Registered user login:

Fear and loathing in Jerusalem

Rachel Cooke

Published 15 May 2008

Two documentaries explore the corrosive effects of conflict on Israeli society
The Battle for Jerusalem/ My Israel BBC4

To mark the 60th anniversary of the founding of the state of Israel, the BBC's Storyville strand screened three films by Israeli directors. On 14 May (9pm, 9.50pm), two were presented as a double bill: The Battle for Jerusalem by Liran Atzmor and My Israel by Yulie Cohen. To call this a tiring night's viewing is the understatement of the year. Afterwards, I felt as though I'd gone ten rounds with Madonna's personal trainer, though why I should find this surprising, I can't say.

Whatever your feelings about Israel, thinking about it, like visiting it, is nothing if not exhausting. I should know: I went to school there. The last time I went back, in 2005, I was involved in a row with the manager of my hotel within about 30 seconds of having walked in through the door. Ostensibly, this argument was about the noise in the room next door to my own. But in Israel, you can never quite tell. The backstory is always political. Loathing and suspicion are part of everyday discourse. People's tempers flare briefly but far too often, just like their cigarette lighters.

The Battle for Jerusalem was about a missing photograph album. In 1948, the Israelis lost Jerusalem's Old City to the Jordanians, a surrender that was photographed by John Phillips, who worked for Life and who was an admirer of the Zionist cause. His photographs told the world of Jewish refugees fleeing as their homes were looted by Palestinians; in one image, an Arab could be seen carrying the Torah scrolls from a synagogue.

What Phillips did not do was record what was happening elsewhere. In the hills outside Jerusalem, for example, Palestinians were leaving their villages, never to return.

Atzmor had tracked down the family of a man who did get this stuff on film, a Palestinian called Ali Zaarour. His son Zaki had carefully looked after an album of his work, moving it around the house for safekeeping like a "cat with her kittens" until, during the 1967 war, the Zaarours fled to Amman. When they finally returned to Jerusalem, just one thing had been taken from their home: this precious album.

I disbelieved Zaki's story at first. In the muddle of war, surely even the Israeli army wouldn't search a family's drawers in the hunt for potentially damning photographs? But no, he was telling the truth. Atzmor and his researchers found the album in the Israeli Military Archive, and it was finally returned to Zaki, though you sensed that it would give him no peace. However important a record of historical loss may be, it doesn't change the loss.

As he took a cab to the military archive, a Kafkaesque journey built around wearying checkpoints, Zaki described his life in Arab East Jerusalem: it's a prison, he said, only sometimes the door is ajar. Which leads me, neatly, to Yulie Cohen's film.

In 1978, Cohen was working as an El-Al stewardess. During a stopover in London, she and her fellow crew members were shot at by a Palestinian terrorist, Fahad Mihyi. Cohen was injured; a colleague died. Now, 30 years on, she had decided to help this man, still in a British prison, to get parole. She wrote to him, and felt he had changed, though for me it was telling that, while he eagerly replied to her letters, he refused to discuss the attack itself, or why he had carried it out.

Unfortunately, Cohen's film was fatally flawed. We never saw Mihyi, and his letters were enigmatic. He didn't get parole. So, she wandered down other blind alleys. There were her parents, secular fifth-generation Israelis who had fought in the war for independence, and whose silent perpetration of its founding myths she questioned. There was her "lost" brother, who had ceased contact with his family on becoming an Orthodox Jew.

I wanted to know more about the brother, but this story, too, petered out. Cohen told us that she had wanted to make a film about his conversion but he had refused to co-operate. Still, I cannot knock Cohen's motivation. Behind her film, like Atzmor's, you sensed the conviction that, whatever the occupation is doing to the Palestinians, it is also destroying Israel. In the end, this is probably the only argument that will ever change anything.

Pick of the week

The Duchess in Hull
19 May, 9pm, ITV1
Sarah Ferguson gives dieting tips to the Sargerson family.

Hold Me Tight, Let Me Go22 May, 10pm, BBC4
Kim Longinotto's moving film about a school for troubled children.

The Passions of Vaughan Williams
23 May, 8pm, BBC4
Gossipy documentary about the composer's hot-to-trot love life.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

10 comments from readers

Sharif
15 May 2008 at 10:23

I liked the article and read with great interest. Many on the left in Israel do want to have two countries along side living in peace. It is, however, a pity that Palestinians have not learned from history. Every time an offer is made and rejected by Palestinians, the % of land offer gets smaller.

In 1947, the Palestinian Arabs rejected the partition of Palestine. Had they accepted it - the Jewish state would have comprised of a Jew/Arab ratio of about 3:2 then there would have not been the 'Naqba' for the Palestinian people. The same could be said of other Arab counties. Had they not blocked Suez Canal in 1967, their borders would be much bigger. Now they will only too happy to get those lands, which they lost, in the 5-day war against Israel in 1967. We have to point out also that almost all the Jews have been also been forced to leave the Arab countries, since 1948.

Israel, however, must confess that there is no alternative but to accept a Palestinian state side-by-side and live with honor and not as an inferior entity.

nawawimohamad
15 May 2008 at 11:22

On its own, even with the nuclear arsenal, Israel can never survive. Despite the security walls, more US supports, aquiring more land, the recent enthusiasm to support Israel by France, controlling the world's economy, media and politics, the situation in Israel has never improved. Although many Jews are coming to stay, many more are leaving Israel. Despite what the Jews belief as their promised land, Israel is not the place where one can live in peace, harmony and contented. Israel is a farce and fallacy.

Cybertiger
15 May 2008 at 12:52

"Despite what the Jews belief as their promised land, Israel is not the place where one can live in peace, harmony and contented."

Texas is a land of milk and honey - and oil. I suggest that Texas be considered the neo-Promised land of the Jews.

Sharif
15 May 2008 at 14:07

I am not one of those who believe in complete destruction of Israel. Whatever atrocities and injustice to Palestinians, the state of Israel should remain on the map. What I would want is a country, which lives at piece with a Palestinian state. It should be just and honorable treaty for all sides. Palestinians must acknowledge the right of the existence.

Jews have suffered for thousands of years and the last century saw holocaust, with millions of Jews being massacred. And this is the only land they have in this world. Muslims have many countries under their control. To say that Jews are leaving in large numbers does not mean anything. Most of the people entering western and other non-Muslim countries are Muslims. Does it mean they are at end? Hardly anybody is going back to Muslim countries. Even the hardliners rather stay here with the infidels. Freedom has some charm, even for the fanatics

Amihai
15 May 2008 at 15:44

Cibertiger, obviously, does not think the Jewish people has any rights. He must think of us, Jews, as subhumans, calling for the the ethnic cleansing of the Jewish people, for all of it, from its homeland. How interesting.....

Cybertiger
16 May 2008 at 07:05

"He must think of us, Jews, as subhumans, calling for the the ethnic cleansing of the Jewish people, for all of it, from its homeland. How interesting....."

Mr. Katz (aka Amihai) appears to make the assumption that I think Jews are sub-human … because, in the interests of world peace, I innocently suggest that the gun-toting Jewish resident of Israel might peacefully bed down with the LoneStar cowboy. How intriguing …

Amihai
16 May 2008 at 10:42

Ethnic cleansing of the Jewish community of this people's homeland, Israel, is being promoted in this respected publication of the British left, under the principle of "free speech". Last time this freedom was exercised in Europe in promoting the ethnic cleansing of our people we lost millions!!! Now, elegantly, this is being promoted at the New Statesman!!! Do take a note of it….!!!

Get Used To It
19 May 2008 at 19:37

Amihai,

He is far from interesting........ just another internet nuisance nursing their disappointment.

Ron
20 May 2008 at 06:46

It's interesting that when, for once, Jewish refugees thrown out of their homes are mentioned, it is with the comment that "the other side" isn't mentioned. Now lets's see that every time Palestinian refugees are mentioned, Jewish refugees from Arab counties are mentioned as well.

But I didn't expect an ordinary TV critique. Cigarette lighters? Where did Rachel Cooke see those? About as often as one sees them in England. But, hey, what does it matter when it's about Israel? "Loathing and suspicion are part of everyday discourse." ? Of course that makes more of an impression than mentioning the sea, sun, good food, young people and the zest for living.

Harvey
21 May 2008 at 14:57

Mohammad

Reading your last post, I take it you will not be joining in the mixed doubles beach volleyball competition this weekend on Hilton Beach Tel Aviv.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Rachel Cooke trained as a reporter on The Sunday Times. She is now a writer at The Observer. In the 2006 British Press Awards, she was named Interviewer of the Year.

Read More

Vote!

Are women equal now?

Win Manu Chao
Albums!

Plus limited edition shirts and vinyl

Enter online