Registered user login:

The whole woman

Heather Thompson

Published 24 April 2008

Something I'm Not
Lucy Beresford Duckworth, 224pp, £12.99

Forty years after the introduction of oral contraception, choice has taken on a whole new meaning: there are artificial inseminations and in vitro fertilisations, celebrity adoptions and sexagenarian pregnancies, surrogates and egg donors and the glimmering prospect of clones. While internet message boards fairly groan with censorious views on how, when and if these procedures should be used, the idea of a woman choosing not to have children at all still verges on the unthinkable - but here the first-time novelist Lucy Beresford bravely plunges into the melee.

Amber, a 35-year-old London headhunter, lives with her strapping husband in a well-appointed house. Instead of falling victim to the usual biological twinges, she finds herself on the brink of mental collapse because she cannot come to terms with her inability to want children.

Burned by the hot and cold attentions of her parents, she insists that her friends are her family. They include her psychiatrist husband, Matt; a Sondheim-singing gay vicar named Dylan (Amber refers to his boyfriend as "Camp David"); and Nicole, a fast-talking, Delhi-born beauty. They live in a world where headhunters take extended lunch and coffee breaks to discuss the demerits of pregnancy, where vandalism and infidelity are largely consequence-free, where the parents of small children find the time to star in church musicals, and where joblessness means some time to sort out "personal issues", rather than a frantic scramble for a new position.

Most are defined, in Amber's mind at least, by their attitudes towards procreation: frumpy Jenny and her moustachioed partner Clive remain childless; delicate Louisa was impregnated and abandoned; chaotic Serena and Harry breed with cheery abandon. Everybody weighs in on the subject of motherhood. Nicole shuns her family's traditions, scornfully rejecting the notion that "women who don't want a baby are, by definition, empty specimens". Louisa's mother, Prue, maintains that "a woman isn't complete until she's had a baby". Matt thinks "it's a pity more people don't consider the effect kids will have on a relationship before they conceive".

While Amber stridently insists that "not enough women today believe they have permission not to have" children, she sits uneasily on a bubbling pot of barely contained neuroses. She follows recipes to the salt grain, organises her godchildren in a spreadsheet, "plans her spontaneity" and, when distressed, pulls compulsively at the hair along her parting. She whispers, she shrieks, her insides "churn" and "curdle". To Beresford's credit, she also manages to be charming - witty and vulnerable.

In the end, it all comes back to the mother: Amber's problems, and her decision to remain childless, are entwined with her troubled family history. The idea that some women do not want children - even after they've had them - causes relief when applied to herself and her friends, but intolerable anguish when attached to her own mum. Selfish and sarcastic, with a cackle like "Snow White's witch", this mother inhabits cartoonish dimensions. Like her daughter, she long ago erected emotional walls to contain the pain, but time and trauma made hers more like an Iron Maiden, with spikes outside as well as in.

She hides to avoid her daughter's visits, rejects her gifts and announces that she "always wanted grandchildren". Her behaviour is not a new development: her daughter remembers a teary altercation at the beach about 30 years earlier, when she watched ants crawl over the ice-cream-covered leg of a toddler-aged Amber with something akin to satisfaction because "it serve[d her] right". No doubt inspired by her professional experiences as a psychodynamic psychotherapist, Beresford skilfully shows the subjectivity of this portrayal: only by recognising her mother's humanity can Amber begin to come to terms with her own.

The problem is that it all feels a little conflicted - as if two or three separate novels were fighting to get out. There is a light-hearted fantasy about clever, affluent, attractive Londoners; a feminist discourse about what exactly women should do with that "room of their own" once they have it; and a sensitive account of depression and family dysfunction, a sort of therapy memoir with the author as therapist. It is entirely characteristic of this mix of seriousness and Sex and the City that Amber's nuanced evolution from insecure childishness to sensitive nurturer can be traced through her hairdos: an ever-changing rainbow of dye jobs crescendoes to a blunt, bleached Rosemary's Baby-style cut at the height of turmoil; a return to her natural colour heralds the arrival of inner peace.

Beresford's prose is, by turns, solemn and satirical, vacuous and polemical. Her marvellously funny observations ("We had a row, or rather I chucked a few toys out of my pram while Matt checked the contents of his golf bag") counter the more saccharine moments ("it was as though Hope took it upon herself to shed her own name, sliding into a black hole of hopelessness"), but the combination never quite coalesces.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

1 comment from readers

emmagold
29 April 2008 at 00:44

I'm surprised that, judging by this book (which I acknowledge is a novel but I imagine it's realistic), it STILL seems to be seen as unacceptable for a woman to say she doesn't want children; I'd have thought it might even be seen as meritorious in view of the effect of population growth on the environment. I myself always knew (at least from the age of 15; in 1960) that I didn't want children, and was subjected to a LOT of castigation for this, even from people who were not affected at all by this decision, throughout my (presumably; I never tested it) fertile years.

"Women who don't want babies are empty specimens"; what a thing for one of the characters to say! (and I notice MEN who don't want children are not similarly stigmatised). "A woman isn't compete until she's had a baby"! again a really stupid remark which is not extended to men. Both these remarks, and all similar ones, might risk inducing people to have children who hadn't previously intended to.

Very many people who criticise those who choose to be child-free accuse us of selfishness. Doesn't it ever occur to these people that it's at least equally selfish - and FAR more damaging (at least potentially) - to HAVE children for the wrong reasons especially if you then proceed to abuse them (as do far more parents than we like to think) emotionally, and/or sexually, and/or physically? Admittedly my first reason for deciding not to have children was fear of childbirth but I later decided that in any case I OUGHT not to have any because, not having received them myself, I would be unable to give any children I had had the four minimum emotional supports I believe all children need: love, emotional security, confidence, and high self-esteem; how many people who DO have children do so without even CONSIDERING what sort of parents they will make and what sort of emotional supports they will be able to give?

Almost 30 years ago I worked with a man who told me that although he and his wife had wanted children they had decided not to have any because his wife's twin brother suffered from a serious mental condition and they had been told by a doctor that any children they had had might inherit this. In my opinion this was very responsible of them; FAR more so than if they hadn't even asked about the possibility of inheriting this condition and had simply had the children they wanted; as people who condemn those of us who are childless by choice/intention would probably have done!

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Also by Heather Thompson

Read More

Vote!

Are women equal now?

Win Manu Chao
Albums!

Plus limited edition shirts and vinyl

Enter online