The meaning of the F-word: Trafficking
Louise Mensch, MP for Corby (Conservative)
By Louise Mensch Published 08 March 2012
Does our male-dominated society understand what rape means? All too often, it appears not. The incredible violation of having your body pierced by a stranger, without your consent, stays with its victim for ever. A single rape can and does shatter lives for years afterwards. Yet activities in which women and girls are raped not once but over and over again attract ludicrously low sentences. Google the sentencing guidelines for human trafficking and be profoundly depressed by the language, the maximum sentences and the examples. Trafficking for sexual exploitation – sentence not to exceed 14 years. Trafficking in prostitution – sentence not to exceed 14 years. Of course, we know such sentences are halved in practice.
The Crown Prosecution Service guidelines give sentencing examples for the most egregious cases – a man repeatedly trafficked a 15-year-old girl into "prostitution", selling her over and over again to different men. His sentences totalled 18 years only. For how many rapes, for how much horror, for this minor? Nor was she involved in prostitution, which is the voluntary selling of sex by an adult woman. She was a child who was gang-raped. "Sold for multiple gang rapes at 15" would have been accurate. For this, the man did not even get life.
In another "extremely serious" case, multiple offences against "women and young girls" involving "prostitution" (or gang rape) merited 23 years in total. How many women, how many children, how many rapes to get that mere 23 years? How many months or weeks per rape?
Let the police, the CPS, the courts and politicians recognise what sexual trafficking is and the difference between prostitution and gang rape. It is part of the overall culture of hand-washing on sexual violence against women. Traffickers are slavers and rapists and they should go to prison for their entire lives, in recognition of the lives of the girls and women they have stolen.
Next: Frances O'Grady
Previous: Liz Jones
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


3 comments
It is well within the rights of anyone to make a complaint that they feel is worthy of discussion. What truly determines the conversational value of a topic is whether or not anyone responds to it. In essence, it is only my response (and future responses) that validate your words here projekty rodinnych domov. If no one reads and no one cares, then you might as well have been speaking to yourself.
Shame you had to define rape as having your body pierced *by a stranger*, Louse. I think you need to brush up on your rape myths: http://www.mumsnet.com/campaigns/we-believe-you-campaign-rape-myths-busted
It's not only rape when it's someone you don't know.
You are quite right. In writing this piece rather emotively (and fast) I focussed on the alienation felt by a woman invaded by 'the other' without consent. I did not mean to imply, as it certainly reads, that only strangers can rape. Husbands, fathers, boyfriends, friends and acquaintances can and do rape on a regular basis and the harm done is in the act, whoever is responsible for the violation. Thank you for picking that up.