Clive Goodman's letter to News International
"This practice was widely discussed in the daily editorial conference, until explicit reference to it was banned by the Editor."
By Staff blogger Published 16 August 2011
Group Human Resources Director
News International
1 Virginia Street
London E198 1HR
March 2, 2007
Dear Mr Cloke,
Re: Notice of termination of employment
I refer to Les Hinton's letter of February 5 2007 informing me of my dismissal for alleged gross misconduct.
The letter identifies the reason for the dismissal as "recent events". I take this to mean my plea of guilty to conspiracy to intercept the voicemail messages of three employees of the royal family.
I am appealing against this decision on the following grounds:
i -- The decision is perverse in that the actions leading to this criminal charge were carried out with the full knowledge and support of [BLANKED OUT]. Payment for Glen (sic) Mulcaire's services was arranged by [BLANKED OUT].
ii -- The decision is inconsistent, because [BLANKED OUT] and other members of staff were carrying out the same illegal procedures. The prosecution counsel, the counsel for Glen (sic) Mulcaire, and the Judge at the sentencing hearing agreed that other News of the World employees were the clients for Mulcaire's five solo substantive charges. This practice was widely discussed in the daily editorial conference, until explicit reference to it was banned by the Editor. As far as I am aware, no other member of staff has faced disciplinary action, much less dismissal.
iii -- My conviction and imprisonment cannot be the real reason for my dismissal. The legal manager, Tom Crone, attended virtually every meeting of my legal team and was given full access to the Crown Prosecution Service's evidence files. He, and other senior staff of the paper, had long advance knowledge that I would plead guilty. Despite this, the paper continued to employ me. Throughout my suspension, I was given book serialisations to write and was consulted on several occasions about royal stories they needed to check. The paper continued to employ me for a substantial part of my custodial sentence.
iv -- Tom Crone and the editor promised on many occasions that I could come back to a job at the newspaper if I did not implicate the paper or any of its staff in my mitigation plea. I did not, and I expect the paper to honour its promise to me.
v -- The dismissal is automatically unfair as the company failed to go through the minimum required statutory dismissal procedures.
Yours sincerely,
Clive Goodman
cc Stuart Kuttner, Managing Editor, News of the World
Les Hinton, Executive Chairman, News International Ltd
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

3 comments
Free agent RB Ricky Williams has found the third team in his career he will play for -- the Baltimore Ravens. Multiple reports say Williams decided on joining the Ravens after leaving the Miami Dolphins in free agency. He can earn up to $4 million on the two-year deal. Ricky Williams will wear Ricky Williams Ravens Jersey 34 and play for Baltimore Ravens next season. Everyone knows Ricky's story. He was picked fifth overall by the New Orleans Saints in the 1999 NFL draft. He wore Custom NFL Jerseys and stayed in New Orleans for three seasons before moving onto the Dolphins in 2002 and putting in an All-Pro season with 1,853 rushing yards. He wore Authentic NFL Jerseys and lead the league in rushing in both 2002 and 2003. From there things went...down hill. He did not play in any games in 2004 and 2006, and played in just 13 total games from 2004-07. The Ravens lost veteran RB Willie McGahee in free agency this year so Williams likely fills that role as a complement to RB Ray Rice. He has had a strange career but Williams is a solid signing in this situation for the Ravens. You can log on our Online NFL Shop and select our best quality Ricky Williams Ravens Jersey 34 and Baltimore Ravens Jerseys if you are true fans of Baltimore Ravens.
The best bit of fiction I have read since 'the simples life'
Never put anything in writing! Handwriting, print or electronic image are all evidence in the legal sense of the word. Could get you up to four years!
CCTV evidence is even better. The culprit's mum might even turn him in!
X
Post new comment