Holy lands welcome vegetarian McDonald's

Pilgrims can now eat their McSpicy Paneers.

 

As reported by the Financial Times this morning, McDonald’s is due to open its first vegetarian restaurants in the Indian villages of Amristar and Katra, Sikh and Hindu pilgrimage sites respectively:

“A vegetarian store makes absolute sense in the places which are famous as pilgrimage sites,” said Rajesh Kumar Maini, a spokesman for McDonald’s India.

The article goes on to state that the branches will sell existing vegetarian options, such as the McSpicy Paneer, and hope to expand the range.

McDonald’s, for all its rampant Americanisation of the world, has always been good at giving people what they want. For instance, in Portugal, you can get beer with your meal, while in Indonesia the chicken and rice combo has proved more popular. (Here’s a list of “weird” menu items from around the world). The truth is, McDonald’s responds to market demands because it’s good for business, and is, in this sense, one of the few truly democratic institutions we have (I suppose advertising sways things, but still, we’re not complete idiots). The Amristar and Katra branches allude to the fact that if people really cared about animal rights, McDonald’s would go vegetarian. And while you could argue that the conglomerate epitomises and perpetuates consumerism, I cannot think of a good less snobby; unlike Starbucks, it is not built around a culture of conspicuous consumption, and is one of the few things that is affordable for most (see Andy Warhol on Coca-cola).

That said, McDonald’s does make every high street and holy land a bit less interesting and a bit more like every other place you’ve been.

Photograph: Getty Images
New Statesman
Show Hide image

Quiz: Can you identify fake news?

The furore around "fake" news shows no sign of abating. Can you spot what's real and what's not?

Hillary Clinton has spoken out today to warn about the fake news epidemic sweeping the world. Clinton went as far as to say that "lives are at risk" from fake news, the day after Pope Francis compared reading fake news to eating poop. (Side note: with real news like that, who needs the fake stuff?)

The sweeping distrust in fake news has caused some confusion, however, as many are unsure about how to actually tell the reals and the fakes apart. Short from seeing whether the logo will scratch off and asking the man from the market where he got it from, how can you really identify fake news? Take our test to see whether you have all the answers.

 

 

In all seriousness, many claim that identifying fake news is a simple matter of checking the source and disbelieving anything "too good to be true". Unfortunately, however, fake news outlets post real stories too, and real news outlets often slip up and publish the fakes. Use fact-checking websites like Snopes to really get to the bottom of a story, and always do a quick Google before you share anything. 

Amelia Tait is a technology and digital culture writer at the New Statesman.