Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

Crisis for Obama as Republicans take Massachusetts

Shock victory in Ted Kennedy's old seat could end hopes of healthcare reform

The Republicans have pulled off a shock victory by winning the Massachusetts Senate seat left vacant by the Democrat Ted Kennedy's death.

The result, in what is usually one of the safest Democratic seats in the country, is a severe blow to Barack Obama's presidency and throws into doubt the future of his health-care reform plan. The defeat robs the Democrats of the 60-seat "super-majority" that allows them to overcome Republican filibusters in the 100-member US Senate.

The Republican candidate, Scott Brown, beat Martha Coakley, the state attorney general, who had expected to inherit the seat, by 52 per cent to 47 per cent. In his victory speech he promised to use his Senate vote to defeat the Democrats' health-care reform.

He said: "One thing is clear: voters do not want the trillion-dollar health-care bill that is being forced on the American people. This bill is not being debated openly and fairly. It will raise taxes, hurt Medicare, destroy jobs, and run our nation deeper into debt.

"In health care, we need to start fresh, work together, and do the job right."

 

Follow the New Statesman team on Twitter

Tags: Politics News

1 comment

writeon1's picture

"Reform" is the most misused word in the political dictionary. When politicians and their servants use the word, it invariably means the exact opposite of what the word actually means, and how most people understand it.

The American healthcare system is not being reformed. It is being altered... slightly... and expensively... and incompetently... it beggars belief that such a ragbag of ill-conceived half-measures, get labeled "reform." The bill that brought in the National Health Service in Britain, now that was a proper, meaningful Reform. What's happening in the United States is simply more of the same system, which simply doesn't work, is vastly, wastefully, expensive, corrupt and doesn't deliver healthcare efficiently.

Without addressing the inadequacies of the present system and replacing them with something cheaper, more rational, fairer, and effective; there is no reform.

The tragedy is, given real leadership, (that is a president who truly believes in reform, for all the above reasons, and uses his rhetorical skills to explain the vital need to reform such a corrupt system), it was perfectly possible to reform the system, as the vast majority of Americans understand that the current system simply doens't work. Yet what does Obama do? He chooses to go in the opposite direction and introduce minor changes, and compromises, that are acceptable to the drug and insurance industries that have a stranglehold on the healthcare system, and are the primary reason the system has degenerated. His lack of leadership actually confuses the major issues, and undermines the concensus for substantive reform that existed.

And this is typical of the man. He's weak and bends towards the powerful, always ready and willing to compromise with the opposition, even when he's got a majority behind him, which of course he undermines at the first oppotunity, then when he needs it, it's gone, and he's thrown it away.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets