Registered user login:

What I saw in Jabaliya

Mohammed Omer

Published 06 March 2008

Observations on Gaza with a special report from Mohammed Omer on an increasingly desperate situation

Through the streets of Jabaliya refugee camp, the nauseous smell of burning tyres mixes with the sickening smell of singed flesh. Houses gutted by bombs teeter on their foundations. Ambulances race through the camp, sirens screaming as they collect the critically injured and random body parts strewn around the streets.

Electricity no longer functions. Clean water is scarce. Families crouch in cubbyholes and makeshift shelters, huddled around small handheld radios, listening, praying, hoping for an end. This is Israel's "Hot Winter", its latest intensified assault on the people of Gaza and its most recent attempt to rout Hamas.

At Jabaliya's Kamal Adwan Hospital, a steady stream of wounded pour in, the lucky still in possession of life and limbs. Frantic family members vie for attention from exhausted emergency staff. An ambulance arrives. Inside a man clings to life, though much of his skin has been plastered on the streets by an F-16. Mercifully he is unconscious.

With just two operating rooms, Kamal Adwan's surgeons struggle to attend to the admitted while performing triage on the arrivals. Blood coats their uniforms. The scene is of organised destruction and a determination to save lives despite the odds. As the surgeons work, an orderly wheels in another victim. This young man arrives in a coma, bleeding profusely from multiple shrapnel wounds delivered by an air-to-ground missile. The doctors desperately attempt to stem the bleeding.

Suddenly all eyes are raised to the ceiling. Outside, the thwop-thwop-thwop of a helicopter gunship envelops the medical sanctuary, its vibration deafening. Moments later, a thud followed by Boom! Boom! Ka-boom! The Israelis are shelling again close by. Stressed and exasperated, those waiting scream. Some cry, while others sit blank-faced in shock.

Leaving the hospital I pass a young man named Mustapha al-Banna being carried in. His legs and one arm are gone; his eyes have welled with tears. Awake yet not awake, his lip quivers, wanting to speak but he can't. His father frets, holding his son's hand. "He was feeding the sheep at our home when an Israeli F-16 bombed our house," he explains. "His legs were blown out from under him!"

Down the street, I hear the cries of a young girl. "Wake up Samah, please!" she screams. But the teenage victim cannot hear; her torso is burned black. Panicking, the young girl looks to her eldest sister on the other side of the room. But this sister, Salwa, is also dead, both siblings killed as they slept by an Israeli F-16.

When the paramedics arrive at the girls' home, they stare in disbelief. "Where is the rest of the body?" an ambulance driver chokes, realising the walls are where she now lies.

Minutes later, down the street, 17-year-old Jaclyn Abu Shbak screams. Her 14-year-old brother Eyad lies motionless in the street. As she approaches his body, an Israeli sniper shoots her dead.

The Atallah family lived in a three-storey building that was bombed by an Israeli F-16. The air strike killed father, mother and four of their children. Their other two children are in a critical condition and have been transferred to an Egyptian hospital.

And thus the carnage continues. Israeli warplanes, citing "self-defence", relentlessly bomb as women and children flee into the night with whatever they can carry.

Nowhere is safe. The planes target homes. Snipers target children and bombs hold no prejudice or preference.

On 29 February, on Israeli army radio, Israel's deputy defence minister Matan Vilnai threatened "Shoah" on Gaza in response to Qassam rocket fire directed at the Israeli colony of Ashkelon, which resulted in the death of one Israeli. Shoah is the Jewish name for the Holocaust. But this justification for Israel's invasion of Gaza ignores the historical context.

When President George W Bush arrived in the Middle East in January, Israel began a sustained bombing of Gaza, while professing to "seek peace". Its siege and collective punishment of Gaza through border closures and the withholding of food, water and medical supplies has now entered its 25th month.

For the first eight months after Israel removed its illegal colonies from Gaza in September 2005, Hamas and the Palestinian resistance observed a ceasefire, despite Israel's continued random shelling, kidnapping of officials and targeted assassinations. This ended in June 2006 when an Israeli ship bombed a beach in Gaza, killing 13 people, 11 from the same family.

Hamas and the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah repeatedly approach Israel to negotiate a ceasefire. Israel continues to reject each overture, intensifying its assaults and causing an endless tit-for-tat with each side escalating and civilians on both sides paying the price.

Operation Hot Winter claimed 60 lives on its first day. As I write, the total number killed has been more than 126 (among them 39 children and babies and 12 women). There have been more than 380 citizens injured and hundreds of houses demolished.

The United Nations defines as a "massacre" the killing of 50 or more civilians. This has been a massacre, the massacre of Jabaliya. And, as Deputy Defence Minister Vilnai threatened, the potential seed of a holocaust.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

12 comments from readers

Morgan097
10 March 2008 at 05:26

Israeli "colony" of Ashkelon?

Wasn't that the delightful Mr Omer I spied gleefully distributing sweets to passing motorists celebrating the murder of Jewish seminary students?

For this the U.S. rescued Britain twice during the last century?

Obviously they needn't have bothered.

Der Sturmer lives!

Cybertiger
10 March 2008 at 08:08

"Der Sturmer lives!"

I fear 'Der Sturmer' has been posted west and is now alive and well and living in a colony of storm troopers in Jerusalem.

Cybertiger
10 March 2008 at 10:28

"Der Sturmer lives!"

I note that Israel's little cybertroopers have stormed the offices of the New Statesman and are indulging themselves in an orgy of censorship.

Cybertiger
10 March 2008 at 12:21

"Operation Hot Winter claimed 60 lives on its first day. As I write, the total number killed has been more than 126 (among them 39 children and babies and 12 women). There have been more than 380 citizens injured and hundreds of houses demolished."

Sliding along the axis of the Israeli democracy is something truly evil.

Morgan097
10 March 2008 at 13:53

Three unanswered "cris de coeur" from abucybertiger within the space of just 4 hours!

The delightful British-appointed Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husseyni, broadcast on Radio Berlin throughout World War II exhorting his fellow Arabs (who hadn't yet been coached by the KGB to call themselves "Palestinians" ) to exterminate the Jews living in their midst (exactly like the present-day elected members of the Gaza Hamas government.)

Yet al-Husseyni continued on as Grand Mufti until 1948. No Nuremberg dock for THIS Foreign Office favourite.

Why do Nazi fellow travellers like abucybertiger get so upset when confronted by the collaborationist history of both their Jew-hating Arab sweethearts and that of their very own perfidious government?

James Donald
13 March 2008 at 12:18

"Why do Nazi fellow travellers like abucybertiger get so upset when confronted by the collaborationist history of both their Jew-hating Arab sweethearts and that of their very own perfidious government?" - Yes, there must be loads of Nazis that read the New Statesman". The gangsters of the Lehi (Stern Gang) tried to collaborate with the Nazis during WW2 but were rebuffed. Does this demonstrate the "collaborationist history" of Jewish extremists?

mikefryer
08 April 2008 at 09:22

To suggest a comparison between Israel and the Shoah is disgraceful. Mr Omer has however made it clear that his bias towards terrorism has clouded the readers view of the true situation in Gaza. Thousands of rockets have been fired at Israeli towns from Gaza and continue to hit Israeli civilian targets as I write. HAMAS have declared that their intention is to destroy Israel and in doing so their aim is to opress their own people in order to gain international sympathy. 95% of the children of Sderot an Israeli town situated two miles outside Gaza are suffering Post Traumatic stress as a result of terrorists attacks from Gaza. Why is it that such as Mr Omer forget that it is the Arab terrorists who are the cause of pain and suffering to both Palestinian Arabs and Israeli's. Please Mr Statesman only publish those articles that resemble the true picture in future.

pinchinat
08 April 2008 at 18:45

This deceptive article is thoroughly and authoritatively debunked and discredited at http://www.camera.org

epaminondas
09 April 2008 at 12:22

All HAMAS has to do is say they agree that Israel has a right to exist, and this becomes a solvable political issue rather than a religious war over a purported muslim waqf.

Until then, this is a RELIGIOUS war of survival, over a freely elected govt in 'palestine' whose stated objective is no jewish state and dhimmi jews.

Of course to say that, they would no tonly no longer be HAMAS, but according to their own doctrine would be APOSTATE.

NEW STATESMEN follows their incredible cover which revealed themselves with still more revelation as to their inner attitudes WHICH NEED OBSERVATION, by allowing purposefully false 'reportage' or being so lazy and irresponsible as to let it slip by.

Karene Bartlett
09 April 2008 at 20:02

Regarding Vilnai’s use of Shoah, a quick web search produces links to BBC, the Guardian, Reuters, referring to Vilnai warning of “a greater holocaust’. Mr. Omer isn’t the first to have coined the translation, nor certainly the most prominent. If even Israel’s ynet and Ha’aretz journalists choose to employ this translation, what is to make Mr. Omer think that it is anything but accurate?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7270650.stm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/feb/29/israelandthepale...

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/959532.html

http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3512978,00.h...

Regarding Omer’s mis-use of the term ‘colony’ when writing about Ahekelon, I would be very interested to learn why he chose that term, whether making an allusion or whether a typo. However, the fact that he has wrongly used one word does not discredit from the point of the article: the conditions of Gazans who have been under siege since, yes, January 2006.

Following Hamas’ elections, the border crossings around Gaza have invariably been closed, except for the briefest openings to a select number. Keeping borders closed is one form of the siege which Israel tightened drastically in September 2007, after having dubbed Gaza an “enemy territory”. From September on, Gaza has been increasingly denied every basic necessity, including fuel, basic food aid, construction materials… So, yes, while Israel has not been preventing food aid entry since January 2006, the siege has most certainly been enforced since that time. With Gaza’s economy shut down, medical professionals in Gaza put 85% of Gazans dependent of humanitarian food aid, aid which is increasingly blocked from entering the Strip.

I struggle to understand some of the comments posted and their relevance to the article and subject matter at hand. It seems that rather than debate the facts, posters here have chosen to lambaste and attempt to discredit Omer with hyperbole and irrelevant tangents.

On the more relevant subject of the rockets being fired from Gaza towards Israel, it is worth considering the nature of these rockets when noting that ‘thousands of rockets have been fired…” It would be

The phrase “Israel’s right to exist” and Hamas’ alleged refusal of it is an example of rhetoric used over and again in the media to distract from the reality of the situation.

It is well known that the current Hamas government has distanced itself from the original Hamas charter which was more vocal in their intentions regarding Israel. The Hamas movement has repeatedly offered ceasefires and has recognized Israel’s existence.

The question that should be put is when and how has Israel recognized Palestinians’ right to exist? Certainly not in the West Bank, where Palestinians movement is restricted and prevented every day by over 500 military checkpoints, over 300 miles of Jewish-only roads, and the crippling sieges (“curfews”) on villages and cities all around the West Bank under that auspice of a ‘security threat’ or whatever reasoning Israel chooses to justify its actions with—reasoning which is never held accountable. Israel certainly isn’t recognizing Palestinians’ right to exist when it cuts off vital food, electricity, and all the other necessities of 1.5 million people in Gaza. Or when, by keeping the borders closed for 2 years, Israel has caused the collapse of Gaza’s economy and the skyrocketing of unemployment. Or when Israeli gunboats fire upon Gazans fishing in their own waters.

As for post-traumatic stresses, children in Gaza suffer not only from PTSD, but also from terror of Israel’s warplanes and helicopters which constantly fly over-head, from the shells the Israeli army drops in civilian areas, from seeing their friends and family torn to shreds by these missiles… The trauma is not comparable. In the West Bank, children suffer from seeing their parents and family members beaten and humiliated at military checkpoints or during military invasions into their towns and homes.

Finally, it is worth considering that Omer is writing from the Gaza Strip itself, not from an office in Jerusalem, and is not only witness to the chaos and suffering he is writing about, but is subject to it as well. Rather than vilify Omer for having inappropriately used the term “colony” and for having like other mainstream papers cited Vilnai’s use of “Shoah”, readers might look at the content of his article and consider the humans he is writing about.

Karene Bartlett
09 April 2008 at 20:08

correction:

[see, everyone makes typos}

"On the more relevant subject of the rockets being fired from Gaza towards Israel, it is worth considering the nature of these rockets when noting that ‘thousands of rockets have been fired…” It would be"

To add to this, I intended to ask readers to consider the nature of these home-made rockets (pipes filled with explosive material, one source described to me) with those highly-developed and exponentially more powerful missiles deployed by Israel on crowded civilian areas.

dorfyperce
14 April 2008 at 11:59

Der Sturmer is pretty awful on history. It took the americans and awful long time to leave the comfort of their over fat country to even get into europe. Now they start wars instead.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Mohammed Omer

Read More

Vote!

Are women equal now?

Win Manu Chao
Albums!

Plus limited edition shirts and vinyl

Enter online