Registered user login:

Beijing prepares for the no-fun Olympics

Lindsey Hilsum

Published 10 July 2008

Factories shut, workers laid off, no frolicking on cars - in fact, forget fun - it's all for an Olympic games that will look on telly

The management office for my apartment complex rang this week to tell me which police station I should report to when I next return from a trip overseas.

As I am not a criminal on parole, I have no intention of reporting to any police station. But as a journalist, I am often followed by the police; and quite possibly they tap my phone and read my emails, so I figure it's their job to find me.

This is par for the course in China now, as the government tries to keep tabs on all the foreigners it has to put up with, who are in the country for the Olympics, while keeping out the rest. One friend is having to leave her house because the police tell her landlord they're nervous about a foreigner living there during the Olympic period. No further reason is needed.

New visa restrictions are catching tens of thousands in a dragnet. Foreign students who had hoped to spend the summer here have been told to leave and reapply for visas in October. Tourists have to produce Olympic tickets, hotel reservations and confirmed flights before applying for a visa - and still they may be refused.

"They're paranoid," says Gilbert van Kerckhove, a Belgian businessman who has been advising the Beijing city authorities on the Olympics, apparently with little success. "They can't distinguish between a genuine tourist and the guy who may have a banner saying 'I Love Dalai Lama'. So the extremists say: If we cannot control the flow of people coming to China, let's just shut down as much as we can, and never mind the consequences."

The consequences are being felt by business: the Shanghai-based management consulting firm Access Asia says that independent inspectors who must visit Chinese factories to check Christmas orders have been denied entry. Quality assurance staff and teachers at language training centres are also finding it hard to get visas.

Anyone who runs a business in or near Beijing knows they will take a big hit over the Olympic period. Factories are being closed to try to curb pollution: owners will suffer losses; workers may be docked pay. Many firms can't get supplies, as trucks are no longer allowed to enter the capital.

The Chinese government, it seems, does not care how much it costs, nor whom it pays, provided the Games look good on television. The aim is a picture-perfect Olympics.

With some 80 heads of state expected for the opening ceremony, precautions must be taken against terrorism. But no distinction is being made between violence and peaceful protest.

Last month, the human rights activist Maggie Hou was seized from a cafe and "disappeared" for 18 days, during which time she was interrogated about a US-based group called the Human Rights Torch Relay. She was released only after she signed a statement agreeing not to take part in protests. "They wanted to know exactly how many people were involved in Human Rights Torch," she said. "They were very concerned that Chinese domestic activists might work together with those from overseas."

The Chinese government prizes stability above all else, hence the strict instructions to provincial party bosses to ensure that no one with a grievance makes it to Beijing to "petition" during the Games. Any protest would be regarded as a loss of face, an unspeakable embarrassment.

But the bureaucrats have failed to understand what the rest of the world might regard as a successful Olympics. Quite apart from the sport, people want to have fun. The Sydney Olympics of 2000 are widely regarded as one of the best, because those who didn't have tickets gathered in parks where they could eat, drink, make merry and watch the events on huge screens. Then they went out and partied. Everyone had a great time.

However, bar owners in Beijing have been warned that the 2am curfew allegedly stipulated in the capital's by-laws (which, it seems, no one has ever heard of before) will be strictly enforced. The Stone Boat, a charming cafe and bar in a park, has been told it can remain open, but only if it no longer has live music, one of its main attractions. And the Olympic Legal Handbook - which has been distributed to Beijing residents - bans, of all things, "frolicking on cars and in bicycle lanes".

"It's like the old story about the tree in the courtyard," says van Kerckhove. "People always go to pee against the tree, and this is very ugly. How do you solve the problem? Cut down the tree!" So busy is the Chinese government creating a smooth, perfect landscape, that it may never understand how everyone else is rather fond of trees.

Lindsey Hilsum is China correspondent for Channel 4 News

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

10 comments from readers

CulDeSac
10 July 2008 at 11:32

Oh big deal. Those visa restrictions are not unlike from those that Europe imposes on most African/Asian tourists through its Schengen system. Not so great now the shoe is on the other foot, eh? Constant and whinging China-bashing is all very well to fill newspapers and magazines, but if you can be bothered to examine the mote in your own eye, you might see that the West is very, very far from perfect.

timfree
11 July 2008 at 01:42

Yep, I think we need to stop criticizing and start building something better.

zikzate
11 July 2008 at 18:22

This is the point of the the Olympics. It has nothing to do with sport: it is just another propaganda event, but for an international audience.

http://www.x3n.org/2008/07/what-olympics-means-to-china.html

MarkBin
12 July 2008 at 03:26

CulDeSac and timfree

Boring responses. You obviously don't live in Beijing. I do. And I can tell you there is no pre-Games celebratory atmosphere in the city. It's just rules rules rules. The clampdown and the pollution are making the run-up to the games a pretty miserable place to be. I've been visited by paranoid police around six times this year to check that I've got proper documents. And there are signs all over the place telling people to make the Olympics a safe and civilised success. Offices lining the third ring road have had their windows sealed to apparently prevent snipers. I recently visited Dalian and had hotel staff asking where I'd come from and was going to because the police wanted to know as a precautionary Olympic measure. I've had friends who had to go back to the UK to reapply for their visa. (so much for the green Olympics - what a waste of kerosene) It's way over the top, and it's not just foreigners who are moaning. I know one company where virtually all the Chinese staff are getting really jaded by it. One Chinese person I know recently dreamt the government banned eating during the Olympics fortnight, so disturbed is she by all the restrictions.

Riaz Ahmad
14 July 2008 at 11:08

Every article Lindsey has ever written about China is negative, she has rendered herself blind to anything positive about China. What took the west close to 200 years to achieve, China has done it in mere 25 odd years, a miracle in it self. Never has a state lifted so many millions out of powerty in such a short time. Lindsey, Europe and USA hate to face the inevitable reality, China is both economic and military super power, couple of decades more, it will be THE biggest economic power. USA is already living on borrowed money. If it was a company, it would have been declared bankrupt. Will any one take this article serious person, negatively biased against China.

MarkBin
14 July 2008 at 12:39

Riaz Ahman, China has achieved much in 25 years thanks largely to investment from the 'bankrupt West' and easing of trade rules by a corrupt dictatorship. It's no miracle. Can you point me to any inaccuracies in Lindsey's work?

ikotubo
15 July 2008 at 19:43

The GENOCIDE Olympics, perhaps?

nawawimohamad
16 July 2008 at 08:41

The olympics is a farce. The money and resources spent could be put to better use instead of enriching some group of people.

What have the previous olympians gained from the previous olympics? Is there a sustainable growth for the countries that hosted it and is there a lasting benefit and happiness for the individuals, but above all is there anything for humanity?

The olympics have been commercialised, politicised, terrorised, scandalised and what not, but it has not been humanised.

zikzate
22 July 2008 at 17:09

Inside Games: What The Beijing Olympics Is Really About

Lately, the Olympics has started to remind us of the kind of conversation wherein someone is prepared to reveal a secret, but the key details are not forthcoming. Rather, the speaker dances around the facts, dropping a hint here and there at a carefully measured pace, meanwhile we sit silently, captivated and spellbound awaiting the payoff when the whole truth is finally revealed to us. So we will wait another 19 days for the start of Games of the XXIX Olympiad.

More: http://www.x3n.org/2008/07/inside-games-what-beijing-olympic...

cerebrate
28 July 2008 at 16:31

Perhaps Lindsey suggests that heavy congestion, smog, protest and bombing are great fun for this Olympics

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Lindsey Hilsum

Lindsey Hilsum is China Correspondent for Channel 4 News. She has previously reported extensively from Africa, the Middle East, the Balkans and Latin America.

Read More

Vote!

Is capitalism finished?