Leader: Pakistan — the laboratory for world destruction
By Staff blogger Published 19 August 2010
Ban Ki-moon, the United Nations secretary general, said on a recent trip to Pakistan to visit flood-ravaged towns and villages: ''In the past, I have witnessed many natural disasters around the world, but nothing like this." Despite the relatively few deaths so far (in comparison to January's Haiti earthquake, for example), the UN estimates that 14 million people have been affected by the floods: more than were harmed by the 2005 Kashmir earthquake, the 2004 Asian tsunami and the Haiti earthquake put together.
The floods have dominated headlines across the world in recent weeks, but this special issue of the magazine had been scheduled long before they struck. Why? Pakistan matters. It is the world's second most populous Muslim country and is considered by the west to be the front line of the so-called war on terror. It is a nuclear-armed power that has gone to war four times with neighbouring India, and its armed forces are mired in a long, bloody struggle with Islamist insurgents on its border with war-torn Afghanistan. In 2009, a record 3,021 people died in terrorist attacks across Pakistan. So disturbed is the country that no cricket team will tour there.
Yet, amid all this, astonishingly, as William Dalrymple writes (on page 26): "The army continues to obsess about India." Polls show the public shares this obsession -- in a Pew Global Attitudes survey in July, 53 per cent of Pakistanis cited India as the greatest threat to their security, compared to 23 per cent for the Taliban and just 3 per cent for al-Qaeda.
Meanwhile, as the recent WikiLeaks war logs revealed, Pakistan's military intelligence service, the notorious ISI, continues to collude with the Taliban in a duplicitous state of affairs that was rightly denounced by David Cameron. The British mission in Afghanistan is imperilled by Pakistan's double game. So, too, is our security at home: British officials claim that three out of four terror plots discovered here in recent years can be traced back to camps in that country.
Pakistan -- flooded, bombed, bloodied, broke -- continues to teeter on the edge, some reports suggesting that the military is poised to return to power in yet another coup. Founded as a democratic nation, Pakistan has been ruled by military dictators for 33 of the 63 years that have passed since its creation in 1947. The country languishes at 141st out of 182 countries on the UN's Human Development Index. It stands at 139th out of the 180 countries on Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index.
Indeed it is, above all else, the venal corruption of the Pakistani ruling classes that continues to blight this once-proud nation -- and fuel the destabilising rise of radical Islam. The former cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan, in his interview on page 30, refers to the "collective political mafia" in Pakistan, which views politics as a "business". We hope Mr Khan is correct in his belief that there is a "general movement for change" inside the country, based around a free press, an independent judiciary and an idealistic younger generation.
But it will be up to the Pakistani elite ultimately to realise that the greatest threat that the Islamists and jihadists pose is to the very survival of Pakistan. At present, the liberal, secular, democratic Pakistan conceived by its founder, Muhammad Ali Jinnah (profiled by Akbar Ahmed on page 34), is very much a lost ideal.
Karl Kraus, the great satirist, once called fin-de-siècle imperial Vienna "the research laboratory for world destruction", because the most dangerous currents of his age flowed through the city. It is something similar with Pakistan today, which can stake a claim to being the world's most dangerous country.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

8 comments
Yes, things are not rosy in my country of birth and it hurts. Only the timing is not right. There are millions of homeless people and nobody can turn the clock back for the next few years. Otherwise rule of law follows the long period of dictatorships and only when democracy stabilizes, thing s will get from bad to worse. If it is not the army and other players trying to upset the setup with weak and powerless leaders, justice gets in the picture. Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry questioned the sovereignty of parliament and asked if it is acceptable “if tomorrow parliament declares secularism, and not Islam, as the state polity”. This question, coming from the highest adjudicator, should certainly ring alarm bells for those who wish to see Pakistan progress into a secular, democratic country.
Yes, alarm bells are in order. But I assure you the voice will not get to those who matter. And Imran Khan is the wrong person to save Pakistan; he is on record for supporting Taliban and believes hat women should stay at home and not work.
I meant: 'and unless democracy stabilizes, things will get from bad to worse.'
Sorry
When the majority of Pakistanis feel India is the major threat and only a quarter feels that the problem belongs to Taliban, what more can be said about the inferiority complex and feelings Pakistanis have to live with every day. As far as India is concerned, there are sections of society which feels that way (and rightfully so given the terrorist attacks in India and elsewhere), but the country has progressed nonetheless which can not be said about Pakistan.
In the middle of the crisis of such extra-ordinary magnitude, part of the Pakistan army is busy shelling across the line of control in Kashmir to provide cover for the terrorists to enter Kashmir. If this is their priority only God can help them !
The main gist of the article is that Pakistan teeters on the edge and any ensuing chaos would be calamitous for the region. Obvious statement. Yes, true. We get it. But nestled insidiously in the 4th paragraph is a message that contradicts every strain of the NS stance to date on Nato's presence in Afghanistan and the "Af-Pak" issue.
Having previously been told that our presence there is causing more harm than good and that terror threats here arise because of our presence there and not in spite of it, the NS shrilly cries that our noble mission is "imperilled" and that Dave's blundering diplomacy a few weeks ago was bang on!
So let's get a couple of things straight, NS. If Pakistan is playing a duplicitous game (and it probably is), it is only obeying the most fundamental laws of geopolitics. Afghanistan is its back yard and it is responding to the primary crime of our presence there and its response, while not helpful to overall stability, is the secondary crime. How can we possibly expect it to allow power to shift unchallenged towards the West (which is not really its ally) and therefore, by association, to India. Secondly, there may be some LINK between terror plots here and camps there but it is just that - a link not a cause. The CAUSE, is once again, the anger generated by our presence there.
I am bemused and disappointed by this paragraph. It looked like a cut-and-paste from The Spectator. Dear NS, wtf?
Pakistan is everything a modern state should not be. It is based on Islamic fascism. In 1971 the Pak army committed one of the worst Genocides in recent times when it killed 3 million Bengalis mostly Hindus. The Hamidor Rehman report revealed that Pak army had issued expressed orders for ethnic cleansing of Hindus from Pakistan. In later years Pakistan degenerated into a terrorist haven - with no less than 130 Islamic terror outfits. The world body needs to force Pakistan to close all madrassas and pressurize Pakistan to deIslamize.
Populatins, sepcially the less educated ones, tend to have spectres of death and danger imprinted on their minds as the result of certain events and attitudes and these are generationally transmitted. Pakistan has India (they traditionally feared India might cut off their water sources - all 5 rivers flow from the Indian side of the border). India, too, hates not just Pakistan but the Pakistanis. I was shocked on a recent visit to see how much. It's not much different Britain - ask the average Brit what percentage of our population is Asian and they'll tell you 30 - 40%. It's actually 3%. The revenge of the former colonies is their spectre. and spectres tend to magnify as time goes.
I find the content of the editorial fair and informative but I am shocked by the title - in this disastrous time of suffering and loss for Pakistan - could we not have let this comment pass?
Post new comment