Culture vultures
Will the Olympics really be bad for the arts? David Lammy outlines his plans for the 2012 "Cultural
By David Lammy Published 14 May 2007You have got to hand it to the arts world. No sooner has the Prime Minister hailed record public investment leading to a "quiet revo lution" and a "golden age" for culture in this country than the critical onslaught begins. For the composer and conductor Peter Maxwell Davies, Tony Blair is a "philistine". The critic A N Wilson describes our cultural policy as the "moronisation" of Britain, and the director of the National Theatre, Nicholas Hytner, lambastes our "spectacular lack of logic" for trans ferring Lottery money from the arts to help fund the 2012 Olympics.
Where did it all go wrong? In fact, it didn't go wrong at all. The leaders of the arts world, rightly, are hard-wired to be sceptical about governments and politicians. Because of this - and their innate creativity, of course - they form an exceptionally eye-catching lobby, and slagging off the personal cultural preferences of ministers is part of that package. But the recent argument about funding, and the way it swiftly tumbles into a debate about the arts versus sport, need to be tackled.
The fact is that the National Lottery has always been geared towards one-off projects and other things that routine public investment couldn't reach. The 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games are a classic example of this. That is why we made it clear from the start that we would use the Lottery as part of the funding package. However, we have also made it plain that no existing Lottery project will be cut. The diversions we make will be time-limited and will amount to £28m per year for the arts. That is just 5 per cent of the total income for the arts across those 48 months. Other Lottery distributors will be making contributions along the same proportions.
There will be a payback, too - not only in cash terms when the Olympic land and buildings are eventually sold, but also from the cultural elements of the 2012 package. The central plank of this will be the Cultural Olympiad, which will start in 2008 and run through to the Games in 2012. The Olympiad - like the Olympic and Paralympic Games - must be a world-class event.
I want us to get beyond what is normally thought of as a culture festival. The Olympiad has to tap into a real sense of national community. For the Live Sites initiative, we are going to try to get a big open-air screen in as many towns and cities as we can. London 2012 will be the first Olympic Games for the MySpace generation, so there will be a number of "routes in", in addition to the standard television coverage of the opening and closing ceremonies and the Games themselves.
Live Sites will not be simply a string of public venues at which people can watch the Olympics - they will also be temporary screens and stages for local arts performances and events. That is one incredibly simple way of allowing people all over the country to enjoy what is going on elsewhere. I want it to be rather like an extension of the hugely popular Proms in the Park idea, which has transformed the Last Night of the Proms from a televised concert at the Albert Hall to a genuinely interactive musical experience for cities up and down the country. I hope that Live Sites will become an entry point for everyone for both the Olympiad and, later, the Olympic and Paralympic Games themselves.
The Olympiad will also play to our obvious cultural strengths and heritage. The International Shakespeare Festival will provide a forum for modern interpretations using film, music and the visual arts. It is often said, and rightly so, that our language and literature are this country's greatest contributions to the culture of the world. So it seems only right that the greatest exponent of English should be centre stage when the world spotlight shines on the UK.
A nationwide International Museums Exhibition will give foreign curators the opportunity to reinterpret our national collections from a global perspective. In this way, our culture will be mirrored back to us through others' eyes, addressing questions such as: "What does our cultural heritage mean to the rest of the world?" and "How does the world view us?" I hope 2012 will be an opportunity to find new and interesting places to mount exhibitions that tell our island story in new ways and to new people.
These are only three of our ideas, and plenty more will be unveiled in the weeks and months to come. The Cultural Olympiad - like the Games themselves - must be the very best that we can all come up with. We've got the time and the resources to do it. The greatest show on earth is not just going to take place in the sports stadiums of Britain.
David Lammy MP is the minister for culture
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


2 comments
From our letters pages...
I have serious doubts about the value of the London Olympics to ordinary people, as opposed to big business which no doubt will do very nicely thanks out of it all. It is welcome news however that Culture Minister David Lammy has announced a Cultural Olympiad to run alongside the sporting events. I see that it is due to start in 2008 but in fact things can be done now. For a start the Minister could intervene the plans of Waltham Forest Council to 'modernise' [i.e wreck] the William Morris Gallery in Walthamstow. Not only is it the world's only museum dedicated to the great hirsute socialist it is also very much in the 2012 catchment area.
Keith Flett
I follow and work in arts with a keen interest of developing art beyound the usualy though of genre. Last year worked on an iinteresting project in the middle east which combined sport with art. Since 1982 sporting events that proclaim a supporting arts programm have not benefited increasing an audience or extending a market share. Neither has the art been able to extend the audience. Ever art programm has benefited in short term funding. I believe that money should be clearly marked for the future either for sport and it infrastructure or arts and the infrastructures to support that industry. Not shifting the source of funding for a short term limited sunset projects like a games project.
Jamie Henson