Return to: Home | Blogs | Brian Coleman

Time to abolish the City of London?

The Tory politician calls for the abolition of the corporation that governs London's square mile and criticises its chairman

So at long last after endless media speculation we have a decision from Gordon Brown: Crossrail will be built.

Never mind whether this project is still viable or practical having been first proposed fourteen years ago. Never mind that it has no benefit at all for most actual Londoners as opposed to commuters from the Home Counties.

The Government has bullied and cajoled the City Corporation, the business community and the Mayor of London to stump up the £16 billion required to fund this bribe for the election that never was.

The few days running up to the announcement that gave the go ahead to the project was a typical British bodge job. The deputy director of the CBI appeared on the Today Programme to announce they were very happy with the proposals for a supplementary business rate in London only to have three of his largest retail members, Tescos, Sainsburys and John Lewis partnership on the phone within an hour saying how cross they were.

The Lord Mayor of London was prevailed upon to call an extraordinary meeting of the Court of Common Council for the first time in living memory to roll over to the Government’s demands that the City Corporation cough up £300 million of their accumulated wealth , the so called “City cash” to make up the perceived shortfall.

The role of the City Corporation or the Corporation of the City of London as it has just rebranded itself, in this whole matter bears some investigation.

Unlike proper Local Authorities the Corporation has no Leader of the Council and indeed was immune from the provisions of the 2000 Local Government Act and therefore has an unofficial leader in the Chairman of its Policy and Resources Committee currently Mr Michael Snyder.

As the City of London does not have any Party Politics it is replaced by the much more vicious personality politics and Michael Snyder who is currently serving the final year as Chairman has his fare share of critics.

Indeed his nickname among his many enemies on the Court of Common Council is 'Lord Voldermort' and just like his two predecessors (Michael Cassidy who bizarrely thought he could run for Mayor of London in 2000, and Dame Judith Mayhew whose reward for doing the Government’s bidding was a disastrous period as Master of Kings College) is perceived to have become far too powerful and in his desperation to receive a knighthood regularly pops round to Number 10, City Hall and the Treasury to charm Messrs Brown, Livingstone and Darling.

Apparently the City Corporation holds about £1 billion in City Cash the interest for which pays for the many (on the whole excellent) services that the City provides to the rest of London and also for the endless and lavish hospitality dished out to the Great and the Good at Guildhall, Mansion House and sundry Livery Halls, (I suspect that my invitations to such functions will now cease to the benefit of my substantial waist line).

This money built up over Centuries is held in trust by the Corporation on behalf of all the people of London and quite why the current members of the Corporation feel they can surrender it at the behest of this current Government I cannot understand. The exact figures remain a mystery as the matter as with so much City Corporation business was discussed in secret.

Whilst the tradition, pomp and ceremony of the City of London adds much to our Capital's life, the politics of the Corporation would benefit considerably from more openness and democracy. Quite why the City Aldermen should reject candidates for the top jobs of Sheriff and Lord Mayor on the grounds that they are Gay, female or an Evangelical Christian is beyond me.

One senior London Tory suggested to me that abolition of the Corporation in its current Political form was long overdue and a number are now saying that the time has come for all three Political parties to run slates of candidates in City elections to give the voters a proper choice.

Crossrail may well benefit the Corporation in the short term but the long term Political damage may not be worth a few trains from Maidenhead

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

5 comments from readers

SheriffLittle
10 October 2007 at 18:41

Crossrail will increase transport capacity in London by ten per cent. It will link Heathrow with the West End, the City and Docklands. In no way is this of no benefit at all to Londoners, or just a few trains from Maidenhead!

kd
11 October 2007 at 11:19

I fully agree with and endorse the statement in Brian Coleman's column as follows:

"Never mind that it has no benefit at all for most actual Londoners as opposed to commuters from the Home Counties."

Muhammad Haque

Organiser

Khoodeelaar!

No to Crossrail hole Bill

London E1

1118 Hrs

Thursday 11 October 2007

Tom Knott
12 October 2007 at 18:32

The West End already has the Heathrow Express. For the City and Docklands it only needs the uprating of the existing North London Line. There is the chance also for a Southern Loop as well with more uprating of other lines. And all for a quarter of the price.

HiveO
16 October 2007 at 16:36

Well done to Gordon Brown, Ken Livingstone and the City of London Corporation for having the courage to get this massively overdue project underway at long long last. Its a shame some of the nimby politicians from the surburban burroughs haven't got similar vision or any for that matter.

TULOSE3
23 October 2007 at 17:00

Excellent news for South East London with the Woolwich Station linking areas like Thamesmead to the rest of London.The London Borough of Greenwich is finally being recognised as an important link between Central London,the City via the East Thames Corridor to Kent.Brian's attack on the Corporation are misplaced in an article about Crossrail.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

Up the City of London

16 January 2008 11:54

A few cans of Hairspray

02 January 2008 12:01

Serving should be a vocation

20 December 2007 12:31

United with Livingstone

04 December 2007 11:43

Let's hear it for Charlie...

19 November 2007 12:56

Costs saved, lives lost

05 November 2007 16:45

The 'desecration' of Cyprus

22 October 2007 11:34

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Blogroll

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker