Registered user login:

Bolivia's make-or-break referendum

John Crabtree

Published 16 May 2008

Bolivia's Right has pushed for a referendum to unseat Evo Morales, but could it hurt them more than the president?

The gauntlet has been thrown down. President Evo Morales has fixed 10 August as the date for the recall referendum that will decide his fate, and that of his vice-president and nine 'departmental prefects', the heads of regional government. He will hope for a victory that will silence the country's increasingly vocal right-wing opposition.

It was the right who initiated the recall referendum, though it now seems the ploy may backfire. On 8 May, the bill introducing a referendum, originally a government initiative, was passed by the opposition-controlled senate. Opposition leaders believe that popular opinion is fast moving against the government and that the bill creates an opportunity to force Morales’ resignation. Rising to the challenge, Morales immediately signed it into law.

The left-leaning government in Bolivia has come under growing attack from the opposition parties, which refuse to accept the legitimacy of a new constitutional text, drafted last year by a representative constituent assembly. The new constitution promises to extend the political and social rights of the country’s indigenous majority, one of the pledges that helped Morales win a landslide victory in the December 2005 presidential elections.

From its political base in the resource-rich eastern lowland department of Santa Cruz, the opposition wants to neuter the constitution. To do so, it recently raised the political stakes by demanding autonomy for Santa Cruz, as well as three other lowland departments (Tarija, Beni and Pando). On 4 May, in spite of widespread abstention, civic authorities in Santa Cruz scored a victory in a departmental referendum to approve de facto ‘statutes of autonomy’ that negate the sense of the new constitution. But the vote was denounced by the central government as illegal and unconstitutional.

By calling the August recall referendum, Morales is now putting his own presidential career on the line. It is a gamble he thinks he will win. To force the president’s resignation, the opposition will need to muster a greater margin of votes than the 53.7% that Morales secured in 2005. Recent opinion polls underline the president’s popularity, especially in the more populous western highlands.

By the same token, the prefects will also be obliged to submit themselves to the recall referendum in their own departments. As with the presidency and vice-presidency, to recall incumbent prefects, a ‘no’ vote must be supported by at least the voting strength with which that incumbent was originally elected.

Until 2005, prefects were presidential appointees, but since then they have gained legitimacy as elected local leaders. In the case of the lowland departments, they have won prominence by spearheading the demand for autonomy. Ruben Costas, the prefect of Santa Cruz, was a key figure behind the 4 May referendum. Under the statutes of autonomy, he stands to become the department’s first governor.

Most lowland prefects will probably secure a renewed mandate in the recall referendum, since their role in the campaign for autonomy has put them in the limelight. However, the future is not so certain for opposition prefects in those parts of the country where Morales' MAS party is strong. The opposition prefects of La Paz and Cochabamba may be particularly at risk.

So rather than undermining his position, the campaign for the recall referendum may actually help Morales seize the political initiative. If he emerges strengthened from the vote – a distinct possibility – he will then push ahead with holding a further referendum required to approve the new constitution.

The constitution is central to the government’s reform agenda. This seeks to reverse neoliberal policies, reclaim public ownership for key industries and use the resources this brings to improve the lot of the poor, in what is South America’s most poverty-stricken republic.

The opposition, however, is in no mood to admit defeat. Assuming the lowland prefects are ratified in post this August, they will continue to use the issue of autonomy to harry the government. This may mean appointing de facto departmental governments and even seeking to retain the fiscal resources that the wealthier eastern departments contribute to the national coffers.

John Crabtree is a research associate at the Latin American Centre, Oxford.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

7 comments from readers

Ian Crause
16 May 2008 at 19:46

I do hope it strengthens Evo's position as you say, but I fear it is yet another hoop set up by the Right for the Bolivian government to jump through.

What happens, for example, if Reyes Villa loses in Cochabamba - a distinct possibility?Will he graciously admit defeat at the hands of a population most of whom he quite obviously feels are dirty indians and simply leave office?

This was a man who held an autonomy referendum, lost it with 25% of the vote and then called another one a few months later to ask the same question.The results of this second enterprise can be measured not in precentage points but lives lost in the fighting that ensued.

Bear in mind that the Bolivian right have also, during Morales' brief tenure, been involved in both an aborted coup and an outed assassination plot against him, and I fear that if Morales wins a stronger democratic mandate, then all it will do is get the Cambistas and their pentagon trained handlers chomping at the bit to start more fires, break open more prisons, plant more bombs (like that left outside TVB in Santa Cruz in 2006) and smash open more indigenous skulls (as happened to one of my friends there).

I admire your optimism.

TheHeathen
16 May 2008 at 22:46

I spend more than alittle bit of my time in Bolivia every month and I continue as a Canadian, to be some what incredulous at the "whites" who think they can put the "Genie" back in the bottle. There is a pragmayic "Revolution" going on. The Government has about U.S.$6,000,000,000.oo in the Central Bank, The Central Government now owns/controls the Gas fields. 80 % of the country is non white. For Bolivia, the Universe is unfolding as it should, and they are finding their own "Soul" or identity.

rolando
17 May 2008 at 11:24

I too admire Crabtree's optimism.

Having worked as an agency reporter in Latin America during the 1990s, I'm inclined towards the view that the fate of Morales could be more important for a radical and pluralist left on the continent than that of Venezuala's some times gaffe-prone Chavez. I'm thinking most recently of his comments about Angela Merkel and subsequent apology (as reported by Reuters 17/05).

Morales' party, the MAS, is also of interest: it is, after all, a "movement towards socialism". A little less declatory.

roberto white
17 May 2008 at 13:22

right. they will have their universe. just like in cuba. no money and a chance to work for the state for free the rest of their lives. 80% may be non-white but it is not "indian". You sound just like evo. well a racist is a racist. Sta Cuz has a maority of non whirs too. they mostly voted against evo in the recent ref. And the lives lost in CBBA were because the almighty president, the head cocalera, sent in his goons, non-residents mostly, to start fights. you place the balme for the rpoblems on the wrong side. evo is a facist. period. just like fidel, and hitler, and most of the other great socialist states. people like you commentators who cuddle him of perpetuate the suffering of the poor. you are not helping anyone, except evo and a few of his select corrupt buddies, find a voice. get real. name some great cuban ideas that have arisen under castro. these so called socialist states snuff out anything they don't like. and idiots like you keeps idiots like them in power

Ian Crause
19 May 2008 at 19:50

I think it was idiots like JFK who did more than anyone to keep Castro in power.

CarlosUgalde
19 May 2008 at 20:32

Nothing is as it seems. Evo's actions ,while promising at first , have gradually become like those of previous politicians which give themselves and their surrogates disproportionate power beyond the constitution ,creating abuses in one way or another under the umberella of democracy.

The referendum was a stupid bravado by the government and the only thing that it does is take focus away from the important business of growing the country's economy.

Ian Crause
20 May 2008 at 19:39

Fair point regarding the referendum idea but they have been driven to a stalemate by the opposition and, given that anything else they do will be jumped on by the US as violent oppression, what can they now do?

I am saddened to say that I think the Camba fascists & their handlers in the US government have won a check mate against the Bolivian government.Their aim all along has been to stop the government implementing their reforms at any cost.Any cost, remember, including civil war, assassination and coup d'etat.This they appear to have achieved as the govt is now forced to tread and retread old ground.There should be no need for a referendum.The Bolivian govt was elected on a ticket promising a new constitution and social justice.They were voted in to make it happen.

All systems of leadership are bound to throw up inconsistencies, are they not?There are corrupt and corruptible people in all areas and those on the left I would agree would be the most hypocritical of all, should they become corrupted by power and ignore thier more important duties.

However, this still doesn't change the fact that not even the Camba media onslaught against Morales can pin corruption on him.Homosexuality, communism, fascism, authoritarianism, not having children so being incapable of loving another human being (quite a common one, that) and last but not least, being a manifestation of Antichrist.But not corruption.

As for Sr White.... well, if you really think Morales is comparable to Hitler, Mao, and God knows what else, then you are deluded.

If you asked the poor Crucenos - you know, the ones you occasionally but sweets from at the lights - if they'd like to go to school intead of playing half naked in the street all day, or if their mum or aunt could get their cancer checked by a proper doctor - the kind they could never otherwise afford and the kind the Cubans supplied to Bolivia - I suspect quite a few would say yes.

When was the last time one of your family spent 3 days on a trolley in the Caja Petrolero without being seen?

Mine was a year ago.

Yours is a war on the poor.Nothing more.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Also by John Crabtree

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?