Fashion models shape up badly against female athletes: but why compare them?
They never said they were role models.
By Martha Gill Published 13 August 2012 12:18
At some point in the closing ceremony last night they brought out the fashion models, and the internet exploded.



Well I disagree - they're not bad role models. They're not role models. They never said they were role models. They're just people who sell clothes. Shona Robison and co are giving the fashion industry far too much credit - as though it represents some cultural zenith. People who are good at sport, or indeed have any particular talent, don't generally become models. In fact these girls used to be known as "mannequins": a term which puts the job much more succinctly in its place.
This is one reason why the show America's Next Top Model is such a farce - because you really don't have to put people through competitive "heats" to judge how good they look in a dress. A more realistic formula (and with more bitchy fun) would be a series of rounds trialling the girls for alternative careers, and seeing which of them still have to be models. You're not qualified to be a doctor, you're too slow to be an athlete, you're not good enough at maths to be an accountant: congratulations, you're still in the running to becoming America's Next Top Model!
We should all stop putting the fashion industry on a pedestal, then bullying it for not deserving to be there. Even if the fashion industry did bulk up its models - using healthy looking, muscular women - as a post-Olympic hoard are urging it to do, everyone has to face up to the fact that walking up and down looking cross is never going to be a particularly inspiring career. Leave Kate Moss and co alone! They look miserable enough as it is.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















4 comments
You're absolutely right that they aren't role models. However I don't think that was the key point.
If we are to set a standard of achievement and beauty wouldn't it be more admirable, socially beneficial and perhaps just plain inspiring to have a concept of beauty based on being as physically fit and healthy as we can?
Instead of obsessing about being slim, or the right shade of whatever, or about how big or shapely some part of our anatomy is; why not find someone attractive for how healthy and happy they appear?
So yes the attack on fashion models was a bit silly; however the idea that athletes can be more beautiful than a malnourished waif with a drug problem? Well maybe that's a good thing?
@Spud
Sorry to hear about the back. Am I right to assume that your job is responsible for the damage done to it?
I hope you're claiming any benefits/statutory sick pay to which you may be entitled. Too many benefit entitlements go unclaimed, which always sickens me but doubly so under a Tory regime.
Get well soon.
"Even if the fashion industry did bulk up its models - using healthy looking, muscular women - as a post-Olympic hoard are urging it to do..."
Wrong 'horde' btw....very shoddy
"Well I disagree - they're not bad role models. They're not role models. They never said they were role models. They're just people who sell clothes. "
So, if "They're just people who sell clothes", what justification is there for including them while neglecting, say, people who sell fish or people who sell car spares?
"Shona Robison and co are giving the fashion industry far too much credit "
No she isn't. She's effectively criticising their inclusion as well as the judgement of the organisers who clearly do regard the fashion industry as representing "some cultural zenith." This is a very confused and silly article; no doubt trotted out in a hurry through the demands of topicality and the requirement to shoehorn in a piece of air-headed social commentary on what was a bit of pointless fun...which I assume more or less sums up the writer's job description.
Nice work if you can get it etc...personally-given that I'm presently out of work due to a f**ked back which will hopefully heal in time to let me return to my usual task of ditch digging and sh*t shovelling until I'm no longer physically capable-if I had a gig like this I might just put a bit of effort in. Obviously it may be that the author has done just that, in which case: how come I spend my time shovelling sh*t when I could churn out this kinda inconsequential frippery in my f**kin sleep?
If it's my lack of a degree, a public school education and family connections then...y'know...fair enough. But how come I left school at 16 without a f**kin certificate to wipe backside on and yet I don't go around using 'hoard' for 'horde'? I'd tell you why, but frankly why would I bother doing that for free when etc etc...
That was my "favourite" bit of the closing ceremony. Whoever came up with the idea of the uniformed 'Fashion Nazis' marching around the stadium deserves recognition. After a break of nearly 80 years we had goose-stepping in an Olympic stadium again.