The rise of the flashpacker

Sponsored post: Some might call them cheats, Gap-yah sloane rangers or plastic poshos, but they are an ever increasing slice of the $1.4 trillion global travel industry. So who are flashpackers?

 Brought to you by BUPA

You won't find the word 'flashpacker' in the dictionary, but you can bet it's a term that is regularly bandied around the 'break out areas' of hip travel brands across the world. In brief, it describes a person who travels with the same intrepid and adventurous ethos of a regular backpacker, but who insists on adding comfort, style and continued access to technology to their exploration. Some might call them cheats, Gap-yah sloane rangers or plastic poshos, but they are an ever increasing slice of the $1.4 trillion global travel industry. So who are flashpackers? Where are they going? What 'luxuries' are they investing in? We explore the trend and see whether the traditional image of a rucksack-laden, tent-carrying globetrotter with no travel insurance is dying as the world gets smaller, and well, comfier.


What is a flashpacker?

A flashpacker is certainly someone with a little cash in their pocket, and at least some expectation of luxury while they're on the road. It's a person who would pay £100 for a short flight rather than getting the sweaty,  clapped out bus where you may have to share your seat with a chicken. They almost certainly travel with multi-trip insurance from someone like BUPA, and are more prepared for emergencies than travellers of previous decades.  A flashpacker will insist, rightly in most cases, that they're not all about five-star hotels, gourmet food and flashing the cash at every opportunity. But if a few extra quid will pay for a room with a nice view, a hotel with a pool or an upgrade on a long flight, then they're more than happy to get their wallet (or purse) out. It's something in the attitude, not necessarily the income bracket.


Who are flashpackers?

Flashpackers don't fit neatly into a certain demographic, much to the frustration of travel firms and their marketing departments. As we've already established, this is more about state of mind than state of bank account. Certainly these are people with a little extra cash or credit, but they're often more technologically savvy than most, happy to drag iPhones, digital cameras and laptops across the globe with them, and they tend to be people who are pressed for time in their normal lives. Hence taking flights rather than buses or trains, and careful planning of accommodation and itineraries using apps like TripIt. But flashpackers will find the time to tweet and blog about their exploits to the folks back home of course.


They may be retired types who are still young at heart, and feel the pull of destinations that their kids have rhapsodised about, or they may be students who've worked two jobs to spend the summer wild swimming in Brazil. What unites them all is that they're independent-minded travellers for whom the thought of a package holiday is anathema, but would seek out that little boutique hotel and the hip pop-up serving the best local food.


Where do flashpackers go?

The easy answer is you can flashpack anywhere in the world, but there are definite trends in terms of destinations well suited to the average flashpacker. Travel blogger Flashpackerguy, suggests that places where relative luxury can be found cheaply lend themselves to the daring flashpacker. So Indonesia would be on the list rather than Vietnam and Thailand, both because of its natural beauty and the fact you can stay in a five-star hotel for £60 a night. Peru would be chosen over South American neighbours Colombia and Ecuador because of its more defined and great value cuisine. And if the flashpacker has the correct travel insurance, then a trip across India might be on the cards, with its wealth of new experiences and sporadic ex-colonial splendour.


The cost of flashpacking

So how much is this costing our flashpackers? Well a survey by the travel company The Flash Pack, suggested that some 30-something, professional flashpackers might spend up to £3,000 before they even leave their home. Splurging money on digital devices to keep in touch and record their foreign adventure, trendy clothing for the trip, and plenty of cosmetics to make sure they look fresh at all times, will all add up. And that's before you factor in the rooftop pool bars and private beach access.


The future of travel 

So what does the future hold? Is the traditional concept of the backpacker exploring the world with nothing but a map, compass and Shewee dead as a Dodo? Well, not quite. Lonely Planet has stated that there will always be travellers that enjoy roughing it, trekking through remote areas with little plan or resource. And yet, there is statistical evidence that the flashpackers are on the rise. Some destinations like Sri Lanka have recorded an 80% growth in the 'informal' accommodation sector, covering independent, boutique hotels. It's clear that as our expectations of comfort, service and connectivity have increased in our day-to-day lives, our travel aspirations have also shifted, with more of us demanding that little bit extra.



A year on from the Spending Review, the coalition's soothsayer has emerged to offer another gloomy economic prognosis. Asked by ITV News whether he could promise that there wouldn't be a double-dip recession, Vince Cable replied: "I can't do that.

David Cameron addresses pupils at an assembly during a visit to Corby Technical School on September 2, 2015. Photograph: Getty Images.
Show Hide image

Can Cameron maintain his refugee stance as he comes under attack from all sides?

Tory MPs, the Sun, Labour and a growing section of the public are calling on the PM to end his refusal to take "more and more". 

The disparity between the traumatic images of drowned Syrian children and David Cameron's compassionless response ("I don't think there is an answer that can be achieved simply by taking more and more refugees") has triggered a political backlash. A petition calling for greater action (the UK has to date accepted around 5,000) has passed the 100,000 threshold required for the government to consider a debate after tens of thousands signed this morning. Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson has tweeted: "This is not an immigration issue, it's a humanitarian one, and the human response must be to help. If we don't, what does that make us?" Tory MPs such as Nicola Blackwood, David Burrowes, Jeremy Lefroy and Johnny Mercer have similarly appealed to Cameron to reverse his stance.

Today's Sun declares that the UK has "a proud record of taking in desperate people and we should not flinch from it now if it is beyond doubt that they have fled for their lives." Meanwhile, the Washington Post has published a derisive piece headlined "Britain takes in so few refugees from Syria they would fit on a subway train". Labour has called on Cameron to convene a meeting of Cobra to discuss the crisis and to request an emergency EU summit. Yvette Cooper, who led the way with a speech on Monday outlining how the UK could accept 10,000 refugees, is organising a meeting of councils, charities and faith groups to discuss Britain's response. Public opinion, which can turn remarkably quickly in response to harrowing images, is likely to have grown more sympathetic to the Syrians' plight. Indeed, a survey in March found that those who supported accepting refugees fleeing persecution outnumbered opponents by 47-24 per cent. 

The political question is whether this cumulative pressure will force Cameron to change his stance. He may not agree to match Cooper's demand of 10,000 (though Germany is poised to accept 800,000) but an increasing number at Westminster believe that he cannot remain impassive. Surely Cameron, who will not stand for election again, will not want this stain on his premiership? The UK's obstinacy is further antagonising Angela Merkel on whom his hopes of a successful EU renegotiation rest. If nothing else, Cameron should remember one of the laws of politics: the earlier a climbdown, the less painful it is. 

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.