Return to: Home | World Affairs | Asia

Texts, lies and Zardari-gate

Fatima Bhutto

Published 30 October 2008

Pakistan is in crisis, with an economy that has hit rock bottom. Think Zimbabwe, minus the good governance

Texts, lies and Zardari-gate

Is Pakistan a failed state? No, but it's damned lousy at pretending it's a democracy.

The country's newly elected government, the first in the world headed by two former convicts (between them the president and prime minister have served time on charges of corruption, narcotics, extortion and murder, no less) was heralded into power by a barrage of praise and congratulations by the Labour Party - David Miliband is a huge fan - and the Republicans waiting out their term across the pond. However, eight months into the new government's post-Musharraf rule, Pakistan's economy, sovereignty and freedoms have been considerably eroded. Think Zimbabwe, minus the good governance.

The nation's economy, debt laden and mired in a never-ending spiral of inflation, has hit rock bottom. President Zardari's recent trip to China, eager friends of the strategic nuclear armed nation, was the latest blow to the country's economy. China offered no bail-outs, no friendly cash donations, nothing. The government, desperate, formed a "Friends of Pakistan" forum through which they asked other nations to step in and help out with the financial meltdown hitting the country. No one volunteered, not even the Saudis.

Food inflation has hit record highs, with the price of sugar rising close to 150 per cent this year. The same goes for other staples - flour and wheat especially. Electricity in much of the southern Sindh province, from which the ruling Pakistan People's Party - since renamed the Permanent Plunder Party - draws its strength, has been cut off. Prices were raised 71 per cent in one day by the chairman of the Karachi Electric Supply Company before being lowered after protests.

Traders in the commercial capital have been on the streets for much of the month, threatening the government with the non-payment of their bills, and why should they pay? On average, one spends more time in darkness than light in Karachi. Electricity whirs on and off five or six times a day - hospitals, homes, and businesses rely largely on private generators.

The Karachi Stock Exchange, wise to the gig, has placed a floor on the bourse since late August - stocks can't trade below the prices set in the summer. The move, which flies in the face of basic economic theory, instituted a capital control on investors. Your money is stuck. Foreign investors can't flee - though they'd quite like to and will as soon as the floor is lifted. And the credibility of Pakistani equity markets is shot. It would be prudent to note that collapse is fairly imminent.

Pakistan remains a rich and diverse country held hostage to a government chock full of ill-equipped and unqualified carpetbaggers

On the war-on-terror front, Pakistan's new government is proving to be a most gracious ally. The country's borders have been opened to unmanned drones that fly over parts of Pakistan's Northwest Frontier province when and as they please, hitting various targets. Some are meant to be al-Qaeda bullseyes, some are reported to be Taliban strongholds, and some are just schools. On 24 October US-led strikes in North Waziristan killed seven students of a seminary school.

Pakistan, 61 years young, is a new country. It is a sovereign and independent nation, or used to be. The new government has huffed here and there about being left out of the decision-making process that sends planes over the country, but no borders have been shut and no serious attempts made to halt US aerial infringement of Pakistan's skies. All that's been created is an internal refugee problem. With the foreign bombings in Waziristan and the civil war in the Swat valley being fought by local insurgents against the state, the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre puts the number of internally displaced in Pakistan at close to one million people, Asia's largest current displacement. With the US elections close at hand, it's anyone's guess which way the tide will turn. But I'd put my money on worse.

Politically, this government has managed a most inglorious feat - it makes the unimaginable possible and past dictatorships look lightweight. Since taking office in February of this year, the PPP has continually reneged on its promise to reinstate the country's former chief justice, Iftikhar Chaudhry, who was unceremoniously unseated from the Supreme Court in 2007 by General Musharraf. They have invited the former judge to join politics if he wishes, but have suggested he quit his day job.

Worse still, press freedoms have been whittled down to the point of the farcical. Pakistanis have turned to text messages and emails to criticise the government - it's nothing grand - satirical texts and jokes mainly - but the government responded with characteristic aplomb. The cyber-terrorism wing of the Federal Investigation Authority has been tasked with hunting down the "anti-democratic" forces that seek to discredit or "character assassinate" the country's politicians. In democratic Pakistan, even text messages have become treasonous.

So, no, Pakistan is not a failed state. It's the country's leaders that are failures. In the 21st century, Pakistan remains a rich and diverse country held hostage to a government chock full of ill-equipped and unqualified carpetbaggers.

This year alone, the government has recycled three men as ministers of finance. With the war on terror escalating and Taliban-style militants gaining power in the northern reaches, Pakistan cannot afford any more failures. Try texting that to the government, though.

Fatima Bhutto will be writing regularly for the New Statesman

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

37 comments from readers

proudlyleft
30 October 2008 at 12:35

So what's new about this government? I cannot recall any government in Pakistan -- apart from perhaps a few initial years -- doing anything different in kind. It has merely been a difference of degree. And if that does not make Pakistan a failed state, I don't know what does. But then, perhaps Ms Bhutto's hardy optimism stems from a comparison of Pakistan to Afghanistan... The fact remains -- and Hindu nationalists in India will discover it too -- that religion never helps run a state. Pakistan will start failing less the day it realises that the notion of an ISLAMIC state was a biiiig mistake.

Imran Siddiqui
30 October 2008 at 15:40

Excellent article, specially the new term 'Permanent Plunder Party'.

I hope Musharraf does come back through political process and this nightmare ends soon.

sameerrehman
30 October 2008 at 16:21

Fantastic read, sums up the current grotesuqe leadership of ppp, which is worst than the so called dictorship of Musharraf. Pakistan by no means is a failed state it has a lot of potential, talent only needs a correct leader to Channelize. Young people need to enter politics, as we need new leaders not these tried and tested "unqualified carpetbaggers"

Salman
30 October 2008 at 16:26

Why are we accepting anything which is shoved down our throats by these incompetent bureacrats, generals and politicians. These people are going to jump ship anytime they smell any personal danger for them, leaving poor masses to pick up the pieces of whatever will be left of Pakistan. But again, why are'nt the masses sensing it. Why dont they complain. Why are we waiting for food to rain down from heaven. Why ?

Paul Lettan
30 October 2008 at 16:49

What a welcome addition to this parish! I look forward to Fatima Bhutto's further contributions.

writeon
30 October 2008 at 20:37

The West should stop pursuing policies which are undermining Pakistan. The occupation of Afghanistan and the war is the stupidest strategy imaginable. It is destablizing the entire region. There is great potential for disater here, especially if the Americans decide to escalate the war in Afghanistan and attack northern Pakistan as well. As most of the supplies for our army in Afghanistan come up through Pakistan, this American, Afghan, 'surge' seems highly problematic and very risky indeed.

Is pursuing policies and military strategies that seem so counter-productive, reckless, and are clearly destabilizing Pakistan really sensible?

The UK and the rest of Europe should break with the Americans and withdraw from Afghanistan before it's too late.

sweety
31 October 2008 at 01:52

Oh my god yet another lost soul turns up on our shores looking for justice, and a chance to cock a snook at their birth place! Whatever happens you folks always seem to have the money to lead the good life in Kensington, Burj Dubai or wherever. No country has ever given away land to the Chinese for nothing, before, tell us about this!

masum
31 October 2008 at 02:48

Well said, Fatima. It nice to see some reporting from the inside while Western powers sit idly by and capitalize on photo opps with Zardari. For another riveting and informative piece by Fatima, please see http://www.imow.org/wpp/stories/viewStory?storyId=1706

gnuneo
31 October 2008 at 03:10

welcome Fatima, i look forward to more such high quality pieces from your pen.

such a terrifying picture from one of the World's Nuclear Powers - yet apparently some infantile prank by an overpaid buffoon in the British media is more important. Anyway, nevermind on that, the UK has its own political problems.

i would like to know what you would suggest could help the situation over there? What local solutions do you think could help, what changes in international policy, what can *we* do so far away to help influence this towards a good solution?

"Permanent Plunder Party" - hey, we have the same Party! (Although ours has two names, either the conliblabs, or the labconlibs, depending on personal preference).

umair
31 October 2008 at 05:15

great article Fatima ! but the media curbs thingy .. is i really dont thinkso !! oh they getting the deserving humiliation these Plunders party!! shame on us that we have the greatest mr. ten ever as our president TODAY !! and painfully clue/brain/shame/less cabinet of his !

clifton70
31 October 2008 at 06:03

Excellent , I think this will encourage the young people of Pakistan to come forward and speak loudly against such corrupt statesmen and to join hand to save this nation.

13 moons
31 October 2008 at 10:51

so what would fatima do different? does she have a plan for pakistan? would it be possible for her administration to refuse multi-billion dollar contracts, deals, loans [bribes], ignore big business that seems to corrupt every one of our leaders and work toward the needs of the poor and helpless people of this country?? benazir while in opposition wrote articles to this effect, so did the nawaz camp - in fact all opposition rhetoric sounds the same. . the question is how would you act once in power?

we all know what this country needs:

1] withdraw support for the USA's ridiculous WAR on TERROR

2] DEFAULT at once and refuse help from IMF or WB

3] then seek help from china, saudi, iran etc.

4] expose the 'manufactured islamic militants, terrorists, funsamentalists' funded by the US, INDIA, AFGHANISTAN and RUSSIA

5] help the afghan taliban represent their struggle as a fight against imperialism and western domination instead of the jihad it is made out to look like

6] ban imports that hurt local industry, ban foreign banks and oil companies that hurt pakistani people and interests, close all doors until we can get our house in order

7] further develop pakistan as a modern muslim state and promote nationalism, pride, dignity and honor

8] reform the elite feudal colonial system that we borrowed from the brits to inculcate a true concern for each and every pakistani - there is no question that we can totally eliminate poverty and hunger if all pakistani's were required to donate by law

9] we MUST take care of our own, by any means necessary, even if that means the elite will have to part with their millions

10] if this sounds too extreme it means we are too comfy living in a society driven by self-motive and that we have no concern for the 97% of our people living below the poverty line - no one else can help them, only we can

Chris
31 October 2008 at 11:12

Thank you Fatima for your clear voice from inside the

country. This is very refreshing and revealing after so

much hypocrisy from western leaders and much

surface skating western journalism.

Hammad
31 October 2008 at 17:37

While i agree with your war on terror, economic and judicial points. Though, your media claim is rather unjustified. Going through the daily newspapers does not really substantiate your claim. If plans of curbing the media are cooking up behind the scene then i have no idea about it.

Honestly, i Pakistan is not like 'Zimbabwe minus good governance.' Its a great complement to Mugabe. (Official inflation of 2.3 million percent, while unofficial figures go much higher).

Hammad ul Haq

vajood.com

Tania Harrison
31 October 2008 at 23:52

The disgraceful Pakistani state of affairs today is the consequences of a state created out of the hate of the other (infidel). Pakistan now is a state simply beyond redemption. No point for us in the West to pour money into this ungrateful bottomless pit.

Riaz Ahmad
01 November 2008 at 01:42

Pakistan through out is short history has been ruled by politicians who put the mafia to shame. To add insult to injury, the people of Pakistan keep voting the same old crooks in to office again and again. Corruption has entered the nook and crany of the country's affairs and culture, honesty and transperency is something totally abnormal and out of place in Pakistan.

writeon
01 November 2008 at 09:43

Creating viable nation states is, historically - if one just looks at Europe - a long, exspensive, bloody and extremely difficult task. There's no reason to believe Pakistan differs from this pattern.

I agree with 13moons ten things to do in Pakistan, but I don't really see how they can be achieved without the kind of 'bourgeois revolution' that characterized the move from fuedalism to the modern state in Europe.

To impliment radical change in Pakistan will require the bourgeoise forming an historic alliance with the 'peasantry' against the power of the 'aristocracy' who really rule. This won't be easy or occurr overnight, but it is inevitable.

On the other hand one could imagine a far quicker and sharper process where 'radical' and 'progressive' elements, a group of young and non-corrupt officers in the Pakistani military simply take power and establish a form of national, patriotic, dictatorship for a few decades in order to modernize Pakistan and sweep away the old order.

mtma
01 November 2008 at 11:23

Well done Fatima on another smashing article! The Permanent Plunder Party bit was very witty and original :-) Are you considering joining Pakistani politics anytime in the future?

13 moons
01 November 2008 at 14:37

@writeon: the benevolent military dictator option is desirable but way too risky for us in pakistan.. don't you think? also, the pakistan military is very much part of the ruling elite, why would they willingly relinquish power? neither do i know of any fidel or che type revolutionaries willing to devote their lives to struggle and nation-building. . maybe hamid gul! i fear things will have to get much worse for people to react.. the suffering literally has to boil out on to the streets for us to see any changes

writeon
01 November 2008 at 15:01

13 moons,

I appriciate your views and I don't mean to appear glib in relation to a country, Pakistan, which is facing incredibly serious challenges. It's easy for me sitting here and not in Pakistan to theorize about what might be the 'best' option for a nation on the other side of the world!

Historically, most coutries have been born in armed conflict and welded together in blood and fire, just a superficial glance at Europe's past supports this view.

It isn't somehting I'm proud of or advocate for emulatin by developing countries. But repeatedly military leaders have had the means to 'get things done', be they kings or generals. Perhaps, ideally Pakistan needs someone like Simon Bolivar or even Fidel Castro, but where are heroes when one needs them? Maybe they don't exist anymore?

Of course, really ideally, I'd like to see the emergence of a strong, progressive and democratic movement in Pakistan, that could radically change the country without the use of violence, however, I'm not putting any money on that outcome, unfortunately.

What sickens me and makes me shake my head in incredulity, is the catastrophic short-sightedness of the West, and especially the Americans, in relation to Pakistan. They are making everything worse and are destabilizing the entire region. Turning Pakistan into a new Afghanistan seems to me close to insanity, and I hope that it doesn't happen, but given the stupidity, arrogance and ignorance of the Americans, I'm not optimistic.

writeon
01 November 2008 at 15:37

what I forgot to write, perhaps it's an easy thing, was the reason I posted today, what annoyed me. It was the lack of space and comment in the UK media about the latest US terror attack on a Pakistani village where over thirty people have been killed. I thought it would be on the front pages of today's press, but no, somehow these people don't matter that much.

Is it because we are, underneath the respectable gloss, really racists at heart, or is it 'merely' ignorance and lack of knowledge? Why don't these dead villagers count when they are blown to pieces? Compare for a moment the contrast if Palestinians had blown thirty Israelies to bits in an attack inside Israel. We would be on the verge of war, we would know their names, their hopes, their dreams; they would have individual identities, they would be humanized and we would share in the grief and the tragedy.

Yet when it comes to the killings in Pakistan, illegal attacks across the border by the Americans, we know virtually nothing; their is no inflated sympathy, not regret and no collective guilt. Dead Pakistanies don't really matter to us at all. We can kill and destroy these people with impunity from afar. It is digusting and revolts me.

Even when our cowardly politicians express regret, like Jack Straw, we know they are lying. It's pro forma. They have ethnic voters to placate and symbolically bow to. These politicians are truly vile creatures, beneath contempt, with blood and gore dripping from their hands and the stench of death follows them around.

Arish Tareen
01 November 2008 at 15:39

I can’t agree with Fatima more on the crisis facing Pakistan, on my recent visit to Pakistan which was just before Eid during the final days of Ramadan I saw less than usual families out on the normally busy shopping areas like Tariq road and Zamzama in Karachi, one of the main reason which was obvious was financial as the petrol prices had hiked and the spending power had diminished because of the sky rocketing costs. When sitting in the company of Mp’s of our beloved Provincial Assemblies and Members of National Assembly you hear less of development proposals but more of ways to make money for developing personal assets. A CEO of a major desalination plant in Karachi told me that the situation now after the PPP has taken over is worst than ever, as soon as he meets a Government official he gets the account number through a handshake!. After all said, Pakistan cannot be termed as a failed state it is a country blessed with mineral resources in Baluchistan, agriculture in Punjab and a sea port in Sindh, it can be rightly termed as a manipulated and an unlucky country with the twist of events in its history which haven’t gone its way!

ConcernedCitizen!
02 November 2008 at 17:41

Ever since it's formation Pakistan has been governed by self seeking egotistical maniacs with little regard for the country and people. All that has mattered is protecting ones cushy seat. Be it the Civilian, "democratically" elected or the Military leaders.

We in Pakistan need a new paradigm. We need a brand new stock of political leaders.

With an extremely talented and successful global diaspora of Pakistanis it doesn't make sense why, and how we can allow the scumbags of the the country at it's reigns.

What Pakistan needs is a Barack Obama -- someone who will put the peoples best interest before him/herself.

The Pakistani diaspora, private citizens, intelligencia, and civil societies are the nations last Hope for Change. I would like to call upon all Pakistani citizens, wherever they might be to join the Concerned Citizens of Pakistan platform. Lets take back our country!

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/concernedcitzenspk/

Ganesh mahadevan
02 November 2008 at 20:53

There is a so much talk in the press of sovereignty and

its violation by drones.

Fatima talks so much of pakistan, its people and

potential.

What about the violation of sovereignty by Uzbeks,

Arabs, Chechens .

What does Pakistan want to be, handmaiden of an

agitated component of the Umma or a nation on its

own?

Given things how they are, you should not be

complaining.

13 moons
02 November 2008 at 21:31

@writeon: i agree with you completely . . but please be sure that the US and UK are not shortsighted in the least . . their think-tanks have been hard at work since the 1920's researching every single possibility of every possible topic under the sun . . it is their extraordinary vision [information / speculation / manipulation], i.e., knowledge, that allows them the upper hand - pakistan's role in the new great game was probably decided in the 1970's - the regime changes we see every 5 to 10 years are simply a result of the americans clicking RESET - they do not intend to compromise their objectives any time soon

sweety
03 November 2008 at 01:45

Brave, proud muslims, from the land of the pure gave the communist chinese a huge England size bite of their country. Why not appease the Indians, like the chinese, and give them land for a lasting peace? This could also be given up as an example for the Arabs/and Israelis.

PS. Sorry, I thought you had moved from Rose Cottage, Muree, just past the boarded up Church!

Sana
03 November 2008 at 05:43

A very interesting account and i find it very hard not to agree. i would also lieke to add here that leaders come from the masses. We as an indiviudal should look @ ourselves again and think, what can we do to make tomorrow better for our children? To be honest I feel that the future is grim unless someone makes a positive movement. The Government of today or tomorrow will always be the same since it will always come from the people of this country. If you look @ the individuals, you will be left with utter disappointment. People whether they are on management level or clerical level, are a disappointing image. How can we expect a Government to be better if we are constantly failing as a nation? There being so many loop holes in our personalities and we use religion as an escapade. We need to change ourselves now. Impose education no matter what and impose rules like anything. I being in my twenties am not happy with what im seeing. Government can always be blamed and always will be, but what we need to see is how can we imrpove on individual level. only then we will be able to ensure a good leadership in the making. The people need encouragement on every level and a slight puch towards the positive path. Who can do this? The only answer is, Ourselves.

Sana Ashraf

jangikedi
03 November 2008 at 09:22

PART I

"The country's newly elected government, the first in the world headed by two former convicts (between them the president and prime minister have served time on charges of corruption, narcotics, extortion and murder, no less)..." Rather strange (perhaps bizarre) comment from the grand-daughter of a 'convicted murderer' Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, and daughter of Murtaza who would also have been convicted, had the real masters (read Army) of our country not saved him for the purpose of murdering him at a later stage when it suited them. After all he would have been regarded as a terrorist by the rulers of Paksitan and world at large. As far as I know, Zardari was not convicted by a court of law, but I might be ignorant of the true meaning of the word 'convict', not a native Englishman :-)

That Zardari is corrupt is a simple fact. Equally simple is the fact that Z.A.Bhutto did order the murder he was convicted of. But the fact also remains that both were not tried for the crime they were accused of: Z. A. Bhutto was tried for deviating from and daring to challenge the hegemonies of military elite as well as Imperialism. Zardari was held in jail not for getting a cut (almost all ruling politicians in Pakistan do get RUSHWAT or a cut), but a CUT FROM THE CUT of military officers who were never used to allow a civilian to even think of getting a cut.

Even though I am tempted to sympathize with Zardari for at least trying to get a cut from military men, I think a corrupt person will always remain corrupt. Hence Fatima is right on this.

But Ms. Bhutto might want to re-think her writing since she is converting herself into a typical westocratic journalist, most of whom (with very few exceptions like John Pilger for whom I came to this site) are deeply bigoted, and knowingly ignore uncomfortable facts to prove non-points, suitable to their current employers and west.

jangikedi
03 November 2008 at 09:38

PAT II

She writes "However, eight months into the new government's post-Musharraf rule, Pakistan's economy, sovereignty and freedoms have been considerably eroded."

Again same lack of depth and westocratic bigotry.

ECONOMY: Would she have challenged and done something differently from the hordes of neo-liberal market fundamentalists who run most of the world now and in the last decade, and in fact are the ultimate cause of present bubble-busted Pakistani economy? Can anyone at the helm of power in Pakistan (and indeed many many other countries in the world) do things very differently if from the very beginning one learns the 'art' of begging for foreign currency and money to *FEED* the army? Don't you see that even now when IMF tells us to reduce the defence expenses by 30%, no one will dare to do that. The reason would not be only the Army, but also the US which wants the army to work for it efficiently.

SOVEREIGNTY: I wonder what would others have done to safeguard the sovereignty of country which never had it. If Pakistan did indeed have sovereignty Zia-ul-Haq would not have succeeded in coming to power turning the country into a military base of US. We definitely would have had other problems, but a host of the present day problems would not have been with us.

FREEDOMS: Is it really worse than in the time of Musharraf? Many, including Safdar Sarki, who were tortured and jailed in the days of Mush might have a different idea. Any ways I don't claim it is all great, but not sure if it is worst than in the time of Mush.

Jangi Kedi

grandemocha
04 November 2008 at 01:04

@jangikedi - Yes, calling Zardari a convict shows how Fatima Bhutto's blind rage against him causes her to lose rationality. It shows her prejudice and puts the reader off. It is exactly like Ahmad Raza Kasuri calling ZAB a convict.

The rest of the article in which she uses facts to destroy the gov't is really good. I don't know about the press freedoms being farcical though. I still see Imran Khan coming on television ripping the gov't.

Pakistan will not get a good leader for a long, long time because in the next elections nawaz sharif will win and he'll also be horrible. Because that's exactly what he was in his previous two trips. The two major political parties in Pakistan are absolutely appalling and martial law is worse.

sweety
04 November 2008 at 01:07

But Ms. Bhutto might want to re-think her writing since she is converting herself into a typical westocratic journalist, most of whom..........................

This is so profound something that Fabians will never understand in a million years! These post colonial hybrids (my term) who have total and oppressive power their own country, coupled with almost unlimited ill gotten, money in our anglo-saxon common law system are untouchableand are indeed untouchables. This creates continous conflict. I did not want to ask the question in the begginning but what can MS. Bhutto offer us by writing here?

grandemocha
04 November 2008 at 01:49

@sweety - She can offer an honest critique of the gov't. I can tell you (living in the U.S.) that most people think Pakistan is progressing nicely now that there's a democratically elected gov't in power.

Somebody needs to counter the B.S. that ambassador Haqqani is speaking on a daily basis and Fatima Bhutto can do that.

masaslam
04 November 2008 at 13:07

We the Pakistanis, have the unique honor of having the most currupt person in the country, leading it, a LIAR, in the habit of eating his words, not keeping the promises, and to top it all, a prime minister who, on his first speech, declared and uttered very tall claims, but in the end, has pronen himself as IMPOTENT.

What a country

gnuneo
04 November 2008 at 20:45

masaslam - i thought GWB was still in charge of the US?? Or did you mean Blair?

Sharif
06 November 2008 at 09:15

A very pessimistic article, although there is some truth

in what Fatima says. Democracy sometimes produces

nuts, but since there is no alternative to rule of law,

with time they will improve, these politicians. For the

last 60 years, democracy has not been given any

chance to flourish. None of the elected governments

were allowed to last full term.- Dictators messed up

the scene and with bribes, job offers bought the elite. It

is like a child who is unable to walk properly and

needs a few years to mature. I doubt the current

government will get a chance either. Let us see.

Those who are longing for strong men again, are not

liberal or freedom lovers.

gnuneo
06 November 2008 at 20:37

indeed. Democracy does not come from 'strong men', democracy comes from 'the strong people'. It cannot be imposed upon people, it has to come *from* people. The problem for the people of Pakistan - a problem they share with virtually EVERY country in the World at the moment - is that they have corrupt leaders, and corrupt oppositions. There are few uncorrupted people near power, unfortunately THEY are often religiously motivated, not in a good way but in the way of imposing their religious vision upon all others. This, as we can see through even a brief look through human history, very rarely turns out well for the majority, and indeed usually ends up even more corrupted than the secularists. (When Power comes from Gawd, when politics and theology mix, who can hold such people accountable? Yet unaccountable power-brokers rarely stay uncorrupted...).

its a pickle, and one shared, as i said, across the entire globe.

saleem
09 November 2008 at 11:22

I congradulate Ms. Fatima Bhutto on writing an excellent article. It shows a true picture of situation in Pakistan. It is encouraging that most of the people have commented favourably. Remarks by Jangikedi, 03 Nov.2008, Part 1 about her father and grandfather are quite unrealistic. I knew Murtaza Bhutto and can say that he was an honest and straightforward person. He did what he believed in.

Saleem Sheikh

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker