Return to: Home | World Affairs | Asia

There are other Tibets

Lindsey Hilsum

Published 01 May 2008

In Xinjiang, as in Tibet, the government tries to bend unwilling subjects to its will, rather than accommodate the disparate cultures and beliefs

In the central square, under the gaze of a giant statue of Mao and a grateful peasant, a hundred young people in tracksuits pledged allegiance to the flag. They held up their fists in a lacklustre manner and chorused: "I solemnly swear not to let down the motherland . . ."

We were in Hotan, in China's far western Xinjiang Province, 2,000 miles from Beijing but only 300 from Islamabad. Many of the Uighur people who live here do not accept that China is their motherland at all. Xinjiang is the other Tibet, where restive Muslims rather than Buddhists chafe under Chinese rule, and 18-year-olds are forced to undergo a citizenship ceremony, in the hope that this will, somehow, make them loyal to the Chinese Communist Party.

The government says Uighur terrorists, in league with al-Qaeda, are plotting to disrupt the Beijing Olympics in August, targeting foreign athletes and journalists. After 9/11, the Chinese started to refer to Uighur separatists as "terrorists", a move that persuaded the Americans to put a small and ineffective rebel group, the East Turkestan Islamic Movement, on its terror list.

There is little proof that the threat of terrorism is grave, but ample evidence that the Uighurs pose a challenge to the official view of all China's ethnic minorities as one big, happy family.

Hotan town centre is all white tiles and blue window glass, like any Chinese city. Han Chinese, encouraged to migrate here as an extension of Beijing's power, have clustered their shops around a military post. They know they are seen as emissaries of an alien, much-resented power.

"If the Uighurs protest, we don't feel safe," said a Han shop owner. "Of course we're afraid."

Half a mile away, the mosque dominates the Uighur part of town, where donkey carts weave their perilous way through hooting traffic and bearded men earnestly discuss the price of jade, gleaned from the nearby riverbed. At the end of March, protests erupted during Sunday market after news spread that a prominent Uighur jade merchant, Mutallip Hajim, had died in police custody. Then the women started demonstrating for the right to wear the hijab at work. The protests were rapidly quelled.

It was hard to establish why Hajim had been arrested in the first place. His padlocked shop was covered in notices reading "Sealed by the Public Security Bureau". When approached, his neighbours simply said: "We're too frightened to talk." Outside, young men in sunglasses and T-shirts shifted from foot to foot, pretending to look the other way. The spies of Hotan make little effort to hide their identity - their job is as much to intimidate as to gather intelligence.

Gradually we got a few answers. "He became too powerful." "He gave money to an Islamic school." An old man in a trademark Uighur green-and-white pillbox hat told us that many had been arrested since the demonstrations.

"This place belongs to Uighurs," he said. "But we get arrested if we read the Quran and go to mosque. People are arrested every day and taken to detention centres, where they're locked up and beaten. Everybody is afraid."

Another man risked arrest or worse to show us a detention centre in town and a labour camp a few miles out, where we could see prisoners in orange jerkins tilling the land, watched by guards sitting on stools.

Dominated by the Taklamakan Desert, fringed by the Pamir and Karakoram Mountains, Xinjiang is so remote that it is scarcely reported. In the 1930s, the Times correspondent Peter Fleming brought back "news from Tartary". These days it is less romantic, but equally obscure. Westerners are partial to Tibetans, primarily because they feel - mistakenly - that Buddhists are intrinsically peaceful, and partly because Hollywood stars have publicised the cause. By contrast, some of the old Uighur man's complaints would garner little sympathy in London or Washington. "The women of Afghanistan all wear the hijab, so why shouldn't ours?" he said.

Yet the Uighurs suffer similar discrimination at the hands of the Chinese state. No one under 18 is allowed to enter a mosque, and praying is strictly controlled. Their culture, which has much in common with that of their neighbours in Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and other central Asian states, is regarded as a source of entertainment. In a Chinese version of The Black and White Minstrel Show, Uighur dances will be performed at this year's Olympic Games.

"To China, the most important thing is territorial sovereignty," said Wang Lixiong, a writer who has criticised government policy in Xinjiang and Tibet. "The question is whether Uighurs and other ethnic groups in this territory can be assimilated as the government wishes." For the moment, the answer seems to be no.

At the market, a balding camel sauntered among the stalls while an itinerant preacher ranted outside the mosque. A few Han Chinese haggled over jade, but this did not feel like China. In Xinjiang, as in Tibet, the government tries to bend unwilling subjects to its will, rather than accommodate the disparate cultures and beliefs.

"Rebels are everywhere in Xinjiang. They make small bombs at home, but they can't make big ones," said the old man. "We all want to be independent. Russia split into seven or eight countries, and we want the same."

Lindsey Hilsum is China correspondent for Channel 4 News

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

5 comments from readers

explodingbadger
02 May 2008 at 09:20

Until we no longer interfere or invade other countries and leave them in peace to live as they choose, we have no right to criticize China. The first step would be to leave Iraq and Afghanistan.

mutikonka
06 May 2008 at 08:03

"the Chinese government tries to bend unwilling subjects to its will ..."

Nothing new here - Frank Kingdon Ward made the same observation in while plant huntng in the Tibet borderlands in 1911!

dajones
06 May 2008 at 18:25

I am glad that I've the chance to read this article - just like having the chance to read others. And I am also glad that to read the 2 comments from readers.

If you read Chinese history, you would know that a lot of the surrounding countries of ancient China kowtow to China when they were weak and they invaded China when they were strong. It has been a love&hate relationship for thousands of years in Chinese history. What is Han what is non-Han is really up to the hand who rock the cradle.

From human right point of view, China is wrong but as a country, its direction is correct. There were documentaries on BBC 3 years ago about China's policy to Tibet saying Chinese gov has been given a lot of supports to Tibetian eg housing, utilities,school. For a 'developing' country, China has a lot of children in remote areas have no school to attend. Thus, the Hope Projects.

If you critisize China's treatments to 'terrorists', how about the USA and the UK?

As a race, Chinese is the unheard unseen group. They never cause any problem to the countries they live in. But Chinese has always been picked on just because they dont trouble anyone. Or they are too wealthy or work too hard. Look at Indonisa, Africa, Philippine, USA even UK.

I really feel deeply sorry for Chinese.

williamw
06 May 2008 at 18:57

Uighurs are being treated fairly in China. There were 56 nationalities in China, so why was it just the Uighurs and the Tibetans who complained? Why not the Mongols? Why not the Manchus? Why not the Zhuang? This just goes to show that really it's the troublemakers themselves who instigated separatism out of baseless claims. There are also a minority Uighur population that has turned violent and linked themselves to terrorism... those people are especially dangerous and should be halted.

newgenerationtb
30 May 2008 at 04:58

Chinese are picked and singled out because Chinese invaded other countries. CHines are spied who are stealing stuffs from western countries. If you cannot believe, ask Washington how many Chinese spies were caught red-handed! As someone pointed out like, "in Chinese history", what the fuck is it? As much as Chinese has history, Urgurs and Tibetans also have equal history. Why can not it be in Ugyur and Tibetan history? Why should you be so biased? I am asking you to support us, simply be at the centre and talk from every perspective!

Long live the Tibetans and Ugyurs!

Independence for Tibet and East Turkistan!

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Lindsey Hilsum

Lindsey Hilsum is China Correspondent for Channel 4 News. She has previously reported extensively from Africa, the Middle East, the Balkans and Latin America.

Read More

Vote!

Will China rule the world?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker