Return to: Home | World Affairs | Asia

China's forgotten people

Amy Reger

Published 08 August 2008

This week's terror attack in China has brought an intense barrage of publicity to the Uighurs. Amy Reger writes that one violent act does not represent more than 10 million people

In the tiny offices of the Uyghur American Association/Uyghur Human Rights Project, our phones have rung off the hook since Monday morning. Journalists from four continents have called to hear our comments regarding Monday’s attack in Kashgar, East Turkestan, in which 16 border police were killed. Chinese government authorities are reporting that the attack was carried out by two young Uighur men, a fruit vendor and a taxi driver. Acts of this nature threaten to undermine the progress we have made in peaceful Uighur human rights advocacy in a single blow. They also threaten to instantly reduce the Uighur people and their rich cultural tapestry into a one-dimensional image of violence in the minds of millions.

While we welcome all media inquiries, it is unfortunate that an appalling, violent act such as this has been the impetus for an unprecedented level of interest in Uighurs and in our organization, which is dedicated to peacefully promoting human rights and democracy for the Uighur people. It is a tragedy that for most people around the world hearing news of the attack, this is the first time they will have ever heard of the Uighur people − and now, in their minds, the word “Uighur” will be associated with violence and the word “terrorism” that is splashed across the headlines of the world’s newspapers. Unsubstantiated links to Al-Qaeda proffered by China’s official media have been widely re-published in many Western news reports −the suggested linkage is too newsworthy to ignore, yet at the same time impossible for deadline-pressed media to independently check out.

Unfortunately for Uighurs, they live in a world where their belief in Islam, despite their strongly pro-Western attitudes and the traditionally moderate practice of their faith, unfairly brands them as a group that is prone to violence and fundamentalism. Moreover, the Chinese government has exploited the demonization of Islam and the “global war on terror” in order to justify its heavy-handed repression of millions of Uighurs. China’s propaganda apparatus has become increasingly sophisticated at projecting an image on the world stage of a major, well-organized Uighur terrorist threat, which helps to crowd out discussion of the decades-long history of human rights abuses visited upon the Uighurs.

The more than ten million Uighurs of East Turkestan face human rights abuses nearly identical to those faced by Tibetans; arbitrary detention and imprisonment, religious repression, economic and educational discrimination, and the steady eradication of their language and culture from public life and institutions. While many people around the world have some knowledge of the suffering of the Tibetan people (thanks to decades of courageous advocacy on the part of Tibetans and their supporters), and a sympathetic view of Buddhism, relatively few have heard of the Uighurs and their plight, and their religion makes it easy for people to accept Chinese government assertions about Muslim “extremism” among Uighurs. In addition, the Chinese government frequently applies the “terrorist” label to Uighurs where it would use the term “separatist” to describe Tibetans or other groups.

The Uighur American Association’s small staff faces a daunting challenge – how to compete with a relentless Chinese government propaganda machine, and attempt to inform the world about human rights abuses committed against a people they’ve probably never heard of except in relation to a violent act. We must also attempt to ensure that no one misinterprets our human rights advocacy as an attempt to downplay or justify a terrible act of aggression. We face an uphill battle against facile sensationalism, exploited by the Chinese government; we are also competing against a sea of Olympic puff-pieces and “colour stories” produced by multi-million-dollar television news outlets. Relatively few news outlets dare to venture out of comfortable territory to produce nuanced pieces on Uighurs or similarly non-traditional subjects.
However, facing a much graver set of circumstances are the Uighur people in East Turkestan themselves, and particularly Uighurs in Kashgar, who are now being subjected to even greater intimidation and persecution than ever before. We have reliable reports of Uighurs being summarily rounded up in one area of Kashgar in the past week; police going door-to-door in Uighur neighborhoods and checking everyone’s identity papers; the closure of at least one mosque in the city, and the stepped-up blockage of Internet access.

In recent months in East Turkestan, Uighurs’ passports have been almost universally confiscated by authorities; large numbers of Uighurs have been evicted from major cities in East Turkestan, including those who had legal rights to stay in those cities; and at least one mosque was destroyed, apparently due to parishioners’ refusal to post Olympics slogans on its walls. In addition, Uighurs in East Turkistan have been told to avoid contact with foreigners, especially foreign journalists, and Uighur imams have been ordered to undergo “political education” regarding the Olympics.

Many Uighurs who had been living in Beijing have been forced to leave the city, and official directives have been issued to hotels and guesthouses throughout Beijing not to permit Uighurs to stay there.
On July 9, five young Uighurs were shot to death without warning by police in the regional capital of Urumchi, in a raid on an alleged “holy war training group”. On the same day, following a mass sentencing rally in Kashgar, two Uyghurs were executed and 15 others were handed sentences ranging from 10 years in prison to death on unsubstantiated terror-related charges. Schoolchildren were among the 10,000 Uighurs forced to attend the rally.

Since 2001, using “terrorism” as a justification, the Chinese government has undertaken a renewed, systematic, and sustained crackdown on all forms of Uyghur dissent. Those targeted in this crackdown include two sons of Uighur freedom movement leader Rebiya Kadeer, Alim and Ablikim Abdureyim, serving lengthy prison sentences because of their mother’s Uighur human rights advocacy (Ms. Kadeer is president of the Uyghur American Association); Nurmemet Yasin, a young intellectual imprisoned for writing a story about a pigeon that authorities deemed subversive; and schoolteacher Abdulghani Memetemin, imprisoned for providing documentation of human rights abuses to an overseas group.

While the Chinese government promotes an image of itself as a nation unified in ethnic brotherhood, in the manner of the Olympic slogan “One World, One Dream,” it is simultaneously demonizing the Uighur people as a whole. It has every right to condemn a violent attack on its soil, and to secure itself against the threat of violence and terrorism throughout the PRC. But the killings in Kashgar should not be used as an excuse to continue and even intensify egregious human rights abuses in East Turkestan. They should also not be used as a vehicle to exacerbate tensions between Han Chinese and Uighurs.

The international community should also refrain from judging the Uighur people as a whole on the actions of a tiny minority. We urge readers to learn more about the Uighur people and their rich Turkic heritage and culture; to visit East Turkestan if you are traveling to China to attend the Olympics; and to educate yourself about the harsh, government-sponsored suppression that is threatening to eradicate Uighurs’ culture and way of life.

Amy Reger is principal researcher for the Uyghur American Association’s Uyghur Human Rights Project, based in Washington, D.C.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

8 comments from readers

Douglas Chalmers
09 August 2008 at 12:15

Ughh, no, not another Washington-based so-called Human Rights project..... just read CIA opportunists! Maybe they have a sister organization in Germany just like the Tibetan separatists for rabble-rousing with NATO?

Isn't "...peacefully promoting human rights and democracy for the Uighur (or Tibetan) people..." merely code for a separatist movement these days? What it means is an independence movement in essence and a return to elitism.

They will end up like Georgia if they try breaking away from the East Asian version of the European Union now known as One China. Its to their advantage to stay..... and be good members of a union of 1.3 billion people.

Lewis B
10 August 2008 at 03:09

Mr. Chalmers makes a comment that is a measure of his own narrow and very fashionable world view (probably as a PRC partisan with deep anti-American feelings and beliefs). Of course we all have our own perspectives and are entitled to our own opinions, and even if he wasn't he'd have one anyway. However, I also believe we should emulate JS Mill and try to be Socrates dissatisfied rather than a pig satisfied. Therefore, in this spirit of spreading knowledge, I would recommend he read a couple of books that may cause him to re-think his position, although I doubt it--his comment indicates a closed mind. The literature on the subject of the Chinese relationship with the peoples on its borders is vast. A good place to start is Peter C. Perdue, China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia (2005) and an older book, Wen-Djang Chu, The Moslem Rebellion in Northwest China, 1862-1878: A Study of Government Minority Policy (1966).

Douglas Chalmers
10 August 2008 at 06:28

Lewis B ever trying to justify the British invasion of Tibet and of India? Gunboat diplomacy inflicted upon China by Britain (and the USA) has generations of sleazy apologists whining after their own long-lost empire. Such hypocrites! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ow3sK5rDSg

Interesting to note, though, that Google has currently blocked access to this page from the Tibetan Government-in-Exile's website ( http://www.tibet.com/ ) via its search engine and dishonestly stated that "This site may harm your computer..." although opening it independently proves it to be quite harmless.....

"Unable to communicate effectively with Tibet, Britain approached the Manchu Court for assistance in forcing Tibet to cooperate..." http://www.tibet.com/whitepaper/white1.html

Souvik Mukherjee
10 August 2008 at 08:52

It's nice to see people from the 'West' thinking beyond their own backyards. 'The British invasion of Tibet and of India' is the most simplistic clubbing together of historical events that I have ever come across. While the British 'invasion' of India (it was slow poisoning rather than an invasion, I should think) was pretty despicable, it wasn't any worse than any other such action. The Chinese repression of Tibetan and Uighur communities is no exception. I am not too knowledgeable about the Uighurs but the Tibetan situation is certainly a case in point.

Douglas Chalmers
10 August 2008 at 12:03

Another anti-Chinese, Souvik Mukherjee? Not being able to get over past border conflicts with China, you apparently can hardly wait for the West to solve your problems with Pakistan - by invading them just as they once did with India! You surely must know that you are crazy "Lagaan", uhh.

Akhiyan Milaoon Kabhi, ha ha http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJvT7Z1Ek8k - better think beyond your OWN backyard, Souvik Mukherjee, eh? The future is bright, the future is nuclear..... so watch out, eh!

sweety
11 August 2008 at 03:30

Tibet is an amazing example of "Tamerlane" like unjustice that eclipses, even for want of better word, Palestine and the Indian racism and oppression of its ethnic minorities within the borders of their Empire. At least Younghusband in his more reflective years was given a medal of honour and even Dyers was given by public subscription, no less a substantial gold medal for saving the Sikhs of Amirstar.

HumaneChina
16 March 2009 at 16:10

I am mainland Chinese, and what Douglas Chalmers says is the kind of phobia I expect from narrow minded, vaguely educated people. I do not want independence, but I do not approve of human rights abuse anywhere. Chalmers addresses neither adequately but is instead obcessed with his idea of covert operations in the past. His understanding of the shifting political views within the US government on covert operations is clearly lacking. Please wake up to human compassion and the 21st century.

HumaneChina
16 March 2009 at 16:18

@Douglas Chalmers: I am mainland Chinese, and I am disappointed by your ignorance and lack of human compassion. Human rights and independence are separate issues and to mix them on some cold war paranoia is the problem of this world. Your lack of understanding for US policy regarding covert action in certain areas since the Iranian revolution is all too obvious.

You speak of humanity as if it only existed in the pages of books and imagination. The suffering is very real and whatever motives studies group have or do not have, doesn't strip that away.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker