How the Murdoch press keeps Australia’s dirty secret

News Corp papers across the world propagate the myth that prejudice has no effect on the lives of mo

The illegal eavesdropping on well-known people by the News of the World is said to be Rupert Murdoch's Watergate. But is it the crime by which Murdoch ought to be known? In his native land, Australia, Murdoch controls 70 per cent of the capital city press and the only national newspaper. Australia is the world's first murdochracy, in which smear by media is power.

The most enduring and insidious Murdoch campaign has been against the Aboriginal people, who were dispossessed by the arrival of the British in the late 18th century and have never been allowed to recover. "Nigger hunts" continued into the 1960s and beyond. The officially inspired theft of children from Aboriginal families, justified by the racist theories of the eugenics movement, produced those known as the Stolen Generation and in 1997 was identified as genocide. Today, the first Australians have the shortest life expectancy of any of the world's 90 indigenous peoples. Australia imprisons Aborigines at five times the rate South Africa jailed black people during the apartheid years. In the state of Western Australia, the figure is eight times the apartheid rate.

Return of the noble savage

Political power in Australia often rests in the control of resource-rich land. Most of the uran­ium, iron ore, gold, oil and natural gas is in Western Australia and the Northern Territory - on Aboriginal land. Indeed, Aboriginal "prog­ress" is all but defined by the mining industry and its political guardians in both Labor and coalition (conservative) governments. Their faithful, strident voice is the Murdoch press. The exceptional, reformist Labor government of Gough Whitlam in the 1970s set up a royal commission that made clear that social justice for Australia's first people would be achieved only with universal land rights and a share in the national wealth with dignity. In 1975, Whitlam was sacked by the governor general in a "constitutional coup". The Murdoch press had turned on the prime minister with such venom that rebellious journalists on the Australian burned their newspaper in the street.

In 1984, the Labor Party "solemnly pledged" to finish what Whitlam had begun and legislate Aboriginal land rights. This was opposed by the then Labor prime minister, Bob Hawke, a "mate" of Rupert Murdoch. Hawke blamed the public for being "less compassionate"; but a secret, 64-page report to the party showed that most Australians supported land rights. It was leaked to the Australian, whose front page declared, "Few support Aboriginal land rights", the opposite of the truth, thus feeding an atmosphere of self-fulfilling distrust, "backlash" and rejection of rights that might have distinguished Australia from South Africa.

In 1988, an editorial in Murdoch's Sun in London described "the Abos" as "treacherous and brutal". This was condemned by the UK Press Council as "unacceptably racist". The Australian publishes long articles that present Aboriginal people not unsympathetically but as perennial victims of each other, an "entire culture committing suicide", or as noble primitives requiring firm direction: the eugenicist's view. It promotes Aboriginal "leaders" who, by blaming their own people for their poverty, tell the white elite what it wants to hear. The writer Michael Brull parodied this: "O White man, please save us. Take away our rights because we are so backward."

This is also the government's view. In railing against what it called the "black armband view" of Australia's past, the conservative government of John Howard encouraged and absorbed the views of white supremacists - that there was no genocide, no Stolen Generation, no racism; indeed, white people are the victims of "liberal racism". A collection of far-right journalists, minor academics and hangers-on became the Antipodean equivalent of David Irving Holocaust deniers. Their platform has been the Murdoch press.

Land-grab

Andrew Bolt, columnist on Murdoch's Melbourne Herald Sun tabloid, is the defendant in a racial vilification case brought by nine prominent Aborigines, including Larissa Behrendt, a professor of law and indigenous studies in Sydney. Behrendt has been an authoritative and outspoken opponent of Howard's 2007 "emergency intervention" in the Northern Territory, which the Labor government of Julia Gillard has reinforced. The rationale to "intervene" was that child abuse among Aborigines was in "unthinkable numbers". This was a fraud. Out of 7,433 Aboriginal children examined by doctors, four possible cases were identified - about the rate of child abuse in white Australia. There is an old-fashioned colonial grab of mineral-rich land in the Northern Territory where Aboriginal land rights were granted in 1976.

The Murdoch press has been the most lurid and vociferous in promoting the "intervention", which a United Nations special rapporteur has condemned for its racial discrimination. Once again, Australian politicians are dispossessing the first inhabitants, demanding leasehold of land in return for health and education rights that white people take for granted and driving them into "economically viable hubs" where they will be effectively detained - a form of apartheid.

The despair and outrage of most Aboriginal people is not heard. For using her institutional voice and exposing the government's black supporters, Larissa Behrendt has been subjected to a vicious campaign of innuendo in the Murdoch press, including the implication that she is not a "real" Aborigine. Deploying the language of its soulmate the Sun, the Australian derides the "abstract debate" of "land rights, apologies, treaties" as a "moralising mumbo-jumbo spreading like a virus". The aim is to silence those who dare tell Australia's dirty secret.

61 comments

smeee innit's picture

For every Murdoch there's a Pilger. Unfortunately though Murdoch's empire is an amoral, money grubbing plutocracy and Pilger a disenfranchised journalist. The longer governments around the world defer acting to regulate Murdoch the more powerful he gets and the more difficult the job of regulation becomes. It seems the only chance we might get would be with the democratisation of the media, but how could that happen? Even the ubiquitous Internet is under attack by self interested media multi-nationals, who see net neutrality as a barrier to make even more money from tiered services. In the meantime thank you John Pilger for tireless investigation, naming and shaming.

Livers's picture

Why do I find myself day-dreaming of the day the odious Murdoch is no more?

Thomas Devine's picture

You European slam both Australians and Americans, but if we came back to Europe, you'd sceam in horror. Don't speak of giving the land back to the Natives, any natives, until you're ready to make a home in Europe (and your corner of Europe) for all the Americans, Australians, Canadians, and New Zealanders, And as good or better a home than what they've got. You talk big, but you don't even compensate those Europeans next door to you, whom you've burtally oppressed, for that oppression. And one hears more nasty cracks about the Irish and the Welsh in England than one ever hears about Native Americans, Native Australians, Native Canadians, or the Maori.

Pilger at least has the right to speak. The rest of you are total hypocrits!

jenny's picture

WOG = western oriental gentleman; how did it become an insult ?

Ewen's picture

For Those condemning every white Australian as a Murdoch Citizen, is every American Donald Trump, is every Brit the Queen?

Tarring all with the same brush is exactly the crux of this problem. J' accuse.

Tom's picture

I know it's almost a national sport to have a go at Pilger on practically anything he does. Despite that, how specifically have things improved for Aborignal people in Australia say in the past ten years?

Not too long ago, Kevin Rudd did his famous Apology speech. In some ways, it was a first step. In others however, how has it then been backed up with concrete steps to improve the situation? What's the standard of living like for the average Australian vs. native person?

A quick comparison. 47 years ago, segregation was legal in the States. Despite the Civil Rights Act, what's it like now?

Unemployment for Native Americans and other people of color is at astronomical highs.

Do the Democrats have an actual job creation bill? No. Do the Republicans? No. Will any Presidential candidate spend more than ten minutes on a Native reservation? No.

It's easy for many Australians to say back off mate. We're not racist. We're the most tolerant society on earth. If that's true, then why do you still have the huge gap between the haves and the have nots? Now, please don't pull out the standard if Tony Abbott and Joe Hockey were in charge instead of Guillard and Wayne Swan, things would be much better with more tax cuts. Nice try, but no.

Neil's picture

I spent some time in Australia a few years back and I'd agree about the casual racism/xenophobic attitude.
While I was there, I met up with my mother's cousin who had emigrated to Australia in the early sixties. Despite living in Australia for forty years, he had never met an aboriginal though this did not stop him having a pretty dim view of them. We visited Darwin together and he had the chance to meet some aboriginals. His four-decade-media-tainted-veil was instantly lifted and he saw them as the intelligent, dignified and respectful people they really are.
The mistake white Australia makes is to assume they wish to swap their ancient nomadic traditions for a settled urban lifestyle. They just want to live gentle, sustainable lives in tune with the land and unhindered by outsiders. We can learn much from them.

For a more detailed analysis of John Pilger's Australia it's worth reading his 'A Secret Country'.

Thomas Devine's picture

The Native Americans got more respect even in the 19th century. And if you look at who owns Alaska, largely decided in the 1920-1940 period, native land rights finally got some respect. Most of the arguement now is in new contexts and has more to do with poverty than racism (not that racism is gone). In most ways, the USA has moved farther along toward justice for Native Americans and African-Americans, than Australia has for Native Australians or the UK has for the Working-Class, the Irish, the Scots, the Welsh, or the people of Northern England.

And yet ritual hate of America is the joy of your life.

skiptonman's picture

Great article again, but beyond belief that a national paper can lie as the Australian did in 84 along with it`s president Bob Hawke who was in bed with Murdoch .. to say the complete opposite about the aboriginal`s public support was crimminal. Just as shocking is "Australia imprisons Aborigines at five times the rate South Africa jailed black people during the apartheid years." imperalism still going strong throughout the world, all indigenous people of the world have been robbed of their wealth and dignity for profit .. we all should hold our heads in shame because it`s not stopping anytime soon , why can`t our voted leaders do something ? perhaps they don`t know !!! or hands are tied by big corparations who threaten and bully with there huge bank balances .. keep it up John , maybe a politican will read your article ..

chipperfield's picture

Noel Pearson in The Australian continues to remind us of the right of Aboriginal children to hold on to their ancestral mother tongue, and what he is doing in Cape York to make this happen.

Latest tweets