Julia Gillard, the new warlord of Oz
The rise to power of Australia’s first female prime minister led to hopes for political change. But
By John Pilger Published 22 July 2010
The Order of Mates celebrated beside Sydney Harbour the other day. This is a venerable masonry in Australian political life that unites the Labor Party with the rich elite known as the big end of town. They shake hands, not hug, though the Silver Bodgie now hugs. In his prime, the Silver Bodgie, aka Bob Hawke, or Hawkie, wore suits that shone, wide-bottomed trousers and shirts with the buttons undone. A bodgie was a 1950s Australian Teddy Boy and Hawke's thick grey-black coiffure added inches to his abbreviated stature.
Hawke also talked out of the corner of his mouth in an accent that was said to be "ocker", or working class, although he was of the middle class and Oxford-educated. When he was president of the Australian Council of Trade Unions, his popularity rested on his reputation as a hard-drinking larrikin, an Australian sobriquet once prized almost as much as an imperial honour. For Hawke, it was the disguise of one whose heart belonged to the big end of town, who cooled the struggles of working Australians during the rise to power of the new property sharks, mineral barons and tax avoiders.
Indeed, as Labor prime minister in the 1980s, Hawke and his treasurer Paul Keating eliminated the most equitable spread of personal income on earth: a model for the Blairites. And the Great Mate across the Pacific loved Hawkie. Victor Marchetti, the CIA strategist who helped draft the treaty that gave America control over its most important spy base in the southern hemisphere, told me: "When Hawke came along . . . he immediately sent signals that he knew how the game was played and who was buttering his bread. He became very co-operative, and even obsequious."
After the coup, capitulation
The party overlooking Sydney Harbour on 12 July was to launch a book by Hawke's wife, Blanche d'Alpuget, whose effusions about the Silver Bodgie include his single-handed rescue of Nelson Mandela from apartheid's clutches. A highlight of the occasion was the arrival of the new prime minister, Julia Gillard, who proclaimed Hawke her "role model" and the "gold standard" for running Australia.
This may help explain the extraordinary and brutal rise of Gillard. In 48 hours in June, she and Mates in the party's caucus got rid of the elected prime minister, Kevin Rudd. Her weapons were Rudd's slide in the opinion polls and the power and prize of Australia's vast trove of minerals. To pay off the national debt, Rudd had decreed a modest special tax on the profits of giants such as BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. The response was a vicious advertising campaign against the government and a threat to shut down mines.
Within days of her coup, Gillard, who was Rudd's deputy, had reduced the new tax and the companies' campaign was called off. It was a repeat of Hawke's capitulation to the mining companies in the 1980s when they threatened to bring down a state Labor government in Western Australia. Like her predecessors, Gillard is complicit in a land-grab of the one region of Australia, the Northern Territory, where Aboriginal Australians have land and mineral rights. The deceit is spectacular and historical. The government claims it is "protecting" black Australian children from "abuse" and "neglect" within their own communities. Official statistics show that the incidence of child abuse is no different from that of white Australia and the true cause of Aboriginal suffering is a systemic colonial racism that denies housing, water, roads, adequate health care and schools to indigenous people, and which harasses and imprisons them at a greater rate than in South Africa under apartheid.
Since her coup, Gillard has reaffirmed this racism at the heart of policymaking. Australia takes fewer refugees than almost any other country, yet Gillard is using their "threat" to outdo the hysterics of an especially primitive opposition. Gillard's "hard line" on refugees has been welcomed by the openly racist former MP Pauline Hanson as "sweep[ing] political correctness from the debate". Hanson's One Nation is the equivalent of the British National Party. Gillard, an immigrant from Wales, demanded that refugees heading for Australia be "processed" (dumped) in East Timor, an impoverished country whose genocidal occupation by Indonesia was backed by Australian governments. Now liberated, the East Timorese have read their huge, underpopulated neighbour a moral lesson by saying no.
High risers
Many of the refugees come from Afghanistan, which Australia invaded at Washington's insistence. "Our national security is at stake in Afghanistan," said Gillard on 5 July, linking a faraway tribal war and resistance to foreign invaders with three terrorist attacks in Indonesia in which Australians were killed. There is not a shred of evidence to support her statement. Australia's security is unique; since 1915, an estimated 22 people have died as a result of politically motivated violence.
The new prime minister's partner is a former hair products salesman named Tim Mathieson. This would be of no interest, had he not been given the job of "Australia's men's health ambassador" by one of Gillard's colleagues, the health minister, even though he had no experience in health care. Mathieson is now a "rising star" in real estate, thanks to one Albert Dadon, whose company is seeking planning permission for a contentious high-rise in Melbourne. Dadon is a Mate. As head of the Australia Israel Cultural Exchange, he arranges admiring tours of Israel for politicians and journalists. Gillard went on such a junket last year in the wake of Israel's massacre of 1,400 people in Gaza, mostly women and children. She who would be the first female prime minister of Australia drooled her uncritical support for their killers.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


50 comments
Many of the points above are valid, but I don't think its helpful to jumble many issues together with a tabloid level of rigour. Rudd's proposed mining tax was his last chance after the failure of his promised ETS led to a sharp dip in the polls. The big mining companies (with their ex-ALP staff) KNEW they could get him removed by pushing back. The ALP powerbrokers knew Gillard would play the game and that included firmer commitment to the war in Afghanistan. The ALP always has been for capitalism, imperialism, Zionism etc and that is why they can win elections. Most Australians would have no idea about whats happening with the Intervention or the war (or politics), the challenge is to engage with them in a positive problem solving manner instead of moralising and focusing on individuals
No one has to prove a conspiracy, only to provoke suspicion. No one is honest, everyone is lying. But at the end of the day Australian politics will always be a choice between Libs and Labor. Brutus Gillard or an evil weasel. Gillard has to take the job because the alternative is too awful to consider.
What democratic societies should learn lessen from Australia election 2010:
1. What voters crying for reforms not just parliament, but for all department?
Voter’s pains did not link to high income Politicians and Bureaucracy.
The Australia historical hung parliament demonstrated the big gap of inequality society between the small educated elite groups who get highest pay by talk feast used mouth work controlling live essential resources of the country in every social platforms against the biggest less educated groups who get lowest pay by hands work squeezed by discriminative policies that sucking live blood from individual poor/less wealth off?
Voters’ voices do not hear?
Voters’ pains do not ease?
Voters’ cries do not care?
Voter is crying for department reforms over 70 years that resulting a 2010 Hung Parliament?
An iceberg example of voter’s crying:
“……it seem to me there was an unfair to treat me when the merit of “Claim for Disability Support Pension or Sickness Allowance” form in detail clearly defy 15 hours classify the cut off point for acceptance, when comparing to my early assessment completed in June this year that it has the merit less than 8 hours (0-7) work capacity due to my long term medical impairment since an injury occurred in 2005”…….
It was disappointing where the push of Parliament reform that mainly to brink good news to all MPs by the individual MPs during this year historical hung parliament in 70 years, and the reform did not including all Government Departments where it would directly brink good actions to all voters/or people?
Ma kee wai
(Member of Inventor Association Queensland since 1993)
There is absolutely no evidence that the mining companies "knew" that they could "get" PM Kevin Rudd removed from power. This is an absurd statement.
The mining industry in Australia is divided into the giant mining companies and the lesser ones. The big miners have been placated by a deal brokered by the new replacement PM Julia Gillard. However the more minor miners are still very bolshy and are throwing their weight behind the opposition, hence giving the lie to the risible claim by Darren.
The Labor Party's strategists found out very quickly the clout that the big miners could wield by dipping into their virtually bottomless pit to fund anti-Labor ads.
The miners' explicitly stated intent was to back the Liberal-National Coalition Opposition - I do not think for a moment that they expected, much less engineered one way or another an internal ALP coup. Where is the evidence of this ludicrous claim? The move against Rudd caught everyone by surprise - the media, the Opposition and members of the Labor Party, as well as the punters. In that it was very well executed coup.
The reason why it worked, as I said in my prior post, was that there was a general dissatisfaction with Rudd for his unilateralism and unwillingness to work cooperatively with his cabinet and colleagues. The stoush with the miners merely added fuel to the fire. It must be remembered that current PM Julia Gillard, the beneficiary of the coup, and Treasurer Wayne Swan as part of the Gang of Four kitchen cabinet who made all the decisions, were also up to their necks in the formulation of the new mining super profits tax.
I will say this again, Rudd's high-handedness and rudeness was hated internally but tolerated while he was popular, but the marriage of convenience fell apart the moment it became evident that his name was mud out in the marginal electorates, many of which were vulnerable to well-funded propaganda because they were rural electorates where mining occurred in Queensland and Western Australia. The parliamentary Labor Party given the opportunity to oust him did not need any ukase from the mining lobby. That suggestion is just insulting to the average intelligence.
The other suggestion is just as riddled with falsehoods. The ALP has NOT ALWAYS been a booster for Israel. It is true that the Israel lobby managed to get to Bob Hawke, the trades union head and later PM when he needed their help via the good offices of the transport magnate Peter Abeles, a prominent Jew who facilitated the breaking of the pilots' union who in turn threatened the historic union-government accord to break the cycle of wage inflation that was the set piece of Hawke government's policy. (This is a separate and complex story which would take as away from the gist of this post, so I'll leave it for another time.)
But only some parts of the ALP assumed a warm relationship with Israel. Other factions of the ALP remained either neutral or even overtly hostile to it.
The Labor Party has had its ups and downs with Israel and its lobbies, recall the virulent anti-Israel left-wing Victorian Socialist Left faction leader and State Secretary Bill Hartley who was an active proselytiser for Iraq and Libya as well as the PLO; interstingly, Hartley's actions of sourcing funds for the government to fund its buyout of mining interests by going cap in hand to Saddam Hussein's Baath Party in 1975, were intrumental in bringing down the Whitlam ALP government. ALP had been out of power from 1949 until 1972 until Whitlam came along, Hartley helped to bury it until Bob Hawke came along in 1983. With friends like these...
It must be noted that the Coalition is an even stronger supporter of Israel and its policies than the ALP is: it was an Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce lunch this week which featured addresses by the leader of the Opposition Tony Abbott and his warm-up man, the one-time treasurer in the Howard government ousted at the last election, Peter Costello, who, in support of Abbott and the Coalition used his address to viciously mock the current PM Julia Gillard, including a bizarre burlesque impersonation of her accent. There's gratitude for you - we remove a PM for you and you still poo on us form a great height...
The sentence that the "ALP always has been for capitalism, imperialism, Zionism" is just a period piece, a Leninist-style agit-prop and nothing more.
Lenin once characterised the ALP as a "liberal capitalist" party - it now makes no more sense than Zinoviev's pamphlet of the time about the West's labor movements in general: "They sell their birthright for a mess of pottage...They retard the erection of a new order in society which will of necessity free them, the 'aristocrats' themselves, from wage slavery. They become a tool of reaction."
I reckon we are over the New Order now, thank you very much, just as we are over the empty phrases of rote-learned propaganda. Unless one lives in N Korea that is...
murdochs media mogals are herting this lab pm badly .
I was lucky...I could see the writing on the wall when Hawke finally gave way to Keating and I got the hell out of Australia before Howard and then the recent rash of political clones and drones took over the Australian political landscape.
While Pilger can jar with his (sometime) holier than thou sermonising, I would rather live in his world than the sanctimonious, xenophobic, jingoistic, and smugly anti-intellectual society Australia has increasingly become.
Regardless of their position on the political spectrum the days of giants and visionaries such as Whitlam and Fraser have sadly passed.
Fraser said it best when he finally broke with the Liberals stating they were no longer liberal and had become just another conservative party.
The ALP is, as always, a faction riven collection of shallow, sneering, venal political queans who sold their collective soul during the Hawke and Keating years.
And when Australia finally elected, in Rudd, a man with an intellectual and global vision (even though I am opposed to his moral and religious views the man stood apart from his brawling contemporaries) what happens? The small and pernicious 'backroom' political hacks stab their own in the back once more.
From afar one wonders whether it is a case of Australia being led blithely into the abyss by a populist and hackneyed political class of scavengers or whether the Australian electorate is truly represented by these hollow and self serving political swine?
Perhaps its is simply the case of Australia getting the leadership they deserve? The 'lucky country' no more.
I have read John Pilger for 25 years or more, and have much admiration for what he does. I agreed with a lot of what he said about the contemporary Australian political situation with Gillard. I do think he understimates the importance of an Australian sustainable population. Water shortages, lack of infrastructure investment, traffic congestion, homelessness, and absurdly inflated rent and mortgage rates in relation to wages are making cities like Melbourne less and less pleasant to be in.
Antony Loewenstein (Independent Australian Jewish Voices and author of "My Israel Question") simply posits Israel Lobby disaffection as a factor of uncertain magnitude in Rudd's demise. I personally suppose that the slump in Rudd's popularity was the key factor i.e. it was a pro-Zionist-led Coup and not a Zionist Coup. Of course the inevitable pro-Zionist assertion of "anti-Semitism" re anti-racist criticism of the Israel Lobby is utterly false and extremely ugly and obnoxious when implied against an eminent anti-racist Jewish writer.
The pro-Zionist Australian Rudd-Gillard and Gillard Labor Governments have failed to demand extradition and trial of those Israelis (including Israeli Australians) involved in the violent terrorist attack on Australians in international waters and in violation of Australia's sovereignty through passport forgery.
Decent Australians will have a poor opinion of pro-Zionist Labor's cowardly dereliction of duty and of the disloyalty to Australia of the Australian Israel Lobby. As an anti-racist humanitarian, my view is that supporters of the racist Zionists running genocidal, war criminal, nuclear terrorist Apartheid Israel should be sidelined in public life, as have been those supporting racist groups such as the Nazis, neo-Nazis, Apartheiders and KKK.
A multi-author compendium about the ongoing Palestinian Genocide by Apartheid Israel has recently been published in London (John Pilger is one of many distinguished contributors): "The Plight of the Palestinians. A Long History of Destruction", edited by Professor William A. Cook (Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2010).
brian o , Chagos Islanders were taken to those islands as slaves in all but name and made to run platation farms. Those farms destroied the ecosystems of the island. No blame to the Chagos Islanders, they're victims. The UK realised that they neither had the cash or the desire to feed the Chagos people, who were running out of food and water, so they took them to the nearest colony and dumped them. The only good thing about that is that the Chagosians didn't strave.
Pilger wants to put the Chagosians back on the Chagos islands to humiliate the UK and the US. The probable fates of the Chagosians means nothing to him, he is a hypocrite!
If you cared about the Chagosians, you've press for their being sent to either the Uk, were they'd have a chance at a good life, or the USA, were they'd have a better chance at a good life!
But for four thousand people without a viable way to make a living (please spare me the fantasy banana plantations, they would fail) the islands are a death trap.
Pilger needs to clam down and ask what he want to achieve, not who he wants to slam!
In his book "Collapse" Jared Diamond suggests that a population of 8 million or so would be realistically able to live sustainably, yet the population is now around 20 million and growing.