Registered user login:

The truth about Tibet

Lindsey Hilsum

Published 19 March 2008

The last thing China wanted, in the year it is to host the Olympic Games, was the world watching its army brutally suppressing protesters

Things are not going as planned. The emblematic images of China in 2008 were supposed to be the magnificent "Bird's Nest" sports stadium, and millions of proud Chinese applauding their country's success in hosting the Olympic Games. Instead, the world is seeing gangs of angry Tibetan rioters attacking their Han Chinese neighbours, and Buddhist monks demonstrating against Chinese rule.

Since the 1989 unrest, which centred on Tiananmen Square but spread to Tibet, any protest has been suppressed quickly and effectively. But this time, initially, the Chinese hesitated. The government knew that nothing could be worse for China's reputation in this Olympic year than Tiananmen-type images of the soldiers of the People's Liberation Army firing on Tibetan demonstrators. So it flooded the streets with armour, in the hope that intimidation would do the trick. By Monday, Beijing had moved troops and paramilitary riot police into all sensitive areas, hoping to quash protest with a show of strength.

On Tuesday, the Chinese premier, Wen Jiabao, accused the Dalai Lama of orchestrating the unrest, saying that the protesters wanted "to incite the sabotage of the Olympic Games in order to achieve their unspeakable goal". That goal is independence for Tibet, but it is the social rather than the political motivation that has disturbed the Chinese authorities.

They have been surprised by the ferocity with which ethnic Tibetans attacked Han Chinese and Hui Muslims. These two groups have settled in Tibet in recent decades, starting up businesses and benefiting more than local people from the upturn in the Tibetan economy. Yet never before has resentment turned to such widespread violence: one eyewitness in Lhasa described the riots as "an orgy of racist violence".

The Huis, who control the meat trade and other essential commercial sectors, have long been the target of Tibetan anger. Last month, fighting broke out in Qinghai, which borders Tibet, during New Year celebrations. The point of contention was, apparently, the price of a balloon that a Hui trader had sold to a Tibetan. After the police arrested several Tibetans, overseas activists said demonstrations were calling for the return of the Dalai Lama. But the spark for the protests was the tension between the two communities.

One of the central myths the Chinese government propagates is the unity of the state and the happiness of the 55 ethnic minorities within it. During the week, at the National People's Congress, the annual gathering of China's rubber-stamp parliament, women in aluminium headdresses and other exotic gear were paraded as the acceptable face of diversity.

"This is a planned, plotted activity that aims at splitting the country, sabotaging the union and damaging the harmony and social stability of Tibet," said Champa Phuntsok, governor of Tibet, an ethnic Tibetan whom many people regard as a collaborator. In an example of the overblown rhetoric that characterises Chinese statements on Tibet, the government proclaimed "a people's war against splittism" - the term used to describe the movement for Tibetan autonomy - and said it would "expose the hideous face of the Dalai Lama's clique".

To the shock of the Chinese authorities, the unrest rapidly spread to the provinces of Gansu, Qinghai and Sichuan, which have significant Tibetan minorities. The Tibetan government-in-exile in Dharamsala claims all these provinces as part of "historical Tibet" - one reason for the failure of talks between the Dalai Lama and the Chinese government.

In Xiahe, in Gansu, the main street was lined with shuttered shops whose upstairs windows had been shattered by protesters. Here, Tibetans had targeted the Han Chinese who own most of the businesses. Knots of youths hung about at dusk, while riot police lurked at street corners, banging their riot shields menacingly. Most Tibetans still follow the Dalai Lama, but his entreaties that protest should be peaceful seem to have little resonance among the younger Tibetans. Speaking from Dharamsala, he said he had no power to call off the protests.

Monks from Labrang Monastery marched through the streets of Xiahe waving the banned Tibetan flag. "People in Lhasa and us are the same people. We have the same ideas," said a monk. "Today's young people think more of human rights. We want the Dalai Lama back."

Many westerners, who see justice in the Tibetan cause and nobility in the Dalai Lama's position, regard the Tibetans as a peaceful and oppressed people. That view, however, is not shared by all of the Han Chinese who live there. Many of them believe that China brought the chance of prosperity and modern isation to a backward area.

"Our party and government spend so much every year to support the development of Tibet.

"We don't wish for any reward, but those people controlled by Dalai still continue with separatism. They should go to hell," read one blog on the popular site China.com.

As communism has faded away, the ideological void has been filled by nationalism. The intention behind this year's Olympic extravaganza is to celebrate how great China is as a historical nation and as a modern state. Even those who dislike the government in Beijing may regard Tibetan nationalists as unpatriotic and ungrateful. A chat-room comment on Tianya.com reprimanded them: "We do not have to love the government and the party, but we must love China." Another said: "Those separatist trash should all be killed. It is not a good idea to just talk about it. Even if some day there is democracy, I will support a nationalist party to power."

Racism is usual. One blogger addressed Tibetans, writing: "If you behave well, we'll protect your culture and benefits. But if you behave badly, we'll still take care of your culture . . . by putting it in a museum. I believe in the Han people!"

None acknowledged that harsh policies in Tibet have provoked the unrest. It's easier to keep blaming the Dalai Lama.

The Chinese government had hoped to have a display of traditional Tibetan dancing at the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics. If it now moves to suppress the protests with force, it faces the possibility of an Olympic boycott. But if it lets the protests continue, the world will see how widespread is the unhappiness and resentment of China's Tibetan people.

Lindsey Hilsum is international editor for Channel 4 News

Tibetan Times

October 1950 Chinese People's Liberation Army marches into Tibet

March 1959 Tibetans attempt uprising; thousands killed. Dalai Lama flees to India with 80,000 followers

September 1965 Tibet Autonomous Region formally established

1966 China's Cultural Revolution begins; Tibetan Red Guards smash statues of Buddha and close monasteries

1972 Richard Nixon visits China and ends CIA programme of training Tibetans to fight guerrilla war against Chinese

1989 Martial law imposed in Lhasa. Brutal suppression of Tiananmen Square student protests

May 1990 Martial law lifted. Dalai Lama disbands government-in-exile

1994 Dalai Lama suspends dialogue with China due to lack of progress

March 1999 China says its doors are open to Dalai Lama, provided he recognises Tibet as part of China

December 1999 Dalai Lama says Tibet would be satisfied with self-rule but accuses China of cultural genocide

July 2006 Tibet groups accuse China of accelerating influx of Han Chinese

March 2008 Anti-China riots in Lhasa

Source: Reuters

Post this article to

39 comments from readers

tenzin2
19 March 2008 at 19:57

free tibet

tenzin2
19 March 2008 at 20:10

The title "truth about Tibet" is not justified in the column when we all know that the media is totally shutdown to hide the dirty and unfathomable atricities done to Tibetan people in the name of security.millions have already died since 1959 and the communist rule has never tried to solve the issues with dialogue and understanding but rather went along their traditional technique of suppression through force.Tiananmen square massacre is a shining example and such is obviously happenning at this very moment since the media is shutdown and there is none whatsoever effort from UNO to investigate.UNO should walk the talk and do what they are supposed to do, otherwise there is no need for such organiation. The truth about Tibet is that we are denied of the truth by the communist media shutdown and that fact is not stressed enough.

mutikonka
20 March 2008 at 03:49

Hui Muslims have lived in Tibet for hundreds of years, not just in recent times. They traditionally filled the role of butchers and leatherworkers because Tibetan Buddhists would eat meat etc but not kill animals.

WorldCitizen
20 March 2008 at 13:14

Tibetans have made a grave mistake by targeting businesses owned by Han Chinese.

The problem is not the Han Chinese, but the Chinese Government. By harming innocent Han Chinese, they have annoyed 1.3 billion people (and not a few CCP goons). .

David.H.PhIlip
20 March 2008 at 14:55

I am not a nationalist but a mult-culturalist.

The problems between the Tibetants and other peoples is very complicated by the gaps among them,such as the differences of economy,customs,religions,the way of life etc.

In facts, some comments is prejudicious. because if the hatred of some Tibetans comes from the political terror,they can protest goverment,but why they killed civilians.if you comes to some university to visit the class of young Tibtants,you can get some facts about the clash between the Tibtants and other people. Sixteen years ago, I left from the college of the metallurgical industry in Yunnan province.some students of Tibtants often robed money publicly at weekend from one dormitory to other dormitory, if you refused,they hit you by alcohol bottle.if you want to be protected by the law,the law or policy just favour them.In china, the facts is that the members of HAN people be suppressed by other members of minorites, especially by muslim and Tibetantism.because they are minorities, they have some prerogative from the central goverment.such as in business and industry, taxs on them is more lower than Han people. In Yuxi City of Yunnan province, the Muslim monopolize almost whole serves of bus. The Yuxi normal university want to prolong the road of serves by other bus which is not belonging to Muslim just offering conveniency for students, The Muslim said, no.but when beg them prolonging road of their serves, they refused. If all of you don,t believe all my words, just comes to here, Yunnan province to investigate the truth the injustice between the Han people and other minorities.Yes, welcome to Yuxi City,welcome to Yunnan Province,I will do some help I can only for all of you getting the facts and truths.

BeFair!
20 March 2008 at 20:38

False news is more evil! And the Chinese are not idiots

(http://www.takungpao.com/news/08/03/20/ZMTG-880387.htm)

Now why do these media in the liberal democracy in the West do these things? Noble Lie??? Or the Chinese people are by nature inferior?

Shameful!

BeFair!
20 March 2008 at 20:48

1. http://www.takungpao.com/news/08/03/20/ZMTG-880387.htm)

2. Now why do these media in the liberal democracy in the West do these things?

3 Should we call this dirty trick, or Schadenfreude, or shameful "Noble Lie", or innocent mistake, or still plagued by a sense of superiority?

tenzin2
20 March 2008 at 23:00

just let the media enter Tibet as per international media regulations and the fact will come out.China has no excuse atall and this is totally against people's right in this century to deny them of rightful media coverage.I think global community have more faith in BBC,CNN than beijing's communist dictated news.wake up and be a 21st century where media is public's window to truth and denying it is the height of stupidity.wake up china...wake up !!

kingman
21 March 2008 at 05:34

The Tibetans that have the biggest voice are from the rich, the nobilities, the religious, the lamas. Does any body hear from the poor class and peasants who are the silent majority and benefit from the Chinese government minority policies. Traditionally they worked like slaves for the rich, the powerful and the lamas. Their minds were controlled by religion not to complain. Now the hollywood kind such as Richard Gere came to find meanings from Dalai Lama. Tibet is viewed as so sureal, so enlightened, local Tibetans are viewed not in human terms. They don't seem to need to eat or to live a material life, but just to exist to entertain the hollywood kinds. The media has been led down this path too. When did you see a good report about ordinary life of common Tibetans, whether their lives fare better or worse than ten or twenty years ago, or for that matter sixty years ago when they were ruled by the lamas. The Tibetan culture is fascinating, but when is the media going to treat the Tibetans in the coverage like ordinary human beings, that they need to make a living, to deal with normal human desires, to move up in the economic ladder. If the media thinks that they don't need all these and they are happy, then the media has been pickled by the lamas deeper and longer than theTibetans.

As for China's Olympics, that is no big deal. All the great nations' olympics have been boycotted, US's in 1984 Los Angeles, USSR's in 1990 Moscow. If you are boycotted in Olympics, that means you have arrived, you have made it.

radius
21 March 2008 at 17:37

Of all the rights and wrongs, the CIA' s involvement and the reasons for it, seldom gets mentioned in the western media.

There is no doubt that the Americans and their allies want to dismember China; or that the lamaist clergy have a very poor track record on human rights and democracy.

BritishAirman
21 March 2008 at 18:34

The desire and quench of the protagonist's in having this summer's Olympic Games boycotted must first reflect on what the Games is about. The Olympics are about teams and individuals achieving and aspiring to the highest possible standards in their chosen sporting field. This same argument equally applies to the host nation. For 17-days in August, commencing August 8, the Chinese Government hopes and expects that Beijing will boost its popularity both at home and abroad. Of late and particularly given the Tibet crisis, China's image has been violently shaken. It has not had a particularly easy time trying to sell the games to the world.

Recently, Steven Spielberg resigned as artistic director over the grave concerns the film director had over Chinese policy towards the slaughter and genocide in Darfur. In recent days, Tibetan monks, frustrated and angry by decades of inequality and oppression, were met with violence and threats as they took their grievances on to the streets of Lhasa. The protests brought black-outs as the Chinese Government controlled and manipulated foreign news channels, the Chinese being concerned over the official estimates of casualties that defy credibility. Incredibly, the Dalai Lama - a former Nobel Peace Prize winner - who has attempted I brokering a peaceful solution for years, was blamed by China for fomenting the unrest. The Dalai Lama reacted by calling on the Chinese government, once again, to negotiate.

The Dalai Lama's position is important to understand. His stance and political ideology is for more autonomy and respect for the language and culture of Tibet, rather than full-blown separation. The last Tibetan uprising happened more than twenty years ago, but China invested huge sums in railway construction and economic development in the province in the expectation that Tibetan nationalism would have been damped down. However, as people of the Celtic nations can probably appreciate themselves, modest improvements in living standards are no substitute for the accurate recognition of a people's culture and history. Do the railways, for instance, merely facilitate the export of Tibetan timber and minerals in feeding China's superfast economic growth? Or, Tibet's enrichment having gone to Chinese incomers rather than to the indigenous people.

China must understand one thing. If it believes they can gloss over rumblings in Tibet, until after the Olympics, they are mistaken. With the world's media now firmly fixed on Tibet watching how China will handle the situation, the litmus test is how far the government has moved since the events of Tiananmen Square in 1989. China will find it almost impossible to suppress and distort future news coverage because its ability to do so is weakened through the spread of the Internet and the availability of mobile telecommunications.

Why has the British Government kept tightly-mouthed in raising human rights issues with its counterparts in Beijing, given the notion of 'freedom' it is willing to promote in these shores?

Many thanks,

http://www.markatscotland.blogspot.com

mark.dowe@googlemail.com

bullcn
22 March 2008 at 04:09

I wish our friends know the real truth about tibet. Please visit:

http://club.news.sohu.com/r-minjian-1674596-0-1245-0.html

Douglas Chalmers
22 March 2008 at 04:53

Oh, I notice that your 'potted history' only ran from 1950 and conveniently avoided the armed invasion of Tibet by the British expeditionary force in 1903 and 1904 ...by British Indian forces (purportedly) seeking to prevent the Russian Empire from interfering in Tibetan affairs and thus gaining a foothold in one of the buffer states surrounding British India, under similar reasoning which had led British forces into Afghanistan twenty years before.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_expedition_to_Tibet

Tibet was invaded by a British expeditionary force under Colonel Younghusband, ... When the British invaded Tibet, the 13th Dalai Lama went to Mongolia. ... http://www.friends-of-tibet.org.nz/tibet.html

and the border wars between China and India which the British caused by their occupation of India and their previous invasion of Tibet have resulted in China will not leaving Tibet until they can be assured that there will be no interference from outside interests trying to pressure China.

Unfortunately, Tibetans have little say in that at present. The main imperative is that China has 14 countries on its borders and a couple more off its coast. That includes Russia, India and Japan. They have a lot to handle diplomatically and militarily and the last thing they need is another renegade province. Taiwan was occupied by the Japanese during WW2 and then was a fortress retreat for the KMT and general Chiang Kai Shek’s Nationalist army in 1949. The mainland PRC want it back but are prepared to wait. This week’s presidential election in Taiwan will be telling.

From Al Jazeera English, Tibet’s regional governor said security forces had exercised “massive restraint” to quell anti-China riots last week - China struggles with Tibetan unrest - 17 Mar 08 http://youtube.com/watch?v=onB7pIT4mKo By the way, you can blog your comments on an English-language forum IN China as well if you really want to be heard about Tibet or any other issue........ http://enpf.chinabroadcast.cn/TalkChina/forums/15/Show Forum.aspx

Douglas Chalmers
22 March 2008 at 05:09

Tibet Question - English language forum in BeiJing http://enpf.chinabroadcast.cn/TalkChina/forums/15/ShowForum....

BeFair!
22 March 2008 at 16:11

A brilliant case of self-deception!

Yea, wake-up!

When people are not holding the same opinion, some would come up ringing the wake-up call. Only those who agree with you have the privilege of being in the bright side. All others remain hopelessly deep in their hallucination waiting for the wake-up call.

What a glittering knight!

What a blessing that the world have guys like you.

The rest of the world are waiting for you guys to enlighten.

It's been a long time that whenever there is a conflict in the world, the cause of which may be very very very suspicious and will be disclosed if ever only very very late, some would come up with a ready indictment about who the evil guy is and who the good angel is.

Hahahaha .... you see, the reality is that there comes to be no such thing as reality. Who is self-deceptive and who is not? What if 'they' come to you and are so kindly have your attention to the 'reality' and remind you to 'hey, wake up, man!'?

For those (self-)righteous people who really are keen on Tibet and the well-being of Tibetans (and refuse to wake up perhaps?):

History of Modern Tibet by Melvyn C. Goldstein, 2 vols.

The making of Modern Tibet, by A.Tom Grunfeld

--a weak voice from among 'the rest'

Douglas Chalmers
22 March 2008 at 21:40

Riot Reports Show Media Bias in West - Chinese netizens, including students studying overseas, have been angered by biased and sometimes dishonest reports about the recent riots in Tibet by some Western media.....

Full China coverage - Lhasa Riot http://english.cri.cn/3126/2008/03/20/Zt1321@336118.htm

Douglas Chalmers
22 March 2008 at 22:05

Riot in Tibet: True face of western media http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=uSQnK5FcKas

writeon
23 March 2008 at 12:18

I've actually been waiting for 'unrest' to begin in Tibet for a long time. I'm not an apologist for the Chinese government, but I think they've done a reasonable job of steering the economic development of China over the last few decades. They took Capitalism and welded it to nationalism and the country surged forward.

But in the increasingly competative climate between China and the United States China's minorities were always the achilles heel that could be 'activated' in this struggle.

There have always been forces in the United States that desired a far more confrontational line in relation to China, the 'dream' of rolling back the Chinese revolution and re-establishing 'proper' relations between the two countries, a balance far more favourable to the United States has never been given up completely.

In much the same way as the United States used the 'revolution' in the Ukraine as a bridgehead to further undermine a weakened Russia, Tibet is a useful stage where one can question the legitimacy of the current Chinese leadership.

What's happening in Tibet is as much about the relationship between the United States and China as it is about the relationship between China and Tibet. Tibet is a bat the Americans are using to beat China with. They care next to nothing about the fate of the Tibetans and the Tibetans would be wise to consider whether it's really in their interests to become pawns in a far bigger and deadlier geo-political game between China and the United States.

Douglas Chalmers
24 March 2008 at 04:02

Sadly, you are right on there, writeon (23 Mar), that the West does want a confrontation with China despite the current status quo that we need each other ecomnomically and that there has been huge US and European investment in China. It is the very fact that the American economic empire is crumbling and that China holds more US foreign debt than any other country that will induce the USA to look for any means as a scapegoat.

It was known that Taiwan would vote for the return of the KMT and that they would pursue closer ties with China. The riots in Lhasa have done nothing to deter that despite their obvious timing. Thus the USA no longer has any means of exerting pressure on China and so they have jumped to focus all of their attention on Tibet as a result.

There is no doubt that the Neocons, including France's Sarkosy (a US lapdog if ever there was one) and Germany as a NATO ally, would not hesitate in "starting WW3" over Tibet as much as they have already threatened to do so over Iraq and Afghanistan. Therefore, Tibet is now at risk of becoming the world's No.1 flashpoint.

But it is NOT "loving kindness" to attack or to condemn Chinese by siding with Tibetans against them. Tibetans are no more perfect than any of the other 55 ethnic groups in China. In fact, the Buddhist religion was most probably more successfully established far earlier in China than in Tibet. It was not a peaceful place and its warrior tribes were much like the old Scottish highlanders. It is and was no ShangriLa despite your dreams and illusions.

As you can hear on this clip for yourself, even Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama has difficulty in separating himself from his ethnic roots and love of his country. Such attachment colours one's motives and thus leads away from the path of the Buddha who, himself - as a prince, had to completely renounce all of that in order to attain real Enlightenment.

Thus, the Dalai Lama has indeed been playing a kind of double game and it is not one of single-minded dedication to non-violence (Ahimsa). If there is one thing that the Chinese respect, it is "sweep your own doorstep" first before criticizing others. If they want peace and autonomy in Tibet, they should do so too - but so must the Tibetans if the Dalai Lama wants to be welcomed in BeiJing.

DALAI LAMA: "Basically, as a Buddhist belief.... if moderation is good and the goal is good..... then method, even of an apparently violent kind, is permissible. But, then, in our situation, in our case.... whether it is practical or not..... that's the big question"

From "The CIA in TIBET 1" http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=tOhDBo6x2ZY&feature=related (at about 4.50 min.)

I would like Tenzin Gyatso to tell me where such a thing as excusing violence is to be found in the teachings of Buddha????? Thus, Tibet has its karma, uhh......

JimmyJames
24 March 2008 at 12:20

China could have allowed more cultural rights and even allowed the Dalai Lama back with his followers, and thus defused the whole crisis. Beijing should realise that a truly autonomous Tibet (which means much greater sensitivity to Tibet's unique identity) is good for both Tibetans and Chinese alike. A moderate like the Dalai Lama who enjoys the respect of many Tibetans (but now risks alienating the more radicalised youth because of his pacifism) should in fact be China's best ally. Western media sources, quick to condemn Russia over Chechnya have been very timid in urging China to open talks with the Dalai Lama

anatta
24 March 2008 at 12:50

The Dalai Lama's history with the CIA is discussed in:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8426

Frankly
24 March 2008 at 18:42

I am so pleased to see that the debate has not been totally dominated by the pro-US lobbies in the guise of "freedom". Just as in the Katerine Gun article on the exposure of the dirty underhand tricks of the CIA in the so-called UN, and the complicity of the British government, this debacle stinks of rotten fish.

Thanks, particularly to Douglas Chalmers for the info. and others…

Calm
25 March 2008 at 18:54

You can't even have an anti-war protest in America without being fenced in and arrested by SWAT teams of police. Then, your placed on the "No Fly List" and called a terrorist.

Please quite holding up America as a beacon of freedom.

Prior the war, the largest demonstations in modern history were held in Britain by people opposed to the war and the war went ahead anyway.

Please quit using Britain as a beacon of Democracy.

This trip is a sham orchestrated by America in the same way that the Orange Revolution was in the Ukraine.

This is China's year to step out upon the world stage and take it's deserved role as the number one economic power. And, American psyche can't handle this. The American's know that it will be this year that China will grab the most gold medals and not the U.S. and the American psyche can't handle it.

It is necessary for America to brand these olympics as brutal, undeserving and that China is a land of cheaters and polluters.

Calm

taghioff.info
27 March 2008 at 06:32

The truth about Tibet is far stranger than anyone has touched upon.

The Chinese are correct in saying that Tibetans were in a terrible state when they invaded, and that materially speaking the monastic system of Tibetan buddhism that existed was feudal and exploitative.

Many Tibetans are far better off materially thatn they were, though some, those excluded from the Chinese model, such as the nomads, are actually worse of materially now.

But the nub of the issue is this, despite the Chinese attempts to buy off the Tibetan population, some of it through very tangible social provision, the Tibetans wish to be the people that they see themselves as, and to continue a way of life that they recognize and feel for.

This speaks so very strongly of the limits of materialism. It is not just bricks and concrete that really move people, it is the stories we tell about ourselves.

taghioff.info
27 March 2008 at 06:37

Although a footnote must be added that a great deal of the Chinese investment in Tibet has gone on the military and the police and on inducements to keep Han Chinese in what is seen by them as the back end of nowhere.

Nonetheless, the Chinese have directed quite substantial material benefits at the parts of the Tibetan population that are willing to learn Chinese and fit in with the Chinese system.

Douglas Chalmers
27 March 2008 at 11:28

Quote Calm, 25 Mar: "You can't even have an anti-war protest in America without being fenced in and arrested by SWAT teams of police..."

US cops beat... TIBETANS in front of the UN building, shot by a white free-tibet wOrrior http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7NUNwq2MGc

David Lindsay
27 March 2008 at 17:12

If Tibet can be independent, then so can Northumbria, Mercia, Wessex and Kent. Those have at least ever existed as independent states, however long ago. Tibet has never done so. No wonder that this cause is so popular among the Lib Dems, among whom the English equivalent has had a following, carried over from the old Liberal Party, since their inception.

The sheer scale of the population transfers that would be necessary to partition multiethnic China into a Tibetan homeland and a Han homeland (plus at least 54 others, presumably) are practically impossible to imagine. The whole thing would make the partition of India look like the resolution of a Parish Council boundary dispute.

Even the Dalai Lama is officially opposed to independence. He is also opposed to any boycott of the Beijing Olympics. And Kate Hoey is right (as she generally is) to call for protests when the Olympic Flame is in London, "about conditions in China". Have you got that? In China. Including Tibet, now as ever an integral part of China.

davidaslindsay@hotmail.com, http://davidaslindsay.blogspot.com

explodingbadger
28 March 2008 at 05:53

Nice post Calm!

Gideon Polya
30 March 2008 at 00:37

The Dalai Lama himself acknowledges Tibet as an integral part of China (this dating from the 13th century). Tibet is surely more part of China than part of the genocidal American Empire that now additionally stretches outside America (with a few US hegemonic or US-threatened gaps) from US surrogate Ethiopia-occupied Somalia to US-bombed Waziristan in Pakistan (adjoining Tibet) .

Any avoidable death is a tragedy. How many people have been killed (Han and Hui by Tibetans or vice versa) in the recent troubles? Unfortunately perhaps hundreds? But certainly not comparable to the estimated 1,300 under-5 year old infants who die avoidably EACH DAY in the war criminally US-UK-Australian-occupied Occupied Iraqi and Afghan Territories or the 2,400 infants who die avoidably EACH YEAR in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

Indeed for a perspective one notes that right wing, Bush-lite, neo-Bush-ite Australian PM Kevin Rudd (aka Religious Right Rudd, R3) in visiting his "boss" in Washington this week made a special point of adopting the US line on Tibet - a crawling subservience approved by Bush, the world's #1 terrorist, war-maker and human rights abuser.

This amounts to gross hypocrisy on the part of both Bush and his lackey the Australian Government. For a quantitative illustration of this simply refer to my Formal Complaint to the International Criminal Court over Australian complicity in ongoing Aboriginal Genocide (9,000 excess deaths annually, 90,000 in the last dozen years out of a 0.5 million population), the Iraqi Genocide (post-invasion excess deaths 1.5-2 million, 4.5 million refugees), the Afghan Genocide (post-invasion excess deaths 3-6 million, 4 million refugees) and Climate Genocide (16 million avoidable deaths annually, now increasingly impacted by global warming and the US-UK-EU-Australian biofuel-linked global food price rise perversion, Australia's annual per capita fossil fuel-derived CO2 pollution, including coal exports, being 10 times greater than the world average or China's - 2004 data) (see: http://climateemergency.blogspot.com/ ).

All decent anti-racist, humanitarian people want strict human rights observance for ALL humanity, everywhere. The US, Australian, UK and EU government and Mainstream media comments over Tibet represent gross hypocrisy.

Non-violence, dialogue and active Chinese Government PROMOTION of Tibetan and other minority cultures would surely be the most useful course. Indeed outstanding US scholar Professor Jared Diamond ("Guns, Germs and Steel") made precisely this sort of point some years ago in a Melbourne lecture in which he argued strongly for the active preservation of all Indigenous languages and cultures.

7777777
30 March 2008 at 07:18

March 29, 2008

Another truth Communists were originally created described in the Goals of the Catholic Illuminati and Vatican pursuing the Edict of Domitian (Ceasars Rome) pursued the destruction of Saint Issa, (Jesus Christ) the House of David have after more then a 1000 years confessed via a parchment the Knights Templars were declared innocent again the same scenario to find the Scrolls of Saint Issa and erase all written memory of his existence in Tibet duirng what is described his lost years. May heaven bless the Tibetans, those in exile for sheltering teaching Saint Issa prior to his fulfilling his karmic destiny to ascend the Cross as save all of humanity from evil from the beginning of time until the end of time and I say this in the name of Saint Issa Jesus Christ.

ashleyhk
30 March 2008 at 16:00

Why does this feed attract so many nutters? Far out of propostion to even the Guardians CIF.

nawawimohamad
01 April 2008 at 10:27

Monks should not involve in politics. The future of Tibet must be determined by the people of Tibet, via voting through the politicians and not the monks or Dalai Lama. If China is ever genuine in its policy towards Tibet, China must hold a free REFERENDUM in Tibet but of course the latest planned non- Tibetan population migration made by Beijing should not be considered. There should be another REFERENDUM on the matter if the first REFERENDUM resulted in Tibet remaining in China. To make the process legitimate, the REFERENDUM must be conducted by a recognised independent international body to be set up on an adhoc basis. Do not let the US and UN get involved because that would be biased.

There is no point in having spontaneous and sporadic demonstrations resulting in endless trouble, death and destruction.

But of course there are no natural resources like oil, mineral and gas in Tibet that will lure the international community to undertake the above initiative. If that is the case for Tibet, then let's find oil first!

bejjj369
02 April 2008 at 16:29

there is a massive amount of natural resources is tibet. trillions of dollars worth of oil and minerals. mining and the accompanying deforestation and environmental degridation have been well documented.

howard
09 April 2008 at 02:25

here is the truth about tibet that most western media choose to ignore (but you can find on the INternet):

Prior to the Chinese central government intervene, Dalai Lama was a dictator, leader of a theocratic slavery society. There is no human rights whatsoever since if you do not belong to the elite monks, then you are their belongings. Now Dalai Lama is in exile... of course he wants his kingdom restored. The next time someone yell "free tibet", you are essentially supporting a dictator and slave master.

Don't believe what I wrote --- go search for Tibet's history.

howard
09 April 2008 at 02:29

Also, how can the Dalai Lama and "his government in exile" represents the interests of all the CHinese living in Tibet, including the ethic tibetan chinese as well as other ethic chinese groups? It is quite ironic to see someone like Dalia Lama get the Nobel Peace award.

vysis
10 April 2008 at 06:20

October 1950 Chinese People's Liberation Army marches into Tibet (well, when you try to take over a country, thats what usually happens...)

March 1959 Tibetans attempt uprising; thousands killed. Dalai Lama flees to India with 80,000 followers

(Well, WHEN THERES AN UPRISING people USUALLY DIE.)

September 1965 Tibet Autonomous Region formally established

1966 China's Cultural Revolution begins; Tibetan Red Guards smash statues of Buddha and close monasteries

(Enstein, if you know anything about the Cultural Revolution you will know it applied to all religions)

1972 Richard Nixon visits China and ends CIA programme of training Tibetans to fight guerrilla war against Chinese

(and why did the CIA train Tibetans to fight an Guerilla war in the first place?)

1989 Martial law imposed in Lhasa. Brutal suppression of Tiananmen Square student protests

(HOW does the Tiananmen protest have ANYTHING to do with Lhasa... HONESTLY!)

May 1990 Martial law lifted. Dalai Lama disbands government-in-exile

1994 Dalai Lama suspends dialogue with China due to lack of progress

(well yea, people generally ignore you when your trying to take a chunck of real-estate off them for nothing)

March 1999 China says its doors are open to Dalai Lama, provided he recognises Tibet as part of China

(and it still is)

December 1999 Dalai Lama says Tibet would be satisfied with self-rule but accuses China of cultural genocide

(The Dalai Lama would know, especially since he hasnt stepped a foot inside tibet for what? 40 years?)

July 2006 Tibet groups accuse China of accelerating influx of Han Chinese

(Um... whats wrong with that?)

March 2008 Anti-China riots in Lhasa (wow, really? I didn't know...)

My point: The author clearly didn't do his research and half-assed this article. Probably ran out of time or had a hang-over. Its easy to jump and the band-wagon and bash something everybody else is bashing without thinking for yourself. Im sure it also sells, but i expected more from a professional journalist.

jean
11 April 2008 at 05:37

Good title. So those criminal seperatists started to act out their beast nature by committing violence agaist innocent people and wish their government will not crack them down for the sake of saving their face for the coming Games. Many peopel out of China do not have their Media's permission to see what is hanppening actually in Tibet. It is outragous to watch on TV how a young seperatist repeatiblly punched a young woman walking on the Lhasa 's street with a baby in her stroller. Such kind of senseless criminal action should be and will be cracked down in any civilized society. Honestly speaking, the Tibet seperatists did an amazing job in terms of how they managed to take advantage of those west nations trying to make trouble in China by getting sponsorship money to survive out of China and still able to organize all the shameful protests. Good job and hope you enjoy your life in exile.

dreamback1116
12 April 2008 at 17:57

I am a normal chinese college student. What I want to say here is, actually, minorities in China are the privileged class. When I attend College Entrence Exam, I found out that all minoritis can get a bonus "plus" on their score. Just for that, I lose my chance for the university I dreamed of for nearlt 17 years.

How can a gorvenment like this take any unequal policy on Tibetans?

P.S I post here with all my roommates, we are not naive, the Chinese people are not stupid who can be easily cheated by any media. We know IT is truth, not cheatted by Xinhua agency

Noah1987
17 April 2008 at 09:37

Yes!!!!

Minorities like Tibetans are privileged people in China.

They have larger chance in entering universities, they pay low taxes, they even rob on the streets without fearing to be arested!!!!

Goverment is biased.

They are protected just because they are minorities.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Lindsey Hilsum is China Correspondent for Channel 4 News. She has previously reported extensively from Africa, the Middle East, the Balkans and Latin America.

Read More

Vote!

Was Cliff Richard robbed?

Designed by Wilson Fletcher