Return to: Home | World Affairs | Africa

Somalia nearing disaster

Jeremy Sare

Published 19 December 2008

Unthinkable as it may seem Somalia looks set to plunge into a wave of even greater chaos when Ethiopian and African Union troops withdraw later this month

The international community now seems resigned to Somalia’s status as the world’s most failed state yet - almost unimaginably - the country is perilously close to a wider human catastrophe.

6,500 Ethiopian and African Union troops are due to withdraw from Somalia at the end of this month. Their legacy will be a complete power vacuum which risks triggering an even fiercer civil war between the heavily armed factions riven by competing visions of extreme Islamic militancy.

The major world powers have only engaged again in the region because of a spate of pirate attacks in the Gulf of Aden. The possibility of unrestrained anarchy in Somalia has naturally heightened diplomatic activity on wider security issues in the Horn of Africa.

But the prospects for the Somali people look bleak from any perspective. Edward Mason of Independent Diplomat, said: “It’s a slow burn disaster largely ignored by the world’s media and governments – the result in large part of a catastrophically negligent international policy towards Somalia.”

UN resolution 1851, agreed this week, now permits any country to employ, “any means necessary” to pursue pirates on land and air. The emphasis of the international community’s response to Somalia is clearly still on force. The US could exert huge influence but since 2001 their agenda has not extended beyond what is deemed necessary action in the “war on terror”. They were strong supporters of the Ethiopian incursion into Somalia two years ago.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon has tried and failed to persuade 50 countries to lead or contribute to a peacekeeping force. There were hopes Turkey might volunteer but Ankara has now refused. Their reluctance is understandable; the UN has not even sent a reconnaissance mission to fully assess the security risk.

Somalia now looks too difficult a political issue for any power to resolve. The prospects for peace are as derelict as the ‘ghost capital’ of Mogadishu.

The current Transitional Federal Government (TFG) has never exerted anything like controlling power; what little they had is dwindling fast. The dominant military force of insurgents amongst the various splinter groups in southern central Somalia is Al-Shabab (or the ‘lads’). They have overrun several towns in recent weeks, including the strategic ports of Kismayo and Merca – they are now threatening Mogadishu.

Al-Shabab adhere to an extreme interpretation of Sharia; like the former Taliban Government in Afghanistan, they wield severe punishment for anyone indulging in the ‘un-Islamic’ activities of listening to music or watching a film. One local commentator blamed the US for the irresistible ascendancy of Al-Shabab: “America has created precisely the radicalised security threat they so feared."

Somalia already has the worst famine situation in the world. World Food Programme spokesman, Peter Smerdon, based in Nairobi, said: “The figures are very substantial. There are now 3.4 million Somalis entirely dependent on humanitarian aid. This year we have supplied 260,000 tonnes of food.”

Al-Shabab’s control of the main port for aid supply, Merca, makes the supply routes of food look increasingly precarious. Smerdon said, “so far their presence has not been affected the aid programme. We are impartial. We deal with the authorities on the ground whoever they are. Security is our biggest problem. Across Somalia, 33 aid-related workers have been killed since January. It’s been a bad year.”

The Human Rights Watch report, So Much to Fear published last week, sets out in chilling detail the oppression and degradation of the people of Somalia.

The author, Chris Albin-Lackey, provided ample evidence of casual murders carried out regularly by troops from the TFG as well the Ethiopian occupiers effectively acting in a “climate of impunity”.

Sally Healy of the international analysis organisation, Chatham House, said the future was, “unpredictable and negative,” but blamed the Ethiopian intervention itself for, “generating a terrible insurgency” and fuelling the “historical enmity” between the two countries.

The threat to the lives of the main population is clear; already one million people have been displaced, another million live abroad. More than 800,000 have left the capital since last year. The Dadaab refugee camp, just over the border in Kenya, holds over 220,000 people - about the same population as Derby.

The fragile democracy of the former British Protectorate of Somaliland in the north has also been targeted. Al-Shabab set off a series of co-ordinated suicide attacks in Hargeisa in October killing about 30.

Michael Walls of Somaliland Focus UK said: “It is high time western nations reconsidered their strategies and looked to support those bits of Somalia that are currently functioning. Otherwise, we risk once again losing those rare flickers of hope that have so long been extinguished as the developed world continues to blunder its way through the world's most protracted and profound 'national' political crisis.”

After the troops withdraw, a few sparks of hope may yet emanate from a new more, enlightened US presidency. Obama has a long list of international crises to unpick following eight years of Bush/Cheney unilateralism.

But not even Barack Obama, blessed with the unique presidential attributes of a constructive and collegiate view of international relations, combined with an East African heritage may be able to resolve the intractable problem of Somalia. After twenty years of bloody chaos there are no levers left to pull.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

10 comments from readers

alexxx
19 December 2008 at 21:54

Somalia needs to be left alone, ever sense the siad barre regime fell Ethiopia has been supporting different warlords to undermine strong Somali nation led by nationalist who want back the ogaden region, leave the Somalis alone to their issues

Riaz Ahmad
20 December 2008 at 02:35

UN resolution 1851 was devised to serve the needs of international shipping against Somali piracy, but the same international cummunity did not give a monkey about two other piracies, first the tipping of toxic waste in Somali waters and second the illegal fishing in Somali water. How can UN despense justice to one party and deny the same to the other. It is a classic example of might is right.

farahgiama
20 December 2008 at 03:05

When the natural progression or desruction of a state is interrupted , there's always a reprecussion and a price to pay. The USA seems the easiest to blame for everything that goes wrong anywhere in the world. There are too many cooks in the kitchen and the Saudis are the spoilers. No one seems to be able to stop the Shebaab. They are the best hope right now for Somalia. Let the show play itself out naturally.

Makhummud Omai
20 December 2008 at 20:03

I swear you people (a.k.a. "International policy specialists") have been having the same conversation about Somalia for 20 years. Why dont you ask why the Siadd Barre regime fell? And why every nation on Earth except Somalia is capable of forming some type of national authority?

You first instinct seems to always be to blame the U.S., and I agree its fun to blame America and I blame them often too just for kicks. But lets be real, this has been going on for 20 years, for 20 years Somalia has been unable to pull herself together....why? WHY IS ANY ONE FORCE UNABLE TO ASSUME POWER ON A NATIONAL SCALE IN SOMALIA?

Out of 190+ nations in the world, Somalia is one of the few that cant seem to put together a central authority. why? Its easy to blame interfering powers, but every nation has that same problem...how come they can still put together a government and Somalia cant? why is Somalia a special case?

There has been no answer to that yet.

farahgiama
20 December 2008 at 21:21

The Shebaab with all their faults seem to be capable, evenhanded and organized than the rest. They only need to shed their extreme radicalism and militancy and they can do this by stopping demonizing the west and see the Sa'udis for who theyreally are: the worst of the worst.

ikotubo
22 December 2008 at 19:52

Did Mr Sare say that Somalia was "nearing disaster"? Where has he been over the past 18 years or so (if not since it became a "country")? On planet Pluto? Because if he'd been on planet earth, he would have known that Somalia has never really been a country. At best, it was a mere fiefdom ruled by an assortment f brutes and crooks. Otherwise, it has been the hellish dystopia that we all witness today. And it is a lesson to what might happen in other African "countries" where the rulers (supported as ever by Western aid) put their self interests above those of their peoples; where the idea of civic responsibility is simply unheard of.

nawawimohamad
06 January 2009 at 09:20

Somalia is not a failed state. It is the US that has failed in its endeavour to control the country by supporting the present Somali government through its(US) proxy; Ethiopia. The US used Ethiopia because it is cheaper. This is infact one of the many failures by the US in their fight against terrorism. By the way, the so-called terrorists are also US made. Therefore the US is stcuck in the vicious cycle of its own making.

ikotubo
07 January 2009 at 21:09

Nawawimohamad: Let's keep the word "America" out of this debate, for the sake of basic rationality (and I hold no brief for them: goodness knows they have quite a lot to answer for all over the world).

Somalia, like other "countries" on my continent, is simply a casualty of its rulers' misrule. What you've described above (proxy wars, the Ethiopians, etc) are merely the natural consequences of that misrule.

cadiztocairo
08 January 2009 at 22:55

ikotubo - i think if you read Mr Sare's history of articles on Somalia & Somaliland both in NS and in The Guardian's Comment Is Free blogs you'll see that he is very aware of the crisis that has been Somalia ever since it's independence. Mr Sare is one of the few UK journalists to take any notice of the plight of the people of Somali and Somaliland and to urge the west and the UN to take some responsible steps to try to save the people from their plight at the hands of the brutes and crooks you refer to.

ikotubo
17 January 2009 at 21:55

Cadiztocairo: Thanks for your comment - and apologies for my late respose. I'm afraid I don't know Mr Sare as much as you obviously do. But I do not apologize for my earlier comment because it was a response to a view he expressed on this website.

At any rate, I should perhaps mention that like your good self, I dream of a day when the people of Somalia will have one effective, preferably democratic government, and even more importantly, one that is able to deliver economic development.

My concern, however, is that it's hard to see what outsiders can do to bring this desirable situation about. For example, as you must be aware, there have been countless initiatives aimed at forming a government there over the years, and none has succeeded. What more, precisely, can the international community do? Take over and run the country? With the level of anarchic violence there? Intervene militarily? The Americans and, subsequently, the African Union have tried and failed, and the Ethiopians have just been forced out. So even this has become a practical impossibility. At what stage should they be left to resolve their petty but violent clan-based feuds first before other people's sons and husbands pay with their lives in a fruitless attempt to get involved?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker