New York City welcome

Jonn Elledge

Published 27 October 2008

Jonn Elledge begins his North American Odyssey in the traditional manner - stuck in a queue waiting to be dealt with by none-too-friendly border officials

In the immigration hall at New York's Kennedy airport there hangs a picture of a happy, helpful custom official. Beneath it, in large, friendly letters, a caption promises that the US Custom and Border Protection Agency 'pledges to cordially greet and welcome you, and treat you with courtesy, dignity and respect.'

As reassuring as this is, it's of precious little use when you find yourself standing in line for an hour and a half, surrounded by overheated Welsh teenagers, at a time your body insists is 3am.

The reason for the hold up was that the ever helpful Department of Homeland Security now requires every foreigner who enters the US to provide two finger prints, a retinal scan, and a convincing justification for their visit. Doing this 400 times takes a while.

After we'd been waiting 20 minutes, the tannoy crackled and an irritable voice warned us that any mobile phones in use in the queue would be confiscated and destroyed. After 30 minutes, a second voice chided us that our bags were clogging up the carousel, and announced they were about to be dumped on the floor. After 40, another flight landed, the queue doubled and three of the five immigration booths in use were helpfully designated "US Citizens only".

This combination of delays and suspicion is likely to be familiar to anyone who's visited the US in recent years. A 2006 survey ranked the country as the most unfriendly in the world to international travellers, with half of respondents complaining that immigration officials are rude and two-thirds admitting they expected to be detained because they "said the wrong thing". (One friend of mine once made the mistake of wondering aloud what the hold up was. The customs officials sent him to the back of the queue.)

None of this seems to be worrying the authorities too much: there are, after all, more votes in tight security and immigration controls than there are in being nice to foreigners.

But the tourism industry, at least, is starting to fret. The Discover America Partnership, which sponsored the survey, warned it was denting revenues by driving visitors away. Others worry that it will wreck the country's competitive edge. The more unwelcome foreign grad students feel in the US, the more likely they are to stay at home - and the more likely it is the next Google will come from Bangalore rather than Berkeley.

Only after nearly two hours of courteous treatment at the hands of US immigration we were finally allowed to escape the airport and make our way to the hotel we'd booked in Manhattan. This, it turned out, was a former transient hostel with bin bags on the mattresses and a sign on the wall reading 'No spitting.'

Welcome to New York.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

22 comments from readers

jmy9595
27 October 2008 at 15:21

1) Photos are taken of visitors, they are not retinal scans.

2) Cell phones can be confiscated because: a) signs are posted to that effect; b) they like any other electronic device can be used as detonators or to communicate with persons outside the Customs area to coordinate attacks.

3) Booths "helpfully designated" US citizens only are to facilitate processing of passengers who do not require the fingerprints and photographing. After US citizens are done, anyone may use any booth.

4) If you picked a former transient hotel because you insisted on being in Manhattan itself and thought that there was actual cheap lodging there, blame yourself for not doing research.

tonyk
27 October 2008 at 19:29

Yet another dreary article by some Brit about entry into the USA - almost certainly including invented indignities -my British family have made multiple journeys to the US from the UK since 911 and have had no problems. You are quite welcome to stay home.

Tony K (ex Brit)

Carl Jones
27 October 2008 at 21:35

I`ve heard and read about some shocking entry/exit stories. I won`t bother going through them as I`m likely to get an earful from "tonyk".

I would like to remind readers that EVERYONE who enters and exits the US is given a rating by the FBI....you get points based on SUSPISION ALONE (its based on a persons opinion)!!! These points accrue, you might make 10 US visits, over 10 years and nothing will happen, then all of a sudden, you become a serious threat to the USoA and life as you know comes to an end. This is not fear mongering, its just a fact of NWO life. Big Brother is here.lol

jmy9595
28 October 2008 at 05:05

And what's your source on this FBI person's suspicion rating, Carl? I'd be curious to know.

Rab
28 October 2008 at 06:19

Well, I guess these things can happen, but whenever I have flown in and out of NY over recent years the officials have been perfectly polite. Delays occasionally but that's life. I have had far worse (rude, arrogant) experiences with spotty BAA offcials during flight transfers at Heathrow.

Jonny Mac
28 October 2008 at 11:43

I travelled to Mexico via Houston in January 2003. The experience was so horrendous - four hour queue to get processed (and we weren't even entering the US, just catching a connecting flight, which we very nearly missed: lots of distressed people in the queue did miss their connections), jumpy guntoting officials watching the queue, CONSTANT loud and sinister messages over the tannoy ("inappropriate comments and jokes may be taken to constitute a threat against the facility and will be dealt with accordingly" was a particularly charming one that I still remember), everyone's luggage left abandoned in the middle of arrivals, etc etc, that Mrs Jonny Mac now refuses to travel to the US.

Good for you tonyk, but we had an absolutely shitty experience. i suspect NY is much better than other airports, and hopefully things are generally better now than they were in 2003. Back then it really was like entering a warzone.

jmy9595
28 October 2008 at 14:24

OK, Carl, I'll answer my own question. The FBI has nothing to do with issuing "ratings" on inbound passengers. Passengers with outstanding criminal warrants are picked up--that's a given. Others are looked at more closely based on suspicious travel patterns and observed behavior at the port of entry. It's not suspicion and hunches.

Carl Jones
28 October 2008 at 16:49

jmy9595

It goes without saying, the FBI are into everything....much like MI5.LOL

When I first read about this policy, it was the FBI who were behind it.

http://www.dhs.gov.com/alibrary/assets/privacy/privacy_pia_t...

You will note that BDO`s (behavior detection officers) make a visual assessment. depending one how they feel about you, they then enter their opinions into the data base, this creates a "spot"....now please forgive me, but the BDO must give the computer file a rating and every time you fly, this rating will most likely increase.

I didn`t read the entire PDF. But you should pay particular attention to 6.2 and 6.4.. The passeger is rated on OSERVATION only. 6.4 indicates a scoring system. Of course, they will have a lot of data on you before you are interviewed by the NWO. The BDO is likely to form an opinion on you before they even eye you up and down.

Could add more, but now quite bored and have no intention of every going to the US....however, I do believe I`ve got a bunk in a REX-84 concentration camp.LOL

Carl Jones
28 October 2008 at 16:52

Sorry about the link.

http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/privacy/privacy_pia_tsa_s...

jmy9595
28 October 2008 at 18:30

The PDF refers to recently implemented training techniques of TSA (aviation security), not immigration officials.

jmy9595
28 October 2008 at 18:32

> Could add more, but now quite bored and have no intention of every going to the US....however, I do believe I`ve got a bunk in a REX-84 concentration camp.LOL

You'd be the only one not coming here, judging by the millions of tourists I encountered daily when I lived in NYC, so we'll get by without you. I don't know offhand what REX-84 is, but concentration camp humor is rarely funny.

Carl Jones
28 October 2008 at 20:13

jmy9595.....LOL

It might be recent.....and its recent because it wasn`t as automated and it doesn`t matter who does it....you are observed and someone rates your supposed terror risk....its just some jerks opinion and then it gets logged......EVERYTIME YOU GO TO CHECK IN, you are observed....if you collect enough points, your life will become a NWO hell.LOL

WELCOME TO AMERIKA.LOL

REX-84 is an official US government programme to build HUGE detention facilities (some can hold over 100,000). A few years ago, spending was increased by over $350 million.....these presently empty concentration camps are warm, lit and fully staffed....I just hope my bunk number is either 911, or 77.LOL

jmy9595
28 October 2008 at 21:38

Well, it does matter who does it actually because this blog entry is about the welcome from immigration officials and the behavior observation is done by TSA, whom the arriving passenger does not enounter until Immigration and Customs are both cleared. Customs and Border Protection and TSA are two very distinct branches under Homeland Security, believe me. I've been pulled aside plenty of times myself just because I bought my ticket late or on someone else's credit card. It's not nearly the ordeal or Big Brother incident you're making it out to be.

Carl Jones
29 October 2008 at 05:20

Menezes was alledgedly shot by police, of course, you can take their word for it as the hide behind screens. But there is one thing we do know, there were at least 2 members of the military who were engaged in a "SURVEILANCE OPERATION. I once encountered an alledged policeman at LHR....I can tell that there is no way he was a copper...he was military.

So please tell me, when you get to the airport and get to checkin, where does on incounter a BDO (BEHAViOR DETECTION OFFICER)? I don`t believe it would be safe for me to aatempt a trip to the USoA, but I have no doubt that BDO`s are working with immigration and the FBI and all of those on the floor will wear the same/very similar uniforms.

Jane Greene
29 October 2008 at 09:15

Gosh Carl it must be so exciting to be at the centre of so many intelligence conspiracies. Must add real spice to your drab little life.

Carl Jones
29 October 2008 at 09:44

Hi Jane, my "drab little life".....I don`t know if its drab, or not, I`ve never really thought about it.LOL

Hey guys and gals in the SIS community, you really must stop putting out this PROPAGANDA that I`m a "shil" and at the heart of so many intelligence conspiracies.lol

BTW jane, I`d say your life is pretty drab to take the time to make shallow personal attacks at 9.15am.....where are you I wonder.....Thames House, Vauxhall? Could it be the NS`s office, or maybe GCHQ, or one of their homeworks who are paid to crawl around the WEB searching for prey??????lol

Of course Jane, I`m just doing a BDO on you...looking at you up and down making my cyber assesment of you.lol

realdeal
29 October 2008 at 09:50

If you don't like it.. go to Canada.

realdeal
29 October 2008 at 09:52

By the way, would you like some cheese with that whine?

Carl Jones
29 October 2008 at 11:00

realdeal, I`d consider going anywhere but Canada and the US. I usually drink in the evenings and I`ve just had brunch...tempted to LOL, but now very bored.

sweety
30 October 2008 at 03:00

Apart from Singapore, US. entry is possibly the most pleasant and easy anywhere. Almost like Britain used to be!

Carl Jones
30 October 2008 at 11:05

sweety, so you are into S&M? What I`m trying to imply, is that you get your pleasures from fringe activities?

Being very honest, I don`t know anyone who like going through a US airport and this includes lots of Amerikans.

jmy9595
04 November 2008 at 01:15

Carl, this BDO that you keep referring to is again only TSA, has northing to do with Immigration or Customs. Each agency has its own patterns or behaviors to look for and they rarely have anything to do with the FBI.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Jonn Elledge

Jonn Elledge is newstatesman.com's US elections blogger
email: jonnelledge@googlemail.com

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker