Muhammad survived Dante’s Inferno. He’ll survive a YouTube clip

Like freedom, tolerance is not a western invention or innovation; it is an Islamic virtue.

A Pakistani student holds a placard during a protest
A Pakistani student holds a placard during a protest against the controversial film 'Innocence of Muslims'. Photograph: Getty Images

Dear Muslim protester,

Where do I begin? Having watched you shout and scream in front of the world’s television cameras, throw petrol bombs and smash windows, I reluctantly decided to write this open letter to you.

Let me be blunt: you and I have little in common other than our shared Islamic faith, our common belief that there is no God but God and Muhammad is His Messenger. You live in a Muslim-majority country, where religion (or should that be religious extremism?) defines the boundaries of political debate and the limits of free speech; I was born and brought up in the liberal, secular west as a member of a minority Muslim community.

If I’m honest, I have to say that, listening to your belligerent rhetoric and watching your violent behaviour, I struggle to recognise the Islam in which you profess to believe. My Islamic faith is based on the principles of peace, moderation and mercy; it revolves around the Quranic verses “There is no compulsion in religion” (2:256) and “Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion” (109:6). Yours is a faith disfigured by anger, hate and paranoia.

Self-control

Please do not misunderstand me: yes, you have every right to be angry. I have no time for those neoconservatives here in the west who airily dismiss “false grievances” in the Middle East and beyond. Muslims have much to be aggrieved over – from Bagram to Guantanamo Bay, from Abu Ghraib to Haditha, from US soldiers urinating on the Quran to the spate of racist films and cartoons depicting our beloved prophet as a terrorist/murderer/paedophile/rapist/ delete-as-applicable.

Anger, however, is not an excuse for extremism. Have you not read this saying by the Prophet? “The strong is not the one who overcomes the people by his strength, but the strong is the one who controls himself while in anger.”

Today, 14 centuries later, too many of us seem to have lost all self-control. Your fanatical counterparts on the Christian evangelical right have a phrase they often deploy: “WWJD”, or “What would Jesus do?”. Perhaps you and your fellow protesters should ask “WWMD”: what would Muhammad do? Would the Prophet endorse your violent attacks on foreign embassies and schools, on police stations and shops?

We both know the answer. As a child, you will have been taught, like me, about how Muhammad was verbally and physically abused by the pagan worshippers of Mecca – but never responded in kind. The Quran calls him a “mercy for all of creation”.

But your anger has blinded you. You tell foreign reporters you are protesting against injustice – but the fight for justice begins at home. Where were you and your fellow flag-burners when a poor, 14-year-old Christian girl in Pakistan was arrested on trumped-up charges of “blasphemy” in August and threatened with the death penalty? Where are you today when the Syrian regime continues to wage war against its own (Muslim) people? Why do you not protest outside the embassies of the Bahraini regime, which tortures and tear-gasses its (Muslim) citizens?

You say you love the Prophet and cannot bear to see him abused, yet in Saudi Arabia the house of the Prophet’s first wife, Khadija, was flattened to make way for a public toilet, while the house where Muhammad was born is now overshadowed by a royal palace. Where is your rage against the Saudi regime? Or is your selfprofessed love for the Prophet just a cynical expression of crude anti-Americanism?

You and I have long complained of the west’s double standards in the Middle East; it is time for us to recognise that Muslims are guilty of equally egregious double standards. Egyptian state television has broadcast a series based on the infamous anti-Semitic forgery The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Pakistani television channels regularly air programmes demonizing the country’s Ahmadiyya community. Islamic scholars appear in online videos ridiculing the core beliefs of Judaism and Christianity. Yet you and your allies demand special protection for your religion and your prophet. Why? Is your faith so weak, so brittle? Muhammad, lest we forget, survived Dante’s Inferno. Trust me, he’ll survive a 14-minute clip on YouTube.

Own goal

Perhaps the greatest irony, and tragedy, is that by publicising the online insults directed at the Prophet, you have given the wretched “Sam Bacile”, the maker of the offensive movie, and his Islamophobic, evangelical Christian ally, Steve Klein, a victory they could never have achieved on their own. Need I remind you that when the full-length film, Innocence of Muslims, was released earlier this year, it was shown only once, to an audience of fewer than ten people, at a run-down cinema in California?

Meanwhile, the reputational damage done to our faith – exacerbated, I hasten to add, by lazy journalists in the west who cannot seem to distinguish between Islam and its adherents – has been immense. Have you not seen the cover of Newsweek magazine? “Muslim rage”, screams the headline.

But I have some (bad) news for you (and, for that matter, Newsweek). You represent no one but yourself. You do not speak for Islam or for the Prophet. Nor are you representative of the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims. In a recent Gallup survey conducted in ten Muslim-majority countries, representing more than 80 per cent of the global Muslim population, believers, when asked what they admired most about the west, cited political freedoms, fair trials and . . . wait for it . . . freedom of speech.

Your actions undermine not just the great religion of Islam but a worldwide Muslim community, or umma, whose members want to live in peace and freedom despite the provocations from the bigots, phobes and haters.

Like freedom, tolerance is not a western invention or innovation; it is an Islamic virtue. As the great Muslim caliph Ali ibn Abu Talib once wrote: “Remember that people are of two kinds: they are either your brothers in religion or your brothers in mankind.”

Yours faithfully, Mehdi.

Mehdi Hasan is an NS contributing writer and the political director of Huffington Post UK.

45 comments

Harry Alffa's picture

It's the "dishonesty meme".
From footballers, "having a right to fall down there", to Miliband proposing a repeat of the bankers' bonus tax; it's all just dishonesty, but its delivered with and apparent sincerity of belief or sense of "fairness", but its based on dishonesty.

The Arab Spring revealed a "very sophisticated" (although that sounds patronising) muslim populace. Does that population really expect people to believe that they actually think that any government is responsible for what gets uploaded to YouTube?

What would Muhammad do?
He would look you, the protester, in the eye and call you a liar.

What's that reply you give? You genuinely believe the US government had a hand in the offensive YouTube video?
Then Muhammad would look you in the eye and declare you a moron.

Agoodword's picture

Unfortunately, the typical Muslim protesters won't be reading your fair plea Mehdi.

However, your recollection of this unsavory event, one which you only touched upon, does highlight the deep ignorance and hypocrisy that exists amongst many western commentators and public, many of whom, I'm sure will be reading your riposte.

Some, as reactions to this article will show, are condemned to a position of bigotry and hatred.

1.6 billion Muslims are deeply offended by this film, but 1.6 billion Muslims are not demonstrating mindlessly. Not even 1%(15 million) are ventilating their offense and anger in this manner, and yet, we have no shortage of derisive headlines and commentary about ISLAM and MUSLIMS.

Why isn't the peaceful and just indignation of 99.9999+% of the Muslims representative of Islam and Muslims. Unfortunately some have allowed their view of the world to be shaped totally by news headlines, a prism that is hardly wholesome to a fair mind.

This isn't about the depiction of the Prophet as is constantly mentioned, it's about depicting the prophet with malicious and vile caricatures, which anyone with a modicum of knowledge about the life of Muhammed knows is utterly false.

If you believe otherwise, you have to explain how you know what you know about Muhammed and Islam, if are not using Islamic sources. And if you are using Islamic sources, you may come to different conclusions about many things in Islam, but you will never come to a conclusion that depraves the character of Muhammed. Monotheism and the virtue of Muhammed,are the two things which every one of the billions of souls that claimed to be Muslims agree upon.

Some in the West, condemned to only view the world through the prism of aggressive secularism, fail to understand what Muhammed represents to Muslims. He is a paragon of virtue and the fact they he is invested with attributes of extreme, forgiveness, kindness, compassion, sacrifice and mercy is a clear testament to how Muslims imagine the ideal personification of Man. Whether anyone contests these virtues of Muhammed has no relevance. 1.6 billion people see the best of man in Muhammed and thats what matters.

The natural pain any person feels when ones parents or loved ones are scandalously vilified and lied against, Muslims feel this and more for Muhammed.

DMyers's picture

Cue pages and pages of pro-Zionist vitriol from Julia Harris...

JJJ's picture

@Dim Ears: That's your comment? What wisdom!

A Realist's picture

Some people in charge in Islamist countries and in some cases, those in charge of teaching Islam are distorting the message. No, religious teachers shouldn't hit kids or persecute them if they turn out gay, or decide not to follow Islam or have women stoned when they are raped. This is where the hatred is bred. Add a few western bombs, poverty and lack of education and wow- a potent mixture. Yet whilst in rural areas, say in Afghanistan one can understand this ideology being potent, why is there a revival of extreme Islam in western muslims? There is a faction that will not even allow the discussion of evolution in the UK and there are others that are openly vocal about their hatred of non muslims. This is not the majority, but it easily proliferates and is a cancer like the far right. Who is speaking up for Islam in the UK? Choudray? George Galloway? With self aggrandising spokes'men' like these, Islam is doomed to being tarnished. It's obvious they are both in it for the fees they get from the bbc, and various other places for being Islam the brand. Indeed any hope of moderate Islam is often taken away by the way muslims choose such awful people as their voice (when they actually have a choice of course). It seems that Islam has stopped being a scholarly religion of debate and peace and is being turned in to a farce for the west to poke fun at. This is in part deliberate, as it keeps the many muslims in a perpetual state of weakness, so they are not in control of their own countries. Many saudi and iranian playboys that spend their muslim brothers gdp in the western world love this. They get the oil money to spend on football, drink and women. Yet at home they are discussing the next minority to suppress and the people in awe of punishment authorised by religion, adhere to this mob rule. In Parkistan they blow up and kill each other, it seems, everytime somebody tries to live a normal life. Weddings are trashed, musicians are harmed, books are banned. Anybody that mentions religious tolerance is killed. Unfortunately, in the case of Egypt, moderate voices are not being heard, even when there is opportunity for muslims to prosper in the future. Like football hooligans, some extremists need therapy and to stop the hating. I've spoken with many muslims at university and at times i'm absolutely amazed at their views. Religion seems to encourage self abnegation. Many seemed much nicer people than myself, but often quite naive about their rights as individuals and obsessed with what their parents and religion had told them and wouldn't dare break from the control. I hadn't experienced such fear of religion since i read a book on catholic childhood upbringings. Is all this religion healthy? The west seems to be playing on this weakness that some muslims have to never allow scholarly debate, analysis or criticism of their religion and rather than empowering them, it is making them ripe for exploitation.

Latest tweets