Registered user login:

The burden of knowing too much history

Michela Wrong

Published 31 July 2008

If, as a westerner, you are going to visit Africa, the earlier in your life you do it, the better

A pretty, earnest young woman came up to me at the end of an African talk I recently chaired at the Royal Festival Hall. She wanted some advice. She had organised a trip to Rwanda with a group interested in development, but was experiencing some misgivings. Was she doing the right thing?

Absolutely, I answered, assuming she was worried about security. Eastern Congo, just across the border, might have fallen prey to rampaging militias, but rigidly policed Rwanda, Africa's version of Singapore, was a different matter. She should do the sensible thing, of course, and read the Foreign Office travel advis ory, but I doubted there was cause for concern.

No, security wasn't the issue. Puzzled, I hazarded another guess. Had someone sold her the familiar "tourists come and go but the locals never see any of the profits" line? It was one that I rejected, I said. They might not be immediately visible to the passing visitor, but the spill-off benefits of the tour industry went deep. Yet it seemed we were still talking at cross-purposes. "I've just been wondering," she said, "whether or not it's a morally appropriate thing to do."

I am still baffled as to what, precisely, was bothering this nice woman. Did she feel it was tasteless to act the tourist in a country that went through a genocide 14 years ago? Well, some might find visiting Rwanda's memorials en route to the mountain gorillas surreal, but slapping an economic boycott on a traumatised nation seems more like punishment than empathy.

I suspect she was simply giving expression to classic western liberal unease over the gaping north-south divide. Even before flying in, she could imagine what it would feel like to be sitting in her Land Cruiser, a carefully moisturised, well-fed, urban white woman, watching a skinny Rwandan peasant hoeing his plot in the sun. He would probably be sweating, the kids would certainly be snotty, and someone would probably beg for money. And she cringed.

The conversation confirmed an opinion that has crystallised over the past few years: if, as a westerner, you are going to visit Africa, the earlier in your life you do it, the better. By the time you are in your twenties, your head is so stuffed with preconceived opinions, mostly of the ethic ally self-flagellating variety, you can barely see, let alone interpret, what is going on outside you.

I suspect my earnest young woman felt that the only "appropriate" way to interact with Africa was to roll her sleeves up and start hammering a wall into place or digging a latrine. That is certainly what most British politicians do when they go to Africa. The charities that organise student gap years also seem to regard building schools in Vietnam and digging wells in Malawi as the best use of their volunteers' time. It's bizarre, when you think about it. The one thing the developing world has a surplus of is physical labour. Africans cut grass, dig ditches, lug wood and build shacks with a speed and skill that make western city-dwellers look like the ham-fisted, overeducated sophisticates they are. So why offer what is already there in abundance? Why rob the locals of the wages?

In stark contrast, consider the response of my 16-year-old niece, who just came with me on a fortnight's trip to Kenya and Tanzania, her first to Africa. I feared that already we might have left it too late. In fact, we got the timing just about right. She knew nothing about colonialism - it seems not to feature on the British history syllabus. She had no inkling of western culpability; nor had she imbibed the Oxfam and Christian Aid lessons on debt relief and trade reform.

She felt no ancestral guilt, no contorted need to compensate for the sins of her forefathers. Her questions and comments had the unmediated directness of someone genuinely looking, rather than telling themselves what to see.

"Gosh, if you're white here you really can't blend in" (as eyes swivelled to clock our arrival in an Arusha marketplace); "Maasais are really annoying" (after a series of over-pushy sales pitches from Rift Valley herdsmen); "Are all Kenyan policemen corrupt?" (after negotiating six highway roadblocks); and "Mangoes taste completely different here".

There was also, it has to be said: "I don't think I like having my things carried for me," harbinger of the guilt complex to come.

Later - I hope there will be a later - she can ponder where she stands on the legacy of empire and the thorny challenge of poverty alleviation. She will come to worry about how much to tip, fear she is sounding patronising, and smile far too much. But, at least, underneath all that new self-consciousness will lie a bedrock of spontaneity, unfiltered by received opinion.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

11 comments from readers

nawawimohamad
01 August 2008 at 09:02

Come on Michela, even if you are right you are still Wrong! Going to Africa for most of the whites is like going to the zoo. The whole of Africa is like a zoo to most of the europeans, as simple as that. In the eyes of the whites people in Africa are not humans they are some wild life creature in a big zoo!

MRM1967
01 August 2008 at 20:36

nawawimohamad -

Tourism is spectatorship. Any tourist anywhere in the world experiences the locals as a sight. Please explain the harm.

ikotubo
01 August 2008 at 20:51

What I don't understand is why Westerners always seem to consider it necessary to visit Africa - or more to the point, to want to "help" Africa. Don't they realize how very patronising this sort of interest actually is?

tnt22
01 August 2008 at 21:57

One cannot change history but hope to change the future. The only way is to visit Africa, enjoy the genuine hospitality of the people and take these thoughts back with you. Tell your friends and and change their opinion/stereotypes. Hopefully it will filter one day into a change in the UK foreign policy (which still has colonial aspects to it).

Pierre
02 August 2008 at 14:00

We have about 7 billion people inthe world. Leave the africans to their own devices.

arrtist
03 August 2008 at 15:48

Michela Wrong?

Wrong. I doubt Singaporeans' consider themselves "Asia's version of Rwanda"?

Where would such an analogy come from? Since Rwandans disposed of their problems enmasse, is she saying that Singapore would, given the opportunity, do the same?

arrtist

David Adams
04 August 2008 at 05:20

What in the world makes you think Black Americans are treated any different? My nephew went to Africa on his honeymoon - he was not hailed as a 'long-lost brother'. He was immediately identified as an AMERICAN and hit on for money. Stop playing the White victim - you are not alone!

Sharif
04 August 2008 at 10:03

I have visited Africa many times and love South Africa; we are pensioners and remain there for 3 months in winter, which is their summer. Very friendly people, blacks, whites and others. The weather is good and the rAnd is weak against our currencies. Problems? Yes they have many. They are more racists than elsewhere, but as tourists your main worry is law and order situation. the rest is for others to deal with.

kiddolucy
11 October 2008 at 21:38

Im in two minds about this article. I agree about the fact that british gap year students shouldnt really be building things when Africa is ace at labour.

But the idea that your eyes are somehow nicer if you have not read up on colonialism annoys me! Surely what is best is to learn to love everyone in any situation, regardles of national history.

If I didnt know, for example, that my friend was abused as a child, would I be a better friend to her? No! The challenge, as I said, is to treat people the the same - we're all children, we're all dependent, we all want something to eat and somewhere to stay.

Ignorance isnt bliss... loveing everyone is bliss. But if you find it easier to love when you dont know the full story, fair enough.

theexplorer
13 November 2008 at 15:49

Michela, I believe you are one of the very few people who deeply know Africa, I read one of your books with joy. I agree, visiting Africa is a good idea, epecially if you are keen to understand history from different perspectives, writings you can't find in the library. Explore Africa culturally, and socially..spend time with locals of all kinds, ask questions and get to know them. NOT a charity iniative thank you. And to you who wrote about Africans and Zoo, it only proves the level of your ignorance.Stay in your little comfort world, watching big brother would be the greatest achievemnt of your life. For you who are considering to visit Africa, start asking your African-decent neighbour for advise, it will be the trip of you lifetime. I had a friend who recently returned after spending few weeks there with a local, and he's already planning to go back next year..didn't have enough of it..

Camus
17 November 2008 at 16:00

Complete Jabbawocky! Surely the point about most

Afrcan countries is that they are the source of great

riches (for the Europeans ) and lucrative markets for

the world's armsmongers. Africa has been

despoiled and exploited for five hundred years and

the present leaders are the products of a caste

system that rewards the extended family while

making it almost impossible to survive without paying

out 'dash' to all who have any authority. I spent six

weeks in Nigeria some years ago. I met some

delightful, polite and cultivated people, saw the

grinding poverty of the stallkeepers and retailers and

despaired of the greed and dishonesty of the oil

comapnies, paying bribess to those in power and

exporting the national wealth as fast as they could.

Africa is doomed and the the wealthy countries are

the cause of the problems.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Michela Wrong

Michela Wrong has spent 13 years reporting on the African continent and is the author of two non-fiction books, "In the Footsteps of Mr Kurtz," about the Congolese dictator Mobutu, and "I didn't do it for you", about the Red Sea nation of Eritrea.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?