No smoke without fire
Cessation therapy market lights up as anti-smoking legislation kicks in.
By Amy Baker Published 20 June 2012 16:59
Smoking is on the decrease in the west, aided by the introduction of smoking bans across Europe and some of the US and targeted awareness campaigns highlighting the health risks and encouraging quitting. In 2003, the UK banned tobacco advertising, before banning smoking in public buildings in 2007. In April this year, the UK followed in the footsteps of Iceland, Thailand, Norway, Canada and Ireland in introducing a ban on displaying cigarettes in shops, in an attempt to reduce the appeal of smoking to youngsters. This move has faced serious opposition from Big Tobacco and small retailers, who argue that restricting in-store promotion will hit their sales. However, one sector where the ban isn’t causing a drag is the smoking cessation market. With more and more smokers trying to put out their cigarettes, the opportunities for companies involved in making that process easier has grown steadily.
With smoking estimated to cause six million deaths per year through cancer and heart disease worldwide, the potential in therapies to aid quitting has been recognised in industry. According to GlaxoSmithKline, 70 per cent of smokers want to quit, but less than 5 per cent actually do, and encouraging people to quit represents a massive opportunity for companies willing to enter the market. The big guns have already made the most of this, with GSK and Pfizer dominating smoking cessation. As well as over-the-counter nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs), which can be marketed directly to the consumer, prescription cessation drugs have also entered the market, with Pfizer’s Champix and GSK’s Zyban. Champix generated revenues of £720m in 2011.
NRTs are particularly popular for kicking the habit, especially since the move from prescription to over-the-counter availability, and are still the main method used by smokers to quit – both GSK and Pfizer have made significant profits from over-the-counter prescriptions of NRTs, including patches, gum, lozenges and inhalers. GSK dominates with the brands Nicorette and NicoDerm in the US, and ploughed £30m into TV advertising for Nicorette in 2009–2010.
It hasn’t all been positive though for the industry – although the patient populations are increasing and driving overall revenues, confidence has been dented in prescription medication. Pfizer’s major product is Champix, which has hit the headlines multiple times as stories of patient suicides and mood swings have emerged, resulting in multiple lawsuits, negative media coverage and a decline in revenues between 2010 and 2011 of 5 per cent. The dramatic nature of the side effects has grabbed the attention of the public. More recently, concerns were raised over possible heart problems as a result of taking Champix. However, the controversial drug remains one of the more effective ways of quitting smoking. Safety concerns have also been raised for Zyban in similar areas.
The Asian markets present a considerable future opportunity for companies in smoking cessation, but awareness of the dangers of smoking and government intervention remain low in these regions. According to WHO estimates in 2010, Asia contains over half of the world’s smokers, while China has a male smoking prevalence as high as 53 per cent. These figures suggest that a considerable market for smoking cessation exists, but is as yet largely untapped because of cultural attitudes to smoking and a lack of public health efforts to combat the addiction by governments.
Overall, the smoking cessation market five years on from the ban is still growing at a healthy rate and is expected to continue to do so over the next five years. Anti-smoking legislation and the huge potential patient population are all driving the market even as the number of new smokers and the overall smoking population decline in Europe and the US. Should any companies in the future crack the Asian markets, this also offers a massive opportunity.
Amy Baker is a Life Science Analyst from GBI Research
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















6 comments
The rationale for smoking bans posits that smoking is optional, whereas breathing is not. Therefore, proponents say, smoking bans exist to protect breathing people from the effects of second-hand smoke, which include an increased risk of heart disease, cancer, emphysema, and other diseases. Laws implementing bans on indoor smoking have been introduced by many countries in various forms over the years, with some legislators citing scientific evidence that shows tobacco smoking is harmful to the smokers themselves and to those inhaling second-hand smoke. by http: //klinikpsikis.com/
Champix is known as the suicide drug because it affects the brain and many experience terrible nightmares. The most successful way to quit smoking, if you really want to, is with the Alan Carr method which has a success rate of over 50%.
NRT Failure Rate Soars to 98.4%
New revelations confirm that Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) has a documented long term failure rate of 98.4%.
PRLog (Press Release) - Apr 03, 2009 -
New revelations confirm that Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) has a documented long term failure rate of 98.4%.
NRT is the Government’s recommended treatment for its smoking cessation programmes and is heavily funded by the tax-payer.
Pro-choice group Freedom2choose are alarmed at these revelations and the obvious waste of tax-payers’ funds. Colin Grainger, vice chairman of the group states, “NRT products are obviously unfit for the purpose for which they are sold. This is fraud, wrong and immoral.”
Freedom2choose have previously highlighted alternative ways to successfully quit smoking, including the Allen Carr method, with a documented success rate of 58% for those choosing to give up. The Allen Carr method even promises a money back guarantee to those that don’t successfully quit.
“More worryingly,” continues Colin Grainger “is the shock that the scientists who put the study together even work for the manufacturers of NRT. This clearly shows how the Big Pharmaceutical companies influence the outcome of studies.”
The revelations were originally made public by long-term anti-smoking campaigner Professor Michael Siegel who states “With a long-term smoking cessation percentage of only 1.6%, one can hardly call NRT treatment an "effective" intervention. In fact, the logical conclusion from this paper is that NRT was a dismal intervention.”
NRT Failure Rate Soars to 98.4%
New revelations confirm that Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) has a documented long term failure rate of 98.4%.
PRLog (Press Release) - Apr 03, 2009 -
New revelations confirm that Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) has a documented long term failure rate of 98.4%.
NRT is the Government’s recommended treatment for its smoking cessation programmes and is heavily funded by the tax-payer.
Pro-choice group Freedom2choose are alarmed at these revelations and the obvious waste of tax-payers’ funds. Colin Grainger, vice chairman of the group states, “NRT products are obviously unfit for the purpose for which they are sold. This is fraud, wrong and immoral.”
Freedom2choose have previously highlighted alternative ways to successfully quit smoking, including the Allen Carr method, with a documented success rate of 58% for those choosing to give up. The Allen Carr method even promises a money back guarantee to those that don’t successfully quit.
“More worryingly,” continues Colin Grainger “is the shock that the scientists who put the study together even work for the manufacturers of NRT. This clearly shows how the Big Pharmaceutical companies influence the outcome of studies.”
The revelations were originally made public by long-term anti-smoking campaigner Professor Michael Siegel who states “With a long-term smoking cessation percentage of only 1.6%, one can hardly call NRT treatment an "effective" intervention. In fact, the logical conclusion from this paper is that NRT was a dismal intervention.”
NRT Failure Rate Soars to 98.4%
New revelations confirm that Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) has a documented long term failure rate of 98.4%.
PRLog (Press Release) - Apr 03, 2009 -
New revelations confirm that Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) has a documented long term failure rate of 98.4%.
NRT is the Government’s recommended treatment for its smoking cessation programmes and is heavily funded by the tax-payer.
Pro-choice group Freedom2choose are alarmed at these revelations and the obvious waste of tax-payers’ funds. Colin Grainger, vice chairman of the group states, “NRT products are obviously unfit for the purpose for which they are sold. This is fraud, wrong and immoral.”
Freedom2choose have previously highlighted alternative ways to successfully quit smoking, including the Allen Carr method, with a documented success rate of 58% for those choosing to give up. The Allen Carr method even promises a money back guarantee to those that don’t successfully quit.
“More worryingly,” continues Colin Grainger “is the shock that the scientists who put the study together even work for the manufacturers of NRT. This clearly shows how the Big Pharmaceutical companies influence the outcome of studies.”
The revelations were originally made public by long-term anti-smoking campaigner Professor Michael Siegel who states “With a long-term smoking cessation percentage of only 1.6%, one can hardly call NRT treatment an "effective" intervention. In fact, the logical conclusion from this paper is that NRT was a dismal intervention.”
Reference: NRT Failure Rate 98.4% - http://www.tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/
http://www.prlog.org/10211087-nrt-failure-rate-soars-to-984.html
Theres just as many smokers today as there were in the 1950s. These jerks simply used the increases in population to claim a reduction!
Smoking cessation my arse:
NRT Failure Rate Soars to 98.4%
New revelations confirm that Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) has a documented long term failure rate of 98.4%.
PRLog (Press Release) - Apr 03, 2009 -
New revelations confirm that Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) has a documented long term failure rate of 98.4%.
NRT is the Government’s recommended treatment for its smoking cessation programmes and is heavily funded by the tax-payer.
Pro-choice group Freedom2choose are alarmed at these revelations and the obvious waste of tax-payers’ funds. Colin Grainger, vice chairman of the group states, “NRT products are obviously unfit for the purpose for which they are sold. This is fraud, wrong and immoral.”
Freedom2choose have previously highlighted alternative ways to successfully quit smoking, including the Allen Carr method, with a documented success rate of 58% for those choosing to give up. The Allen Carr method even promises a money back guarantee to those that don’t successfully quit.
“More worryingly,” continues Colin Grainger “is the shock that the scientists who put the study together even work for the manufacturers of NRT. This clearly shows how the Big Pharmaceutical companies influence the outcome of studies.”
The revelations were originally made public by long-term anti-smoking campaigner Professor Michael Siegel who states “With a long-term smoking cessation percentage of only 1.6%, one can hardly call NRT treatment an "effective" intervention. In fact, the logical conclusion from this paper is that NRT was a dismal intervention.”
Reference: NRT Failure Rate 98.4% - http://www.tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/
http://www.prlog.org/10211087-nrt-failure-rate-soars-to-984.html