Return to: Home | Politics

The scandal of our railways

Published 09 July 2009

Has there ever been any public policy decision as botched, chaotic and disastrous as the privatisation of the railways?

‘‘If I could rerun the past,” says the new Transport Secretary, Andrew Adonis, in his interview on page 16, “I would have tried to pull the plug on rail privatisation in the mid-1990s, because the whole way in which it was done by the Conservatives was so fundamentally flawed.” It is reassuring to hear the New Labour arch-moderniser Lord Adonis echo the settled view of so many on both the left and the right of British politics. Has there ever been any public policy decision as botched, chaotic and disastrous as the privatisation of the railways?

Transport policy affects all of us; Britain, after all, remains a nation of commuters. But politicians on both sides of the divide have failed scandalously to give proper importance to transport and, in particular, to the railways. One need only look at the turnover of transport secretaries in recent years to find an example of this. After 12 years of New Labour, we are, astonishingly, on our 11th transport supremo. Lord Adonis – whose predecessors in the job include now-discredited figures such as John Prescott, Stephen Byers and Geoff Hoon – is the fourth transport secretary in three years. Is it any wonder that we are no closer to establishing an “integrated transport policy” than when Prescott first aired this piquant platitude in 1997?

As continental Europe invests in high-speed rail, building new lines, our railways are a mess. Fares are rising fares, services are poorer and there has been a fall in passenger numbers for the first time in two decades.

The recent government takeover of the East Coast main line illustrates how rail management is in a permanent state of crisis. Reimagining transport policy is one of the greatest challenges of government. It will require a minister who can overcome the timidity and bureaucratic incompetence that has stymied past attempts to improve and modernise our dysfunctional railways.

Lord Adonis is passionate in his commitment to change. But will he have enough time to act?

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

1 comment from readers

Gerry Myer
11 July 2009 at 11:56

The privatisation of the railways in Britain far surpassed the folly, a couple of decades earlier, of excessively trimming the network on the advice of Dr Beeching. Had his report not preceded that of the Club of Rome, Limits to Growth, then maybe politicians, who usually see no further than the next election, would have foreseen a future need for inexpensive, efficient public transport.

The fragmentation of British Rail into some 25 separate companies was a predictable faux pas conceived by Cecil Parkinson, a man with a track record for illegitimate conceptions.

However it would be disingenuous to imply that all was well before denationalisation; corruption amongst BR staff was endemic. Once, on an almost empty evening train from Carlisle to Newcastle, the guard/ticket collector asked me to return my ticket to him as I left the train – I presume so that he might claim that it was a mistaken issue and so trouser my fare.

Another journey from Fort William to Glasgow was almost surreal, as the train made arbitrary stops on Rannoch Moor so that friends of the guard/ticket collector could be picked up from a fishing trip and later it stopped on the approaches to Glasgow so that the crew could run over to a local fish and chip shop.

Although I reported both incidents, I received no feedback.

Despite the present need for huge investment in our railways, such developments are mere dreams for a bankrupt nation.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker