The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Tebbit: "Bercow is no Tory"

A one-time party chairman's tacit Ukip endorsement.

Some of my best friends are Speakers, insisted Norman Tebbit today, before declaring open season on John Bercow and his attempts to keep the UK Independence Party's Nigel Farage at bay.

I paraphrase. Here's what Tebbit actually told BBC1's Politics Show:

I remain a friend of John's and I have been for 20-odd years . . . He did cast himself in my mould, indeed. But he has been reworked in recent years. I don't think he would really be able to describe himself as a Conservative any more, even if he were not the Speaker.

And so to the forthcoming election battle for the Buckingham seat that will see Farage defy convention and take on a sitting speaker. Tebbit, not for the first time putting himself at odds with David Cameron, told the programme:

There is not a Conservative candidate, so they have to look around. And they will make a choice.

I don't think it's any business of the Conservative Party to instruct even its activists and members in who they should vote for in that sense, or indeed campaign for.

As my colleague George Eaton has noted, Bercow is defending the largest Tory majority in the country, so is more than likely to see off Farage, with or without the implied endorsement of a one-time Conservative Party chairman and current star of the blogosphere.

Nor will it do Cameron any harm, in the country at large, to be seen to be in opposition to an "old-school" Tory.

And yet Tebbit's apparent preference for Ukip's man over the modernising Bercow does speak to large sections of the Conservative Party. And not just the grass roots.

For starters -- as our political correspondent James Macintyre reported earlier this year -- there's a small right-wing parliamentary cabal actively plotting to oust Bercow. Moreover, wannabe Conservative MPs remain dogmatically Eurosceptic.

Take this finding from the recent New Statesman/ComRes poll of 101 prospective parliamentary candidates:

Seventy-two per cent agree that as a matter of priority, Britain needs a fundamental renegotiation of its relationship with the European Union.

Despite David Cameron's post-"cast-iron guarantee" words about the Lisbon Treaty, it is fanciful to believe that the Tory leadership shares the view that renegotiation is a "matter of priority".

The grass roots have just scored a notable victory -- Conservative Central HQ has acceded to their wishes and approved strong immigration messages for campaigning in marginal seats.

As the opinion polls narrow, will the calls from Tebbit and co prove equally irresistible?

Follow the New Statesman team on Twitter.

5 comments

Phoenix One UK's picture

Tebbit is putting country before party, and he is not the first to do so. Follow the long list of defections from both the Tory and Labour camps to UKIP. Even UKIP put country before party, twice. First Farage and then Lord Pearson gave Cameron a proposal that UKIP would not contest the general election if he - if winning government - would give the British people an in/out referendum on EU, and Cameron refused twice.
My vote goes to the party that best represents the interest of my country, the UK, and that is UKIP.

George Mitrovich's picture

Ah, Norman Tebbit, still at it I see. The gentleman is nothing if not consistent.

It's quite unfair to suggest that you can tell one's politics by their face, but in Tebbit's case the point is there to be made -- withdrawn, elongated and tight, just like most UKIP policies.

British conservatism is mostly different from that in the U.S., but maybe not when it comes to the UKIP.

From over here, on the left side of the Pond, one could see Tebbit championing Sarah Palin, who’s no where near Tebbit’s intellectual equal, but then neither was Ms Thatcher.

Of course, before that could happen, Tebbit would have to explain to Governor Palin who he is, and that do doubt would prove a challenge.

If Tebbit were to quote to the governor something he said a while ago, "The word conservative is used by the…as a portmanteau word of abuse for anyone whose views differ from the insufferable, smug, sanctimonious, naive, guilt-ridden, wet, pink orthodoxy of that sunset home of the third-rate minds of that third-rate decade, the nineteen-sixties”, she would have no clue.

Having not looked in recently on Brit politics, it’s nice to know upon coming back that some things remain unchanged. So thank you, Norman Tebbit.

George Mitrovich
San Diego

Voice of Reason's picture

Tebbit is wrong again as John Bercow has the support of both David Cameron and the President of Buckingham Conservatives in the forthcoming election. As a member of Buckingham Conservatives I will be proud to be supporting John Bercow at the election when it comes and I think it is a measure of John's stature as a politician that he will be actively supported by prominent Labour and Liberal Democrat politicians. We dont need carpetbaggers in Buckingham.

David's picture

Norman speaks sense as usual. Just needs to go that bit further and cut the mooring ropes to Cameron's Tory party.

Valentine Smith's picture

It's not too late, we need everyone who supports what the the Conservatives really should be to come out and support UKIP. Lord Tebbit, other obviously very disillusioned Conservatives, newspapers, bloggers, support what you believe in, not some tired old party, who might just about win the most seats, when if they had anything about them should be romping home.

I am UKIP PPC for Herefordshire South and all the feedback I get tells me that if a few big names, actually come over to us, then we will get some Westminster seats and then we really can make a difference.

Latest tweets