in the light of his own “Four Doctors”, namely Aristotle, Augustine, Dante and Joseph Butler; of Keynes, Beveridge, and the One Nation politician’s One Nation politician, Lloyd George.

Yet the cause of opposition to the neoconservative war agenda is an important one, though not one for which the rising faction among the Lib Dems will continue to fight. The cause of opposition to the pointless “renewal” of Trident is an important one (and an important reminder that Labour policy towards nuclear weapons had absolutely nothing to do with the creation of the SDP), although the Lib Dems have failed to get their act together properly on this one.

The cause of defending civil liberties is an important one. I have come to see that the causes of an elected second chamber and of changing how MPs are chosen are important ones, although I am profoundly opposed to the specific Lib Dem proposals on these matters.

And the cause of representing systematically marginalised and ignored areas such as the West Country, Mid-Wales, the North and South of Scotland, Northumberland, Merseyside, the more rural parts of Lancashire and County Durham, and parts of London like Southwark and Bermondsey, is an important one.

The people of those and comparable areas, those who want to make our parliamentary system genuinely representative (which must mean all of us), those who want to defend and restore civil liberties (likewise), those who would and do oppose Trident “renewal”, and those who would and do oppose the neoconservative war agenda (and thus neoconservatism itself) are among the many, many, many constituencies now crying for the re-emergence of one or more proper political movements in place of the present hopeless, useless One Party.

The Lib Dems might pretend that they are not part of that One Party, but in fact they are its licensed pretend-dissidents, to keep up the illusion that it faces some sort of opposition.

If you want it to face real opposition that it desperately needs and richly deserves, and not least if you fall into any one or more of the above categories, then what are you doing about it?

gnuneo
19 September 2007 at 03:40

david: are you arguing we need a new party, that has individual liberty *securely* as its base? A new English Revolution? (although personally i strongly prefer the term 'evolutionary', revolutionary is something that revolves ending up where it began...).

if so, we are in agreement. Of all the main parties, the greens and lib-dems are any kind of hope, but the lib-dems are also infiltrated by the 'elite-rule' thinkers, and the greens have far too many anti-democratic elements in them for my tastes as well.

but with over 50% of the wealth of the UK now held by only 1% of the population, it would seem getting funding for such a new party would be tricky, any good ideas on this?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Lembit Opik

Lembit Opik has been Liberal Democrat MP for Montgomeryshire since 1997 and is the party's Shadow Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform

Recent Posts

UKIP not ready for an election

  • By Matt Sandy
  • 05 October 2007

Labour's 'patchy' content

  • By Andrew Mitchell
  • 03 October 2007

O come all ye faithful

  • By Stanley Johnson
  • 02 October 2007

A turning tide?

  • By Alan Duncan
  • 01 October 2007

Upbeat Tories

  • By Anne Milton
  • 01 October 2007

Late nights, long walks and much dashing about

  • By Sam Barratt
  • 28 September 2007

If I were you David...

  • By Ali Miraj
  • 28 September 2007