Return to: Home | World Affairs | Africa

The exodus

Xan Rice

Published 06 November 2008

The fighting in the Congo forces thousands to flee their homes, reports Xan Rice

Long walk to safety: a group of refugees flee as Tutsi rebels advance across North Kivu province, in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.

The exodus

Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: this picture could have come from 1994, when more than a million people fled over the border from Rwanda during the genocide. It could also have been taken at any time between 1998 and 2003, when the smoky hills and forests of the mineral-rich region became the theatre for what some called "Africa's First World War". Instead it was taken just last Monday near the eastern town of Kibumba, under the watch of a 17,000-strong UN force, the biggest anywhere in the world.

The swift advance towards the provincial capital Goma by Laurent Nkunda's Tutsi rebels, which caused more than 100,000 people to flee villages or camps, provoked panic in the west, with Britain, France and the US despatching envoys to the region. The UN secretary general, Ban Ki-m oon, warned of a humanitarian crisis of "catastrophic dimensions"; Gordon Brown said, hyperbolically, that Congo should not be allowed to become "another Rwanda".

To an outsider it might have seemed as if Nkunda's actions were something new, as if a long and carefully nurtured peace had suddenly been destroyed. But to those on the ground in North Kivu province, especially the one million people displaced there by fighting since 2006, it was just more of the same.

When Joseph Kabila was elected two years ago in the DRC's first democratic polls for more than 40 years, it was hoped that the myriad rebel forces in North Kivu would be persuaded to disarm. In January, after much arm-twisting, 22 armed groups, many of whom had benefited from controlling access to lucrative tin, gold and coltan mines, signed a peace deal with the government. But the swift disintegration of the agreement has shown that the ethnic roots of the problem grip too deep to be simply inked away.

Nkunda, a 41-year-old former Congolese army general who fought alongside the Rwandan Patriotic Front to liberate Rwanda after the genocide, claims to be defending the minority Tutsi population in eastern Congo from marauding Hutu militias. He blames, with some justification, the Congolese government for failing to disarm and even supporting Hutu rebels linked to the Rwanda genocide. Kabila, in turn, accuses Rwanda's president, Paul Kagame, of supporting Nkunda with arms and other logistical support. Kagame denies the charge, but most analysts believe it to be true.

The two leaders are expected to meet later this week. Unless their talks are vastly more successful than previous attempts, the picture archive of desperate civilians on the move in eastern Congo will continue to grow.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

3 comments from readers

Yasmine
06 November 2008 at 16:31

It is painfully clear that President Kabila and his government have failed utterly in their repeated insincere pledges to the people of DRC, the region and the international community to dislodge, disarm and repatriate the extremist Ex-FAR/Interahamwe/FDLR back to Rwanda where those accused of genocide would have to face justice for their crimes. The DRC government is simply not interested in breaking up with these genocidal forces. This failure to end collusion with criminals who committed genocide in Rwanda is not only a gross violation of human rights it is THE #1 CAUSE of the continued conflict and humanitarian disaster that has been occuring in the last 14 years and that has recently been brought to world attention yet again. What are more meetings going to achieve? Nothing really. If the international community were really serious about bringing peace to the great lakes region - the UN would be given the mandate to unilaterally round up, disarm and repatriate the genociders hiding out in the open in the DRC, supported by the Congolese government. This way for ONCE, the UN would get it right and render the region and the continent a REAL service.

Daniel
06 November 2008 at 16:57

I THINK THAT THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNAUTY HAS BEEN BACKING RWANDA AND PAUL KAGAME SINCE THE 1904 GENOCIDE.

HOW CAN YOU EXPLAIN THAT KAGAME HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO BUY THE WEPONS AND IN THE SAME TIME,DRC GOVERNMENT CANNOT BUY ANY !

HOW CAN DRC DEFEND HIS COUNTRY AGAINST THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNAUTY?

THIS IS INJUST.

ivor morgan
08 November 2008 at 11:28

It would be helpful if Mr Rice could help clear the fog away and name the trans-national companies which have substantial economic interests in the Congo.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker