Morning call: the pick of the papers

The ten must-read pieces from this morning's papers.

1. There is a new, unexpected feeling in Scotland: a pity for the state of England (Guardian)

At the moment, from the Scottish perspective, England looks a more fractious, turbulent and uncertain society, writes Ian Jack.

2. Our legacy of 9/11 was a dictatorial and dysfunctional government (Independent)

The reason why half the Cabinet didn't know it was at war was that the Iraq engagement was being run exclusively by Downing Street, says Andreas Whittam Smith.

3. Look upon Blair's mighty works - and despair (Times) (£)

As the great showman dog-whistles for change in Iran, we should never forget how little he actually achieved, says Matthew Parris.

4. Investigative journalism must not be criminalised (Guardian)

Police questioning of journalists such as the Guardian's Amelia Hill who seek to uncover corruption is a worrying trend, says Heather Brooke.

5. Barack Obama needs to find the steel to match the rhetoric (Independent)

Too often of late, Mr Obama has given the impression of caving in to Republican pressure, of being a President adrift, says this leading article.

6. Post 9/11 America has become the land of the fearful (Telegraph)

The lasting damage of the al-Qaeda terrorist attacks has been to the mindset of the Americans and their economy, writes Neil Tweedie.

7. The deluded decade (Daily Mail)

After 9/11 our inadequate leaders plunged us into disastrous wars while ignoring the great economic challenges of our time, writes Dominic Sandbrook.

8. Planning fiasco adds insult to injury to the Tory faithful (Financial Times)

Echoing this week's New Statesman cover story, Max Hastings argues that developers occupy a place in the demonology of middle England more prominent than bankers.

9. Now we have to rely on the right to fight the feral rich (Guardian)

Let's hear it for Charles Moore, the Spectator and FT, writes John Harris. Their attacks on the feral elite contrast with a virtually silent Labour

10. The day US shock and awe rained on Tehran (Times) (£)

A war with Iran in alliance with Saddam Hussein. How different would the world be if 9/11 had never happened, asks Simon Sebag Montefiore?

ELLIE FOREMAN-PECK FOR NEW STATESMAN
Show Hide image

Craig Oliver, Cameron's attack dog, finally bites

A new book reveals the spiteful after life of Downing Street's unlikely spin doctor.

It must be hard being a spin doctor: always in the shadows but always on-message. The murky control that the role requires might explain why David Cameron’s former director of communications Craig Oliver has rushed out his political memoirs so soon after his boss left Downing Street. Now that he has been freed from the shackles of power, Oliver has chosen to expose the bitterness that lingers among those on the losing side in the EU referendum.

The book, which is aptly titled Unleashing Demons, made headlines with its revelation that Cameron felt “badly let down” by Theresa May during the campaign, and that some in the Remain camp regarded the then home secretary as an “enemy agent”. It makes for gripping reading – yet seems uncharacteristically provocative in style for a man who eschewed the sweary spin doctor stereotype, instead advising Cameron to “be Zen” while Tory civil war raged during the Brexit campaign.

It may be not only politicians who find the book a tough read. Oliver’s visceral account of his side’s defeat on 24 June includes a description of how he staggered in a daze down Whitehall until he retched “harder than I have done in my life. Nothing comes up. I retch again – so hard, it feels as if I’ll turn inside out.”

It’s easy to see why losing hit Oliver – who was knighted in Cameron’s resignation honours list – so hard. Arguably, this was the first time the 47-year-old father-of-three had ever failed at anything. The son of a former police chief constable, he grew up in Scotland, went to a state school and studied English at St Andrews University. He then became a broadcast journalist, holding senior posts at the BBC, ITV and Channel 4.

When the former News of the World editor Andy Coulson resigned as No 10’s communications director in January 2011 because of unceasing references in the press to his alleged involvement in the phone-hacking scandal, Oliver was not the obvious replacement. But he was seen as a scandal-free BBC pen-pusher who exuded calm authority, and that won him the job. The Cameron administration, tainted by its association with the Murdoch media empire, needed somebody uncontroversial who could blend into the background.

It wasn’t just Oliver’s relative blandness that recommended him. At the BBC, he had made his name revamping the corporation’s flagship News at Ten by identifying the news angles that would resonate with Middle England. The Conservatives then put this skill to very good use during their 2015 election campaign. His broadcast expertise also qualified him to sharpen up the then prime minister’s image.

Oliver’s own sense of style, however, was widely ridiculed when he showed up for his first week at Downing Street looking every inch the metropolitan media male with a trendy man bag and expensive Beats by Dre headphones, iPad in hand.

His apparent lack of political affiliation caused a stir at Westminster. Political hacks were perplexed by his anti-spin attitude. His style was the antithesis of the attack-dog mode popularised by Alastair Campbell and Damian McBride in the New Labour years. As Robert Peston told the Daily Mail: “Despite working closely with Oliver for three years, I had no clue about his politics or that he was interested in politics.” Five years on, critics still cast aspersions and question his commitment to the Conservative cause.

Oliver survived despite early wobbles. The most sinister of these was the allegation that in 2012 he tried to prevent the Daily Telegraph publishing a story about expenses claimed by the then culture secretary, Maria Miller, using her links to the Leveson inquiry as leverage – an accusation that Downing Street denied. Nevertheless, he became indispensable to Cameron, one of a handful of trusted advisers always at the prime minister’s side.

Newspapers grumbled about Oliver’s preference for broadcast and social media over print. “He’s made it clear he [Oliver] doesn’t give a s*** about us, so I don’t really give a s*** about him,” a veteran correspondent from a national newspaper told Politico.

Yet that approach was why he was hired. There was the occasional gaffe, including the clumsy shot of a stern-looking Cameron, apparently on the phone to President Obama discussing Putin’s incursion into Ukraine, which was widely mocked on Twitter. But overall, reducing Downing Street’s dependence on print media worked: Scotland voted against independence in 2014 and the Tories won a majority in the 2015 general election.

Then came Brexit, a blow to the whole Cameroon inner circle. In his rush to set the record straight and defend Cameron’s legacy – as well as his own – Oliver has finally broken free of the toned-down, straight-guy persona he perfected in power. His memoir is spiteful and melodramatic, like something straight from the mouth of Malcolm Tucker in The Thick of It. Perhaps, with this vengeful encore to his mild political career, the unlikely spin doctor has finally fulfilled his potential. 

This article first appeared in the 29 September 2016 issue of the New Statesman, May’s new Tories