Return to: Home | Blogs | Ben's Blog

Dark days for Brown

Is the situation worse for Gordon Brown than it was for John Major in the dying days of the last Tory administration?

It's all looking rather bleak for Gordon Brown. In fact, if you agree with veteran Conservative politician John Gummer, the situation's actually worse for the prime minister than it was for John Major as his government faltered to extinction.

Writing this week on newstatesman.com, Gummer says: "I fought my first election more than forty years ago and I can’t remember anything comparable. Even as a cabinet minister living through the dying days of John Major’s Government - attacked on every side and beset by swivel-eyed revanchists – it wasn’t like this."

The ex-environment secretary expresses sympathy for Brown adding that he finds the sharpness of the attacks "disconcertingly unfair". You can read Gummer's article here.

Meanwhile David Miliband writes in the Guardian about the odds being against a Labour victory when Britain next votes and talks about turning it around for the party by offering real change. He doesn't mention Gordon Brown at all. And nor did he later rule out a leadership challenge. Although he did insist he wasn't running a campaign.

Either way ex-minister Denis Macshane thinks Miliband was spot on.

Writing on newstatesman.com he berates critics of the foreign secretary: "Instead of welcoming his rallying call to attack the Tories and to support the Government and prime minister the briefers are back running Labour into the ground. I hope Miliband continues to make his case and the maggots briefing against him are squashed."

Meanwhile Home Secretary Jacqui Smith is in bullish form arguing her party has everything to play for after the summer recess.

Like Miliband, Smith is keen to remind us of what she sees as Labour's achievements. But does anyone want to listen?

In the past few months I've been to a couple of meetings organised by the Fabians with Labour MPs and others to talk about presenting a vision for the future. At the last gathering - just as parliament was breaking up for summer recess - I suggested people needed to be reminded of the number of new schools and hospital buildings built since 1997. I also suggested they get local people (activists or otherwise) to tell the story of how these services have improved lives.

Under the Tories the health service creaked. They were like landlords running down a listed building until everyone agreed it had to be demolished. They had the same policy with the railways - privatisation of BR along with the citizens' charter being the memorable legacies of that political era.

Fortunately Labour was elected in time to save the NHS and many of the facilities are scarcely recognisable compared to when Major was chucked out of Downing Street. I haven't even mentioned portacabin classrooms.

There have been achievements - they need to be trumpeted. But, yes, there also has to be a vision for the future - maybe universal free school meals or a bonfire of the quangos as part of a wider vision for a more transparent, accountable government.

Whatever Labour can claim, it certainly isn't that it ruled for all the people. Whole parts of the UK remain stuck in a kind of economic purdah unseen, for the most part, by the rest of us.

The authoritarian controlling tendencies of New Labour have helped no-one except David Cameron who, astonishingly, is managing to sell himself as reasonable and quasi-progressive.

Opponents of the New Labour project from within the party meanwhile are quick to return to old battle grounds.

Alan Simpson is a good example in his article for newstatesman.com in which he writes:

"For months now, a group of ex-ministers have been cruising the corridors and cafeteria of Parliament in search of stray Labour MPs to descend on. “Carruthers, dear boy/girl, we haven’t spoken for ages, but have you got a moment? What are we going to do about Gordon? He is leading the party into disaster. I know you don’t want to lose your seat at the election, but what do we do?”

"If we were children, the process would be called ‘grooming’. It has little to do with the well-being of the MP or the party. Most of the approaches are coming from the remnants of the Blair Witch-Way Project, looking for a way back to power. Their interests are more in shafting the Labour Party than in saving it."

I suspect it's going to be a very silly silly season...

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

14 comments from readers

Jonny Mac
01 August 2008 at 12:29

"....David Cameron who, astonishingly, is managing to sell himself as reasonable and quasi-progressive."

What a bizarre thing to say.

Presumably you say that because not only do you not think he is reasonable and quasi-progressive (whatever that means), but that you think it's surprising that he is managing successfully to create a false impression of himself.

But what are your grounds for doubting that Cameron is "reasonable"? And considering that most people think that he's an astute and effective communicator, and an effective politician, why on earth do you find it "astonishing" that he has managed to "sell himself" as such?

Admin
01 August 2008 at 14:12

It's not bizarre at all. I sincerely doubt he's reasonable given the kind of politics he's been signed up to in the past when he wasn't a progressive in any shape or form. The way he's presenting himself now is simply opportunism - the Lexus following the bicycle is the perfect illustration. He projects an image but look a few feet behind him and you'll see it's not real. I'm astonished everyone can't see that. Ben Davies.

gnuneo
01 August 2008 at 21:38

nice one ben, both article and comment reply. Can i ask who you see as being a capable potential leader from the left of the Labour party? Most other commentators seem quite happy to replace brown with yet another bland right-wing moderniser that could as happily be a tory as labour, whether or not you would agree with him/her, or indeed support him/her, i would appreciate a suggestion from you to look at. Are there ANY social democrats left in Labour? :/

knave
02 August 2008 at 07:09

Nice one Ben.

Also it is good to see the commentators add to the post. Only Martin seems to do that. Although it would be great to see him expand his arguments and ideas.

knave
02 August 2008 at 07:13

Jonny

For somebody who says he is not a Tory it is pretty obvious who your going to vote for.

I know you hate the present government, your non aligned, blah. blah, blah

Isn't the true reason is that you are inately conservative by nature.

Which I might add is not an insult.

Jonty Stang
03 August 2008 at 23:34

"Your going to vote"?

Dear Lord, were you educated under a Labour government? Or a Tory government? Both hopeless of course, but neither of them have banned books on spelling or grammar.

(Which, I may add, is an insult).

knave
04 August 2008 at 06:12

Jonty

My little Tory friend.

I do apologize. I am dyslexic but that of course is no excuse.

I love the word Jonty.

Is it short for Johnny in pony club circles.

Again I do apologize.

knave
04 August 2008 at 07:08

Also Jonty

I don't believe a word about you, Annabel Curruthers and the riding crop at last years young conservative ball.

Dash nonsense I say

Admin
04 August 2008 at 09:27

Hi Gnuneo, I may be wrong about this but - unless we want a Tory government - another leadership change would be bad news at this point. What's needed is a sense of energy and some eye-catching reforms and policies. Brown needs to ask himself both what was best and what was popular about the last few years. He used to think "best when we're boldest, best when we're Labour". As to a serious challenger from the left? Well it's not going to be Meacher or McDonnell...

Cheers, Ben.

Boadicea
04 August 2008 at 17:56

New hospitals and schools? We have one here in Norwich - on the rocky foundation of PFI. The consortium which built and financed it have just rejigged the finance to make themselves £60,000,000. You daft Dave Sparts are too thick to understand the underlying mess which PFI has inflicted on our children, let alone on our own generation.

Viscount Firm
04 August 2008 at 19:49

Dear lady, I'm so sorry you too have been troubled by the Trots! I imagine they have blighted your whole life.

gnuneo
05 August 2008 at 01:32

ben: he needs to do that which he believes he cannot do.

he needs to challenge the neo-cons, and leave Iraq NOW, and inform them that if they attack Iran, then the UK will oppose them at all levels.

he needs to challenge the corporations across the whole spectrum, and stop the privatisation-by-stealth at the very least (see comments about PFI above).

he needs to be serious about combating global pollution, and to move us into a post-oil economy - NOT buying brand new aircraft carriers.

he needs to remember that he is OUR representative, not *THEIRS*.

this is what could make him electable again, they would be good first moves in that direction anyway. You're probably right about changing leaders now, but he's really got to pull his finger out. Right now Camoron could take a 2yr holiday in Columbia, be in every tabloid saying he doesn't give a crap about the British who earn less than £500,000, and want to bring back whipping for cheeky servants, and he'd still waltz into Downing Street.

Admin
05 August 2008 at 10:12

Well I can only say I share your anger about the Iraq war and other aspects of foreign policy. Until I gave one of my votes to Ken Livingstone at the last mayoral election I hadn't voted Labour for some years because of Blair's conduct. As for PFI/PPP - many were ridiculously complex and I have big reservations about the deals that were struck in particular the very long 'mortgages' that have been part of this process. But all that said there are huge improvements in the infrastructure of our schools and hospitals. It would never have happened under the Tories.

gnuneo
06 August 2008 at 23:55

ben, i don't want to be so negative, but i would like to point out that the full privatisation package for the UK is on the cards - the 'Washington Consensus' in all its glory.

investments in Education and Health infrastructure, for *some* senior Govt apparatchiks (in the Tories, new-Labour & especially the Civil Service - "independent advice", laughable) are merely a investment towards the private sector in the continued privatisation program - seem unlikely? Check out the vast subsidies handed to virtually ALL the industries privatised so far, from Thatcher onwards, with the tax-payer always picking up as much of the bill as the Treasury and the concerned citizenry would stomach. You will note the current PFI/PPP structures fully continue this dishonourable tradition, especially within Education.

Not happen under the Tories? Why not? They have the same paymasters, and the same policies. Most of the 'investments' in Health have gone towards paying the Pharmaceutical industries higher bills, or on paying more for nurses from Manpower and their ilk, instead of in-house services, or on paying the large corporate construction firms. In essence, most of the 'new money' has been funnelled directly into the large corporations and tax-evading Multi-nationals.

again, why wouldn't the Tories have done this? It is, after all is said and done, a neo-liberal, Thatcherite policy. We got rid of Major, and received a junior member of his cabinet instead, one holier-than-thou grinning B'Liar.

i can completely imagine a Camoronite Govt employing the same speech-writers, the same spin-doctors, and the same 'think-tanks' as the current bunch do, with as little change in policy.

The worst part is that this bunch of craven smirkers will be on our TVs all the time then, with their not-so-secret contempt for the majority of People in the country written across their faces, without even the possibility of 'back-bench' revolts from Conservative Traditionalists (as new-Labour had from its Labour Traditionalists, upset at the loss of traditional British freedoms), or even a strong Upper Chamber any-more, as effectively opposed Thatcher. Yes, it is true, Brown and HenchPersons are still preferable to having the Tories back in power.

BUT: do you really feel that new-Labour *deserve* to win another term in office?

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

Miliband and more

19 February 2009 12:43

This week at the NS

16 February 2009 13:02

Thank you Oliver Postgate

09 December 2008 09:53

Crossing Timmy Mallett

27 November 2008 14:45

No room for bigots

11 November 2008 13:12

London's loss, Caracas' gain

29 August 2008 16:49

Trinny and Susannah fats your lot

13 August 2008 13:39

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Blogroll

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker