Return to: Home | World Affairs | Asia

After the Games, China must face reality

Lindsey Hilsum

Published 21 August 2008

It's time for Beijing's bureaucrats to turn their attention to the real problems facing the country

Journalists make poor prophets, but I think I'm on safe ground here: early next week the Chinese government will declare that the Olympics have been a roaring success. The International Olympic Committee - an organisation only marginally less authoritarian than the Chinese Communist Party - will agree. Someone will say, "It was the best Olympics ever."

Then, maybe, the bureaucrats who run the country will feel secure enough to stop worrying about how China looks to the outside world and will turn their attention to the real problems affecting the Chinese people. In their fervour to stage a good Olympics, the country's rulers have equated the national image with the national interest. So, anything deemed unsightly - old buildings, people with awkward opinions, the poor - has been destroyed or swept out of sight.

The result has been a Potemkin Olympics, where visitors have seen a gleaming Olympic Village full of happy volunteers and cheering fans, while the complex reality of a flawed but dynamic society has been obscured.

The passion and pain with which Chinese people experienced sporting triumph and disappointment exposed just how deeply confused image and interest have become. Tan Zongliang, who won bronze in the 50m air-pistol shooting contest, told a Chinese journalist that he felt like a failure. "I have been nurtured by my country, yet I have let my country down," he said.

Huang Yubin, head coach of the national gymnastics team, said he would commit suicide if his team won only one gold medal. When they swept the board, he said, "Thank you for not letting me jump."

The entire country wept when China's great hope in the hurdles, Liu Xiang, limped off injured. "When he won the gold medal in 2004, he earned honour not only for China, but also for Asia," said a 16-year-old schoolgirl, walking past one of the ubiquitous images of Liu advertising Nike running shoes. "After him, the world looked at China differently."

Most of the world was in fact oblivious to Liu's gold medal triumph in the 2004 Athens Games. But perception creates its own reality, and the Olympics have given China reason to feel more confident. They have not, however, changed the internal dynamics of the country. The 1988 Olympics in Seoul are often cited as an example of how the Games can help a country become more democratic. The South Korean government wanted the world to see it as an emerging dem ocracy, not a dictatorship, so it made real political changes. That has not happened in China.

Susan Shirk, a former US state department official, says that Chinese and Americans have differing reactions to her new book, China: the Fragile Superpower. Americans usually say: "What do you mean, 'fragile'?" Chinese say, "What do you mean: 'superpower'?" In America and Europe, China's superpower status is often presented as a fait accompli, as if there were no longer - according to World Bank figures - 300 million people living in poverty, and a bureaucracy battling to manage its new-found diplomatic and economic reach. The Chinese, by contrast, are only too aware of how difficult it is to shoot to stardom so quickly, how great are the tensions created by rapid economic growth.

Pulling off a successful Olympics may have enabled the Chinese government to feel more secure about its standing in the world, but if outsiders judge China only by the shimmering opening and closing ceremonies, they will find its coming struggles hard to comprehend.

The public figure who appears most in sympathy with the needs of ordinary people is Prime Minister Wen Jiabao, or "Grandpa Wen", as he became known after visiting earthquake victims in Sichuan in May. He has been noticeably absent from the Olympic festivities, while the rather formal and distant president, Hu Jintao, and his heir apparent, Xi Jinping, have attended several events. But Wen's touch is needed now.

With inflation above 6 per cent, and the world economy slowing, the government has a number of complex economic problems to solve. Senior party officials know they must address the growing gap between rich and poor, and endemic corruption, before discontent gets out of hand. The government has silenced dissenters by locking them up during the Games, but soon they will have to let out at least a few and deal with some of the issues they raise.

The Chinese government is in no way democratic, but its rapid and effective response to the earthquake indicates that it is accountable. When things go wrong, people expect their officials to respond. Chinese people took on the Olympics as a civic duty and a matter of national pride. Most appear to have enjoyed it, but now they may start to demand that the government concentrate on their needs, rather than trying to impress foreigners.

Lindsey Hilsum is China correspondent for Channel 4 News

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

12 comments from readers

Sharif
21 August 2008 at 14:38

China is not democratic, I agree Lindsay, but what they have achieved is nothing less than 'Wirtchaftswunder' of after war Germany. They have not only won the most medals, they have also decreased to poverty line to respectable levels. Only a decade ago those living below poverty lines amounted to 200 million people, now they are merely 25 million.

Freedom to vote and change an incompetent government once in 4 or 5 years is important, but most importent is the freedom to eat 3 meals a day, a school for your kids and hospitals when you are sick. Isn't it, Lindsay?

Just look at India or Pakistan, just to mention two. A large minority are poor and cannot make both ends meet. Elections? I don't think that is on their minds.

China must change, but you have to admire it for achieving so much in such a short time.

bajaj
21 August 2008 at 17:07

i think the western media has a habit of showing negativities about the east, and i think west should try to tolerate the success of east which i dont think west is able to do.

Douglas Chalmers
21 August 2008 at 19:19

Well, "a Potemkin Olympics" sounds a bit cheesy, Lindsey Hilsum, but wasn't it ironic that the NATO puppet twit in Georgia went out of his way to rile the Russians as the Games opened?

People in the West really must start to learn to mind their own business as regards China and Asia (and Russia). "Sweeping their own doorsteps" before criticizing other would be a good start.

Facing up to the human rights abuses of the USA since the 1950's and their Neocons agenda of global domination would be a way to improve things instead of rudely finger-pointing at those in Asia who are trying to improve their lot yet have never threatened the world with WW3 or ever dropped a nuclear bomb on anyone, uhh.

vivian
21 August 2008 at 22:22

Douglas I agree with you.

China does not need us dictating to them. Mao liberated them from the English and the French who treated them as less than human, and thanks to Mao, they have slowly risen to have accomplished what we see today.

At least, China has taken care of the neocon agenda of american domination for this century and for that I shall be eternally grateful to China. The US with its never-ending interference in other countries, so many countries, from South America to Iraq, has a lot to answer for, so stop judging others.

kklimmy
21 August 2008 at 23:50

It is easy to criticise China but can I ask how many governments in the World at large have the experience of governing a country of 1.3 billion people? Sure ther are many undesirable features in the present government of China but the problems they face are enormous, and at least they try! What people must understand is after a deep 150 years of sleep, China is now emergining into "modernity", it is in fact experiencing a renaissance! And as far as the Chinese are concerned they are stoic having "eaten bitterness" for countless generations, but the present government has given them more than any government has in the past. The people believe "we" is more important than "I". So change will come but at China's own pace not at the pace dictated by so called "human rights" and "neocons" do-gooders!

nawawimohamad
22 August 2008 at 09:58

I am not impressed by the olympics simply because it is a waste of time, money and resources which could be put to better use rather than to benefit a few group of people and the commercial enterprises. Whatever apparent achievements are culminated in just a few moments of glory.

After the olympics everybody have to face with realities of continuing the struggle to live and for some to survive, there is no lasting benefit and not even a short relieve!

I think it is a mistake for China to host the games since it has to spend a lot of money for no lasting benefit. On the other hand this is one of the ways the west managed to deprive China of overall progress by convincing the Chinese to deplete its coffers unwisely by staging the games creating opportunities for the west to siphon back the money. This is akin to Hong Kong whereby the British manage to deplete Hong Kong some 20 billion USD by constructing the new airport during the handover of Hong Kong to China.

China should have used the money to create more industrial zones in other parts of the country. It is also very short-sighted for the politburo to try to convince the world and the Chinese population of its current achievements using the soon to be forgotten Beijing games.

manishkanti
22 August 2008 at 17:12

Admittedly China now is a Superpower. This now is internationally accepted. Ppeople from all over the world come back from China mostly with admiration. But wsa it really necessary to uproot lakhs of people ,drive them out of Beijing in untold misery? Does this glitter & glam rally impress people ? Any experienced traveller will surmise what went on behind the outward shine. Afterall there is no country in the world sans poverty. And all said & done the Olympics is an sporting event. Was Athens Olympics was less sucsessful as a sporting event withou this kind of razmatatz? What the Chinese did is display an typical Asian (Japan excepted)inferiority complex.

Riaz Ahmad
24 August 2008 at 11:02

Lindsey should be given the nobel prize for prepoganda, about time she starts noticing the economic miracle China is going through. Lindsey is writing by scratching the surface, had she the brain or the intention of exploring the deeper Chinese mindset, she will laugh at what she is writing. Like all westren minds, she finds it difficult to come to terms with the indispensable shift of power from the west to Asia and the peaceful rise of China. America fighting illegal wars on Chinese credit card is far more relevent topic for Lindsey to write.

Douglas Chalmers
25 August 2008 at 17:29

#manishkanti, it is easy to say that it would have been better to spend $40 billion on other things in China but they are one fifth of humanity and how they invest in their future is up to them.

It takes many years of planning and expenditure to create an Olympic Games and it can't be changed for something else mid-stream. What is superlative is that they have continued to host it as well as cope successfully with a major 8.0 magnitude earthquake and some severe flooding in other regions as well.

For those who appreciated the enthusiasm and joy and love of the BeiJing Olympics and the Chinese people, don't forget to contribute to their earthquake appeal if you can. Major banks still have the account details for that or you can go to the Chinese Red Cross on the net at http://english.cri.cn/tools/online/crcf/index.htm

Your "inferiority complex" jibe truly is disgusting, though, manishkanti.

sweetkaseh
26 August 2008 at 05:03

Lindsey Hilsum, the Chinese know how to treat people like you connected to the Eurotrash -liberal umbilical cord. When will you realize that you are are a minority and the Chinese masses are not necessarily waiting to join your fold.? You have done well out of the China gravy train, you would be lucky to run a noodle stall in any other circumstances, be thankful and rejoice as the woman once said!

nawawimohamad
26 August 2008 at 09:46

Does a man have to be driving a Rolls Royce, in the best suits money can buy with all the expensive paraphernalia to feel confident of himself, to restore his self esteem and convince himself of his well being? Then waitng for the applause from others! I have so much pity for this idiot with so much inferiority complex of himself! This is what China has been.

cerebrate
17 September 2008 at 14:42

Are you leaving China for good? That would be a pity since we all enjoy reading and writing comments for your articles. ^_^

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Lindsey Hilsum

Lindsey Hilsum is China Correspondent for Channel 4 News. She has previously reported extensively from Africa, the Middle East, the Balkans and Latin America.

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker