MPs attack Network Rail on its transparency
Public Accounts Committee says is it "fiction" that Network Rail operates as private sector company.
By Alice Gribbin Published 13 March 2012
Parliament's spending watchdog, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), has released a scathing report on Network Rail's financial operations and transparency. The Department for Transport is also held culpable for allowing the rail company to function as a seemingly part-private, part-public company.
Network Rail receives over £3bn annually in funding from the Department of Transport, which also underwrites its debts of over £25bn.
Despite these costs to the taxpayer -- as if it Network Rail were a public company -- it is not held accountable to Parliament and thus avoids the scrutiny it would be due. The report claims that the limited by guarantee company, which owns and operates most of the rail infrastructure in the UK, "maintains the fiction that [it] is a private-sector company." The Department of Transport spends two-thirds of its budget through Network Rail and Transport for London.
The chairwoman of PAC, Margaret Hodge, said:
It is unacceptable that Network Rail is still not fully transparent to Parliament or the taxpayer. The National Audit Office (NAO) must be allowed full audit access as quickly as possible to this organisation which is essentially kept afloat through public funds.
The Department of Transport could not offer any convincing evidence as to what characteristics Network Rail shares with a private company [and] international accounting conventions show that it should be considered as part of the public sector.
The report comes at a time when the Department for Transport is facing cuts of the degree in line with the rest of the public sector: its £12.8bn budget will be reduced by 15 per cent in real terms by 2014-15. Meanwhile, regulated rail fares will continue to be risen above inflation in 2013. The Campaign for Better Transport recently revealed the gross disparity between British rail costs and the travel of similar distances in other European countries: a comparable train season ticket, for example, can cost up to ten times more in the UK than on the continent.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


1 comment
It is well within the rights of anyone to make a complaint that they feel is worthy of discussion. What truly determines the conversational value of a topic is whether or not anyone responds to it. In essence, it is only my response (and future responses) that validate your words here projekty rodinnych domov. If no one reads and no one cares, then you might as well have been speaking to yourself.